Cargando…

Direct investment by stepfathers can mitigate effects on educational outcomes but does not improve behavioural difficulties

In contemporary developed populations, stepfather presence has been associated with detrimental effects on child development. However, the proximate mechanisms behind such effects are yet to be fully explored. From a behavioural ecological perspective, the negative effects associated with stepfather...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Emmott, Emily H., Mace, Ruth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4157324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25214758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.05.010
_version_ 1782333859591880704
author Emmott, Emily H.
Mace, Ruth
author_facet Emmott, Emily H.
Mace, Ruth
author_sort Emmott, Emily H.
collection PubMed
description In contemporary developed populations, stepfather presence has been associated with detrimental effects on child development. However, the proximate mechanisms behind such effects are yet to be fully explored. From a behavioural ecological perspective, the negative effects associated with stepfathers may be due to the reduced quantity and quality of investments children receive within stepfather households. Here, we build on previous studies by investigating whether the effects of stepfather presence on child outcomes are driven by differences in maternal and partner (i.e., father or stepfather) direct investments. We use data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children to explore stepfather effects on children’s educational achievement and behavioural difficulties at age 7. Our results indicate that, for educational achievement, stepfather effects are due to the lower levels of direct investments children receive. For behavioural difficulty, stepfather effects are due to multiple factors whereby stepfather presence is associated with greater difficulties independent of investment levels, and direct investments from stepfathers are ineffective. Our results suggest that the negative effects of stepfathers on child outcomes can be explained, in part, by the reduced quantity and the ineffectiveness of direct investments children receive from stepfathers. Furthermore, the effects of stepfather direct investments seem to vary between child outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4157324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41573242014-09-09 Direct investment by stepfathers can mitigate effects on educational outcomes but does not improve behavioural difficulties Emmott, Emily H. Mace, Ruth Evol Hum Behav Original Article In contemporary developed populations, stepfather presence has been associated with detrimental effects on child development. However, the proximate mechanisms behind such effects are yet to be fully explored. From a behavioural ecological perspective, the negative effects associated with stepfathers may be due to the reduced quantity and quality of investments children receive within stepfather households. Here, we build on previous studies by investigating whether the effects of stepfather presence on child outcomes are driven by differences in maternal and partner (i.e., father or stepfather) direct investments. We use data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children to explore stepfather effects on children’s educational achievement and behavioural difficulties at age 7. Our results indicate that, for educational achievement, stepfather effects are due to the lower levels of direct investments children receive. For behavioural difficulty, stepfather effects are due to multiple factors whereby stepfather presence is associated with greater difficulties independent of investment levels, and direct investments from stepfathers are ineffective. Our results suggest that the negative effects of stepfathers on child outcomes can be explained, in part, by the reduced quantity and the ineffectiveness of direct investments children receive from stepfathers. Furthermore, the effects of stepfather direct investments seem to vary between child outcomes. Elsevier Science 2014-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4157324/ /pubmed/25214758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.05.010 Text en © 2014 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-SA license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Emmott, Emily H.
Mace, Ruth
Direct investment by stepfathers can mitigate effects on educational outcomes but does not improve behavioural difficulties
title Direct investment by stepfathers can mitigate effects on educational outcomes but does not improve behavioural difficulties
title_full Direct investment by stepfathers can mitigate effects on educational outcomes but does not improve behavioural difficulties
title_fullStr Direct investment by stepfathers can mitigate effects on educational outcomes but does not improve behavioural difficulties
title_full_unstemmed Direct investment by stepfathers can mitigate effects on educational outcomes but does not improve behavioural difficulties
title_short Direct investment by stepfathers can mitigate effects on educational outcomes but does not improve behavioural difficulties
title_sort direct investment by stepfathers can mitigate effects on educational outcomes but does not improve behavioural difficulties
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4157324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25214758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.05.010
work_keys_str_mv AT emmottemilyh directinvestmentbystepfatherscanmitigateeffectsoneducationaloutcomesbutdoesnotimprovebehaviouraldifficulties
AT maceruth directinvestmentbystepfatherscanmitigateeffectsoneducationaloutcomesbutdoesnotimprovebehaviouraldifficulties