Cargando…

Acromegaly according to the Danish National Registry of Patients: how valid are ICD diagnoses and how do patterns of registration affect the accuracy of registry data?

BACKGROUND: The incidence of acromegaly is uncertain, since population-based studies are few. In the absence of a specific acromegaly registry, the Danish National Registry of Patients (DNRP) becomes a potential source of data for studying the epidemiology of acromegaly, by linking all hospital disc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dal, Jakob, Skou, Nikolaj, Nielsen, Eigil Husted, Jørgensen, Jens Otto Lunde, Pedersen, Lars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4155997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25210475
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S63758
_version_ 1782333670657359872
author Dal, Jakob
Skou, Nikolaj
Nielsen, Eigil Husted
Jørgensen, Jens Otto Lunde
Pedersen, Lars
author_facet Dal, Jakob
Skou, Nikolaj
Nielsen, Eigil Husted
Jørgensen, Jens Otto Lunde
Pedersen, Lars
author_sort Dal, Jakob
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The incidence of acromegaly is uncertain, since population-based studies are few. In the absence of a specific acromegaly registry, the Danish National Registry of Patients (DNRP) becomes a potential source of data for studying the epidemiology of acromegaly, by linking all hospital discharge diagnoses to the personal identification numbers of individual Danish inhabitants. The validity of the DNRP with respect to acromegaly, however, remains to be tested. The aim of this study was to validate the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for acromegaly (ICD-8: 25300, 25301. ICD-10: E22.0) as used in the DNRP, and to assess the influence of various registration patterns on the accuracy of registry data. METHODS: We identified patients registered with ICD codes for the diagnosis of acromegaly or other pituitary disorders during the period 1991–2009. Data on the institutional origin of each registration and the number of relevant DNRP registrations were recorded, and systematic patient chart reviews were performed to confirm the diagnosis. RESULTS: In total, 110 cases of acromegaly were confirmed, compared with 275 registered cases, yielding a positive predictive value (PPV) of 40%. When restricting the search to the regional highly specialized department of endocrinology, the PPV increased to 53% with no loss of cases with confirmed acromegaly. With a requirement of at least one, two, or three DNRP registrations, the PPV increased, but with a concurrent loss of confirmed cases. CONCLUSION: The DNRP seems to be a useful source for identifying new cases of acromegaly, especially when restricting the search to a relevant regional highly specialized department. The PPV of DNRP data used for this purpose can be increased by including only cases with several registrations. A similar approach may be successfully applied to other rare diseases in which continuity of care is provided by highly specialized departments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4155997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41559972014-09-10 Acromegaly according to the Danish National Registry of Patients: how valid are ICD diagnoses and how do patterns of registration affect the accuracy of registry data? Dal, Jakob Skou, Nikolaj Nielsen, Eigil Husted Jørgensen, Jens Otto Lunde Pedersen, Lars Clin Epidemiol Original Research BACKGROUND: The incidence of acromegaly is uncertain, since population-based studies are few. In the absence of a specific acromegaly registry, the Danish National Registry of Patients (DNRP) becomes a potential source of data for studying the epidemiology of acromegaly, by linking all hospital discharge diagnoses to the personal identification numbers of individual Danish inhabitants. The validity of the DNRP with respect to acromegaly, however, remains to be tested. The aim of this study was to validate the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for acromegaly (ICD-8: 25300, 25301. ICD-10: E22.0) as used in the DNRP, and to assess the influence of various registration patterns on the accuracy of registry data. METHODS: We identified patients registered with ICD codes for the diagnosis of acromegaly or other pituitary disorders during the period 1991–2009. Data on the institutional origin of each registration and the number of relevant DNRP registrations were recorded, and systematic patient chart reviews were performed to confirm the diagnosis. RESULTS: In total, 110 cases of acromegaly were confirmed, compared with 275 registered cases, yielding a positive predictive value (PPV) of 40%. When restricting the search to the regional highly specialized department of endocrinology, the PPV increased to 53% with no loss of cases with confirmed acromegaly. With a requirement of at least one, two, or three DNRP registrations, the PPV increased, but with a concurrent loss of confirmed cases. CONCLUSION: The DNRP seems to be a useful source for identifying new cases of acromegaly, especially when restricting the search to a relevant regional highly specialized department. The PPV of DNRP data used for this purpose can be increased by including only cases with several registrations. A similar approach may be successfully applied to other rare diseases in which continuity of care is provided by highly specialized departments. Dove Medical Press 2014-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4155997/ /pubmed/25210475 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S63758 Text en © 2014 Dal et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Dal, Jakob
Skou, Nikolaj
Nielsen, Eigil Husted
Jørgensen, Jens Otto Lunde
Pedersen, Lars
Acromegaly according to the Danish National Registry of Patients: how valid are ICD diagnoses and how do patterns of registration affect the accuracy of registry data?
title Acromegaly according to the Danish National Registry of Patients: how valid are ICD diagnoses and how do patterns of registration affect the accuracy of registry data?
title_full Acromegaly according to the Danish National Registry of Patients: how valid are ICD diagnoses and how do patterns of registration affect the accuracy of registry data?
title_fullStr Acromegaly according to the Danish National Registry of Patients: how valid are ICD diagnoses and how do patterns of registration affect the accuracy of registry data?
title_full_unstemmed Acromegaly according to the Danish National Registry of Patients: how valid are ICD diagnoses and how do patterns of registration affect the accuracy of registry data?
title_short Acromegaly according to the Danish National Registry of Patients: how valid are ICD diagnoses and how do patterns of registration affect the accuracy of registry data?
title_sort acromegaly according to the danish national registry of patients: how valid are icd diagnoses and how do patterns of registration affect the accuracy of registry data?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4155997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25210475
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S63758
work_keys_str_mv AT daljakob acromegalyaccordingtothedanishnationalregistryofpatientshowvalidareicddiagnosesandhowdopatternsofregistrationaffecttheaccuracyofregistrydata
AT skounikolaj acromegalyaccordingtothedanishnationalregistryofpatientshowvalidareicddiagnosesandhowdopatternsofregistrationaffecttheaccuracyofregistrydata
AT nielseneigilhusted acromegalyaccordingtothedanishnationalregistryofpatientshowvalidareicddiagnosesandhowdopatternsofregistrationaffecttheaccuracyofregistrydata
AT jørgensenjensottolunde acromegalyaccordingtothedanishnationalregistryofpatientshowvalidareicddiagnosesandhowdopatternsofregistrationaffecttheaccuracyofregistrydata
AT pedersenlars acromegalyaccordingtothedanishnationalregistryofpatientshowvalidareicddiagnosesandhowdopatternsofregistrationaffecttheaccuracyofregistrydata