Cargando…

How do health services researchers understand the concept of patient-centeredness? Results from an expert survey

BACKGROUND: The concept of patient-centeredness has gained in importance over recent decades, including its growing importance on a health policy level. However, many different definitions and frameworks exist. This renders both research and implementation into clinical practice difficult. This stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scholl, Isabelle, Zill, Jördis M, Härter, Martin, Dirmaier, Jörg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4155992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25210444
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S64051
_version_ 1782333669360271360
author Scholl, Isabelle
Zill, Jördis M
Härter, Martin
Dirmaier, Jörg
author_facet Scholl, Isabelle
Zill, Jördis M
Härter, Martin
Dirmaier, Jörg
author_sort Scholl, Isabelle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The concept of patient-centeredness has gained in importance over recent decades, including its growing importance on a health policy level. However, many different definitions and frameworks exist. This renders both research and implementation into clinical practice difficult. This study aimed at assessing how German researchers conceptualize patient-centeredness, how they translate the German equivalent into English, and what they consider the most important references on the topic. METHODS: All researchers within a German research priority program on patient-centeredness were invited to participate in an online survey with open questions. The data regarding the definitions of patient-centeredness were analyzed using the method of conventional content analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the responses on translations and references. RESULTS: Thirty-eight (28%) of 136 invited researchers participated in the study. The definitions given by the participants could be classified into ten categories: patient as a unique person, involvement in decision-making, patient information, essential characteristics of the physician, biopsychosocial perspective, patient empowerment, individualized services, patient-reported outcomes, involvement in health policy and coordination and teamwork. The results for the translation of the German word “Patientenorientierung” into English indicate that uncertainty regarding the appropriate English terminology exists. All participants provided a different reference on patient-centeredness that was important to them. CONCLUSION: The results show a certain degree of “shared meaning” regarding the concept of patient-centeredness. However, they also indicate a considerable amount of “surplus meaning”, which can be seen as an indicator for the fuzziness of a theoretical concept. All in all, this study has shown that the conceptual ambiguity found in the literature on patient-centeredness is partly reflected in the conceptualizations of German researchers working in that field. This calls for more conceptual work, eg, developing an integrative model on patient-centeredness grounded in the international literature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4155992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41559922014-09-10 How do health services researchers understand the concept of patient-centeredness? Results from an expert survey Scholl, Isabelle Zill, Jördis M Härter, Martin Dirmaier, Jörg Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research BACKGROUND: The concept of patient-centeredness has gained in importance over recent decades, including its growing importance on a health policy level. However, many different definitions and frameworks exist. This renders both research and implementation into clinical practice difficult. This study aimed at assessing how German researchers conceptualize patient-centeredness, how they translate the German equivalent into English, and what they consider the most important references on the topic. METHODS: All researchers within a German research priority program on patient-centeredness were invited to participate in an online survey with open questions. The data regarding the definitions of patient-centeredness were analyzed using the method of conventional content analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the responses on translations and references. RESULTS: Thirty-eight (28%) of 136 invited researchers participated in the study. The definitions given by the participants could be classified into ten categories: patient as a unique person, involvement in decision-making, patient information, essential characteristics of the physician, biopsychosocial perspective, patient empowerment, individualized services, patient-reported outcomes, involvement in health policy and coordination and teamwork. The results for the translation of the German word “Patientenorientierung” into English indicate that uncertainty regarding the appropriate English terminology exists. All participants provided a different reference on patient-centeredness that was important to them. CONCLUSION: The results show a certain degree of “shared meaning” regarding the concept of patient-centeredness. However, they also indicate a considerable amount of “surplus meaning”, which can be seen as an indicator for the fuzziness of a theoretical concept. All in all, this study has shown that the conceptual ambiguity found in the literature on patient-centeredness is partly reflected in the conceptualizations of German researchers working in that field. This calls for more conceptual work, eg, developing an integrative model on patient-centeredness grounded in the international literature. Dove Medical Press 2014-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4155992/ /pubmed/25210444 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S64051 Text en © 2014 Scholl et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Scholl, Isabelle
Zill, Jördis M
Härter, Martin
Dirmaier, Jörg
How do health services researchers understand the concept of patient-centeredness? Results from an expert survey
title How do health services researchers understand the concept of patient-centeredness? Results from an expert survey
title_full How do health services researchers understand the concept of patient-centeredness? Results from an expert survey
title_fullStr How do health services researchers understand the concept of patient-centeredness? Results from an expert survey
title_full_unstemmed How do health services researchers understand the concept of patient-centeredness? Results from an expert survey
title_short How do health services researchers understand the concept of patient-centeredness? Results from an expert survey
title_sort how do health services researchers understand the concept of patient-centeredness? results from an expert survey
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4155992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25210444
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S64051
work_keys_str_mv AT schollisabelle howdohealthservicesresearchersunderstandtheconceptofpatientcenterednessresultsfromanexpertsurvey
AT zilljordism howdohealthservicesresearchersunderstandtheconceptofpatientcenterednessresultsfromanexpertsurvey
AT hartermartin howdohealthservicesresearchersunderstandtheconceptofpatientcenterednessresultsfromanexpertsurvey
AT dirmaierjorg howdohealthservicesresearchersunderstandtheconceptofpatientcenterednessresultsfromanexpertsurvey