Cargando…
Motor and functional recovery after neck dissection: comparison of two early physical rehabilitation programmes
The aim of this prospective, single-centre, non-randomized explorative study is to comparatively assess two-month results of two early rehabilitation programmes in patients receiving neck dissection for head and neck cancer, with the hypothesis that those not receiving therapist-assisted physiothera...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pacini Editore SpA
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4157535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25210216 |
_version_ | 1782333892325277696 |
---|---|
author | BAGGI, F. SANTORO, L. GROSSO, E. ZANETTI, C. BONACOSSA, E. SANDRIN, F. MASSARO, M.A. TRADATI, N. SIMONCINI, M.C. |
author_facet | BAGGI, F. SANTORO, L. GROSSO, E. ZANETTI, C. BONACOSSA, E. SANDRIN, F. MASSARO, M.A. TRADATI, N. SIMONCINI, M.C. |
author_sort | BAGGI, F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this prospective, single-centre, non-randomized explorative study is to comparatively assess two-month results of two early rehabilitation programmes in patients receiving neck dissection for head and neck cancer, with the hypothesis that those not receiving therapist-assisted physiotherapy would take an active role in their own rehabilitation to enhance outcomes. At the European Institute of Oncology, Milan (Italy), 97 patients were registered during the pre-hospitalization period and divided into an Autonomous group (living distant from the hospital) and a Physio group (living near). As expected, only 50 patients (25 per group) completed the study. Both groups received a Physical Therapy Brochure with instructions on to how to perform exercises at home. Home physical exercises started five days after surgery and continued for two months. The Autonomous group received a pre-surgery instruction session; the Physio group attended four once-weekly therapist-guided physiotherapy sessions. Two months after surgery, arm mobility and pain had recovered to pre-operative levels. Most endpoints, including the main composite, did not differ between groups. Although longer-follow-up is necessary, early physiotherapy seems to be effective in maintaining arm mobility and reducing pain, even in patients empowered to do exercises autonomously. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4157535 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Pacini Editore SpA |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41575352014-09-10 Motor and functional recovery after neck dissection: comparison of two early physical rehabilitation programmes BAGGI, F. SANTORO, L. GROSSO, E. ZANETTI, C. BONACOSSA, E. SANDRIN, F. MASSARO, M.A. TRADATI, N. SIMONCINI, M.C. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Head and Neck The aim of this prospective, single-centre, non-randomized explorative study is to comparatively assess two-month results of two early rehabilitation programmes in patients receiving neck dissection for head and neck cancer, with the hypothesis that those not receiving therapist-assisted physiotherapy would take an active role in their own rehabilitation to enhance outcomes. At the European Institute of Oncology, Milan (Italy), 97 patients were registered during the pre-hospitalization period and divided into an Autonomous group (living distant from the hospital) and a Physio group (living near). As expected, only 50 patients (25 per group) completed the study. Both groups received a Physical Therapy Brochure with instructions on to how to perform exercises at home. Home physical exercises started five days after surgery and continued for two months. The Autonomous group received a pre-surgery instruction session; the Physio group attended four once-weekly therapist-guided physiotherapy sessions. Two months after surgery, arm mobility and pain had recovered to pre-operative levels. Most endpoints, including the main composite, did not differ between groups. Although longer-follow-up is necessary, early physiotherapy seems to be effective in maintaining arm mobility and reducing pain, even in patients empowered to do exercises autonomously. Pacini Editore SpA 2014-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4157535/ /pubmed/25210216 Text en © Copyright by Società Italiana di Otorinolaringologia e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License, which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any digital medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. For details, please refer to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Head and Neck BAGGI, F. SANTORO, L. GROSSO, E. ZANETTI, C. BONACOSSA, E. SANDRIN, F. MASSARO, M.A. TRADATI, N. SIMONCINI, M.C. Motor and functional recovery after neck dissection: comparison of two early physical rehabilitation programmes |
title | Motor and functional recovery after neck dissection:
comparison of two early physical rehabilitation
programmes |
title_full | Motor and functional recovery after neck dissection:
comparison of two early physical rehabilitation
programmes |
title_fullStr | Motor and functional recovery after neck dissection:
comparison of two early physical rehabilitation
programmes |
title_full_unstemmed | Motor and functional recovery after neck dissection:
comparison of two early physical rehabilitation
programmes |
title_short | Motor and functional recovery after neck dissection:
comparison of two early physical rehabilitation
programmes |
title_sort | motor and functional recovery after neck dissection:
comparison of two early physical rehabilitation
programmes |
topic | Head and Neck |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4157535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25210216 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baggif motorandfunctionalrecoveryafterneckdissectioncomparisonoftwoearlyphysicalrehabilitationprogrammes AT santorol motorandfunctionalrecoveryafterneckdissectioncomparisonoftwoearlyphysicalrehabilitationprogrammes AT grossoe motorandfunctionalrecoveryafterneckdissectioncomparisonoftwoearlyphysicalrehabilitationprogrammes AT zanettic motorandfunctionalrecoveryafterneckdissectioncomparisonoftwoearlyphysicalrehabilitationprogrammes AT bonacossae motorandfunctionalrecoveryafterneckdissectioncomparisonoftwoearlyphysicalrehabilitationprogrammes AT sandrinf motorandfunctionalrecoveryafterneckdissectioncomparisonoftwoearlyphysicalrehabilitationprogrammes AT massaroma motorandfunctionalrecoveryafterneckdissectioncomparisonoftwoearlyphysicalrehabilitationprogrammes AT tradatin motorandfunctionalrecoveryafterneckdissectioncomparisonoftwoearlyphysicalrehabilitationprogrammes AT simoncinimc motorandfunctionalrecoveryafterneckdissectioncomparisonoftwoearlyphysicalrehabilitationprogrammes |