Cargando…
Estimation of soft- and hard-tissue thickness at implant sites
INTRODUCTION: Anchorage control is a critical consideration when planning treatment for patients with dental and skeletal malocclusions. To obtain sufficient stability of implants, the thickness of the soft tissue and the cortical-bone in the placement site must be considered; so as to provide an an...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4157277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25210381 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.137384 |
_version_ | 1782333850132676608 |
---|---|
author | Kumar, Anil Mascarenhas, Rohan Husain, Akhter |
author_facet | Kumar, Anil Mascarenhas, Rohan Husain, Akhter |
author_sort | Kumar, Anil |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Anchorage control is a critical consideration when planning treatment for patients with dental and skeletal malocclusions. To obtain sufficient stability of implants, the thickness of the soft tissue and the cortical-bone in the placement site must be considered; so as to provide an anatomical map in order to assist the clinician in the placement of the implants. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the thickness of soft- and hard-tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To measure soft tissue and cortical-bone thicknesses, 12 maxillary cross-sectional specimens were obtained from the cadavers, which were made at three maxillary mid-palatal suture areas: The interdental area between the first and second premolars (Group 1), the second premolar and the first molar (Group 2), and the first and second molars (Group 3). Sectioned samples along with reference rulers were digitally scanned. Scanned images were calibrated and measurements were made with image-analysis software. We measured the thickness of soft and hard-tissues at five sectional areas parallel to the buccopalatal cementoenamel junction (CEJ) line at 2-mm intervals and also thickness of soft tissue at the six landmarks including the incisive papilla (IP) on the palate. The line perpendicular to the occlusal plane was made and measurement was taken at 4-mm intervals from the closest five points to IP. RESULTS: (1) Group 1:6 mm from CEJ in buccal side and 2 mm from CEJ in palatal side. (2) Group 2:8 mm from CEJ in buccal side and 4 mm from CEJ in palatal side. (3) Group 3:8 mm from CEJ in buccal side and 8 mm from CEJ in palatal side. CONCLUSIONS: The best site for placement of implant is with thinnest soft tissue and thickest hard tissue, which is in the middle from CEJ in buccal side and closest from CEJ in palatal side in Group 1 and faraway from CEJ in buccal side and closest from CEJ in palatal side in Group 2 and faraway from CEJ in buccal side and faraway from CEJ in palatal side in Group 3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4157277 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41572772014-09-10 Estimation of soft- and hard-tissue thickness at implant sites Kumar, Anil Mascarenhas, Rohan Husain, Akhter J Pharm Bioallied Sci Dental Science - Original Article INTRODUCTION: Anchorage control is a critical consideration when planning treatment for patients with dental and skeletal malocclusions. To obtain sufficient stability of implants, the thickness of the soft tissue and the cortical-bone in the placement site must be considered; so as to provide an anatomical map in order to assist the clinician in the placement of the implants. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the thickness of soft- and hard-tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To measure soft tissue and cortical-bone thicknesses, 12 maxillary cross-sectional specimens were obtained from the cadavers, which were made at three maxillary mid-palatal suture areas: The interdental area between the first and second premolars (Group 1), the second premolar and the first molar (Group 2), and the first and second molars (Group 3). Sectioned samples along with reference rulers were digitally scanned. Scanned images were calibrated and measurements were made with image-analysis software. We measured the thickness of soft and hard-tissues at five sectional areas parallel to the buccopalatal cementoenamel junction (CEJ) line at 2-mm intervals and also thickness of soft tissue at the six landmarks including the incisive papilla (IP) on the palate. The line perpendicular to the occlusal plane was made and measurement was taken at 4-mm intervals from the closest five points to IP. RESULTS: (1) Group 1:6 mm from CEJ in buccal side and 2 mm from CEJ in palatal side. (2) Group 2:8 mm from CEJ in buccal side and 4 mm from CEJ in palatal side. (3) Group 3:8 mm from CEJ in buccal side and 8 mm from CEJ in palatal side. CONCLUSIONS: The best site for placement of implant is with thinnest soft tissue and thickest hard tissue, which is in the middle from CEJ in buccal side and closest from CEJ in palatal side in Group 1 and faraway from CEJ in buccal side and closest from CEJ in palatal side in Group 2 and faraway from CEJ in buccal side and faraway from CEJ in palatal side in Group 3. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4157277/ /pubmed/25210381 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.137384 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Dental Science - Original Article Kumar, Anil Mascarenhas, Rohan Husain, Akhter Estimation of soft- and hard-tissue thickness at implant sites |
title | Estimation of soft- and hard-tissue thickness at implant sites |
title_full | Estimation of soft- and hard-tissue thickness at implant sites |
title_fullStr | Estimation of soft- and hard-tissue thickness at implant sites |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimation of soft- and hard-tissue thickness at implant sites |
title_short | Estimation of soft- and hard-tissue thickness at implant sites |
title_sort | estimation of soft- and hard-tissue thickness at implant sites |
topic | Dental Science - Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4157277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25210381 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.137384 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kumaranil estimationofsoftandhardtissuethicknessatimplantsites AT mascarenhasrohan estimationofsoftandhardtissuethicknessatimplantsites AT husainakhter estimationofsoftandhardtissuethicknessatimplantsites |