Cargando…

Axillary and rectal thermometry in the newborn: do they agree?

BACKGROUND: Accurate measurement of body temperature is critical for the assessment of a newborn’s general well-being. In nursery settings, the gold standard rectal thermometry has been replaced by the axillary method. However, evidence pertaining to the agreement between axillary and rectal thermom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Charafeddine, Lama, Tamim, Hani, Hassouna, Habiba, Akel, Randa, Nabulsi, Mona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4156607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25176563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-584
_version_ 1782333759108939776
author Charafeddine, Lama
Tamim, Hani
Hassouna, Habiba
Akel, Randa
Nabulsi, Mona
author_facet Charafeddine, Lama
Tamim, Hani
Hassouna, Habiba
Akel, Randa
Nabulsi, Mona
author_sort Charafeddine, Lama
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accurate measurement of body temperature is critical for the assessment of a newborn’s general well-being. In nursery settings, the gold standard rectal thermometry has been replaced by the axillary method. However, evidence pertaining to the agreement between axillary and rectal thermometry in the newborn is controversial. In this cross-sectional study, the agreement between axillary and rectal temperature in newborns, as well as the effects of neonatal, maternal and environmental factors on this agreement were investigated. METHODS: The mean difference between axillary and rectal temperatures was compared in stable term and preterm newborns using paired t-test for the means of differences, Pearson correlation coefficient (r), and the Bland-Altman plot. Stepwise multivariate regression assessed predictors of this difference in the overall group and by gestational age categories. RESULTS: The study included 118 newborns with gestational ages ranging from 29 to 41 weeks, median birth weight of 2980 grams (IQR: 2321.3-3363.8). Axillary and rectal temperatures correlated significantly (r = 0.5, p = 0.000) and had similar overall means but differed in 34–36 weeks gestation newborns (p = 0.01). Correlation between both methods increased with advancing gestational age being highest in term newborns (r = 0.6, p = 0.000). Bland-Altman plots revealed good agreement in gestational ages above 29 weeks. The difference between measurements increased with Cesarean delivery (ß = 0.2; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.38), but decreased with advancing chronological age (ß = -0.01; 95% CI: -0.02,-0.01), and with gestational age (ß = -0.05; 95% CI: -0.08,-0.01). CONCLUSION: In clinically stable term and preterm infants, axillary thermometry is as reliable as rectal measurement. Predictors of agreement between the two methods include gestational age, chronological age and mode of delivery. Further studies are needed to confirm this agreement in sick newborns and in extremely premature infants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4156607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41566072014-09-07 Axillary and rectal thermometry in the newborn: do they agree? Charafeddine, Lama Tamim, Hani Hassouna, Habiba Akel, Randa Nabulsi, Mona BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: Accurate measurement of body temperature is critical for the assessment of a newborn’s general well-being. In nursery settings, the gold standard rectal thermometry has been replaced by the axillary method. However, evidence pertaining to the agreement between axillary and rectal thermometry in the newborn is controversial. In this cross-sectional study, the agreement between axillary and rectal temperature in newborns, as well as the effects of neonatal, maternal and environmental factors on this agreement were investigated. METHODS: The mean difference between axillary and rectal temperatures was compared in stable term and preterm newborns using paired t-test for the means of differences, Pearson correlation coefficient (r), and the Bland-Altman plot. Stepwise multivariate regression assessed predictors of this difference in the overall group and by gestational age categories. RESULTS: The study included 118 newborns with gestational ages ranging from 29 to 41 weeks, median birth weight of 2980 grams (IQR: 2321.3-3363.8). Axillary and rectal temperatures correlated significantly (r = 0.5, p = 0.000) and had similar overall means but differed in 34–36 weeks gestation newborns (p = 0.01). Correlation between both methods increased with advancing gestational age being highest in term newborns (r = 0.6, p = 0.000). Bland-Altman plots revealed good agreement in gestational ages above 29 weeks. The difference between measurements increased with Cesarean delivery (ß = 0.2; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.38), but decreased with advancing chronological age (ß = -0.01; 95% CI: -0.02,-0.01), and with gestational age (ß = -0.05; 95% CI: -0.08,-0.01). CONCLUSION: In clinically stable term and preterm infants, axillary thermometry is as reliable as rectal measurement. Predictors of agreement between the two methods include gestational age, chronological age and mode of delivery. Further studies are needed to confirm this agreement in sick newborns and in extremely premature infants. BioMed Central 2014-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4156607/ /pubmed/25176563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-584 Text en © Charafeddine et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Charafeddine, Lama
Tamim, Hani
Hassouna, Habiba
Akel, Randa
Nabulsi, Mona
Axillary and rectal thermometry in the newborn: do they agree?
title Axillary and rectal thermometry in the newborn: do they agree?
title_full Axillary and rectal thermometry in the newborn: do they agree?
title_fullStr Axillary and rectal thermometry in the newborn: do they agree?
title_full_unstemmed Axillary and rectal thermometry in the newborn: do they agree?
title_short Axillary and rectal thermometry in the newborn: do they agree?
title_sort axillary and rectal thermometry in the newborn: do they agree?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4156607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25176563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-584
work_keys_str_mv AT charafeddinelama axillaryandrectalthermometryinthenewborndotheyagree
AT tamimhani axillaryandrectalthermometryinthenewborndotheyagree
AT hassounahabiba axillaryandrectalthermometryinthenewborndotheyagree
AT akelranda axillaryandrectalthermometryinthenewborndotheyagree
AT nabulsimona axillaryandrectalthermometryinthenewborndotheyagree