Cargando…
Direct investment by stepfathers can mitigate effects on educational outcomes but does not improve behavioural difficulties
In contemporary developed populations, stepfather presence has been associated with detrimental effects on child development. However, the proximate mechanisms behind such effects are yet to be fully explored. From a behavioural ecological perspective, the negative effects associated with stepfather...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4157324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25214758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.05.010 |
_version_ | 1782333859591880704 |
---|---|
author | Emmott, Emily H. Mace, Ruth |
author_facet | Emmott, Emily H. Mace, Ruth |
author_sort | Emmott, Emily H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In contemporary developed populations, stepfather presence has been associated with detrimental effects on child development. However, the proximate mechanisms behind such effects are yet to be fully explored. From a behavioural ecological perspective, the negative effects associated with stepfathers may be due to the reduced quantity and quality of investments children receive within stepfather households. Here, we build on previous studies by investigating whether the effects of stepfather presence on child outcomes are driven by differences in maternal and partner (i.e., father or stepfather) direct investments. We use data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children to explore stepfather effects on children’s educational achievement and behavioural difficulties at age 7. Our results indicate that, for educational achievement, stepfather effects are due to the lower levels of direct investments children receive. For behavioural difficulty, stepfather effects are due to multiple factors whereby stepfather presence is associated with greater difficulties independent of investment levels, and direct investments from stepfathers are ineffective. Our results suggest that the negative effects of stepfathers on child outcomes can be explained, in part, by the reduced quantity and the ineffectiveness of direct investments children receive from stepfathers. Furthermore, the effects of stepfather direct investments seem to vary between child outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4157324 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Elsevier Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41573242014-09-09 Direct investment by stepfathers can mitigate effects on educational outcomes but does not improve behavioural difficulties Emmott, Emily H. Mace, Ruth Evol Hum Behav Original Article In contemporary developed populations, stepfather presence has been associated with detrimental effects on child development. However, the proximate mechanisms behind such effects are yet to be fully explored. From a behavioural ecological perspective, the negative effects associated with stepfathers may be due to the reduced quantity and quality of investments children receive within stepfather households. Here, we build on previous studies by investigating whether the effects of stepfather presence on child outcomes are driven by differences in maternal and partner (i.e., father or stepfather) direct investments. We use data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children to explore stepfather effects on children’s educational achievement and behavioural difficulties at age 7. Our results indicate that, for educational achievement, stepfather effects are due to the lower levels of direct investments children receive. For behavioural difficulty, stepfather effects are due to multiple factors whereby stepfather presence is associated with greater difficulties independent of investment levels, and direct investments from stepfathers are ineffective. Our results suggest that the negative effects of stepfathers on child outcomes can be explained, in part, by the reduced quantity and the ineffectiveness of direct investments children receive from stepfathers. Furthermore, the effects of stepfather direct investments seem to vary between child outcomes. Elsevier Science 2014-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4157324/ /pubmed/25214758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.05.010 Text en © 2014 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-SA license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Emmott, Emily H. Mace, Ruth Direct investment by stepfathers can mitigate effects on educational outcomes but does not improve behavioural difficulties |
title | Direct investment by stepfathers can mitigate effects on educational outcomes but does not improve behavioural difficulties |
title_full | Direct investment by stepfathers can mitigate effects on educational outcomes but does not improve behavioural difficulties |
title_fullStr | Direct investment by stepfathers can mitigate effects on educational outcomes but does not improve behavioural difficulties |
title_full_unstemmed | Direct investment by stepfathers can mitigate effects on educational outcomes but does not improve behavioural difficulties |
title_short | Direct investment by stepfathers can mitigate effects on educational outcomes but does not improve behavioural difficulties |
title_sort | direct investment by stepfathers can mitigate effects on educational outcomes but does not improve behavioural difficulties |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4157324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25214758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.05.010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT emmottemilyh directinvestmentbystepfatherscanmitigateeffectsoneducationaloutcomesbutdoesnotimprovebehaviouraldifficulties AT maceruth directinvestmentbystepfatherscanmitigateeffectsoneducationaloutcomesbutdoesnotimprovebehaviouraldifficulties |