Cargando…

Reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration following terminal visual feedback of the hand

We have shown that when subjects reach with continuous, misaligned visual feedback of their hand, their reaches are adapted and proprioceptive sense of hand position is recalibrated to partially match the visual feedback (Salomonczyk et al., 2011). It is unclear if similar changes arise after reachi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barkley, Victoria, Salomonczyk, Danielle, Cressman, Erin K., Henriques, Denise Y. P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4157547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25249969
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00705
_version_ 1782333896243806208
author Barkley, Victoria
Salomonczyk, Danielle
Cressman, Erin K.
Henriques, Denise Y. P.
author_facet Barkley, Victoria
Salomonczyk, Danielle
Cressman, Erin K.
Henriques, Denise Y. P.
author_sort Barkley, Victoria
collection PubMed
description We have shown that when subjects reach with continuous, misaligned visual feedback of their hand, their reaches are adapted and proprioceptive sense of hand position is recalibrated to partially match the visual feedback (Salomonczyk et al., 2011). It is unclear if similar changes arise after reaching with visual feedback that is provided only at the end of the reach (i.e., terminal feedback), when there are shorter temporal intervals for subjects to experience concurrent visual and proprioceptive feedback. Subjects reached to targets with an aligned hand-cursor that provided visual feedback at the end of each reach movement across a 99-trial training block, and with a rotated cursor over three successive blocks of 99 trials each. After each block, no cursor reaches, to measure aftereffects, and felt hand positions were measured. Felt hand position was determined by having subjects indicate the position of their unseen hand relative to a reference marker. We found that subjects adapted their reaches following training with rotated terminal visual feedback, yet slightly less (i.e., reach aftereffects were smaller), than subjects from a previous study who experienced continuous visual feedback. Nonetheless, current subjects recalibrated their sense of felt hand position in the direction of the altered visual feedback, but this proprioceptive change increased incrementally over the three rotated training blocks. Final proprioceptive recalibration levels were comparable to our previous studies in which subjects performed the same task with continuous visual feedback. Thus, compared to reach training with continuous, but altered visual feedback, subjects who received terminal altered visual feedback of the hand produced significant but smaller reach aftereffects and similar changes in hand proprioception when given extra training. Taken together, results suggest that terminal feedback of the hand is sufficient to drive motor adaptation, and also proprioceptive recalibration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4157547
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41575472014-09-23 Reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration following terminal visual feedback of the hand Barkley, Victoria Salomonczyk, Danielle Cressman, Erin K. Henriques, Denise Y. P. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience We have shown that when subjects reach with continuous, misaligned visual feedback of their hand, their reaches are adapted and proprioceptive sense of hand position is recalibrated to partially match the visual feedback (Salomonczyk et al., 2011). It is unclear if similar changes arise after reaching with visual feedback that is provided only at the end of the reach (i.e., terminal feedback), when there are shorter temporal intervals for subjects to experience concurrent visual and proprioceptive feedback. Subjects reached to targets with an aligned hand-cursor that provided visual feedback at the end of each reach movement across a 99-trial training block, and with a rotated cursor over three successive blocks of 99 trials each. After each block, no cursor reaches, to measure aftereffects, and felt hand positions were measured. Felt hand position was determined by having subjects indicate the position of their unseen hand relative to a reference marker. We found that subjects adapted their reaches following training with rotated terminal visual feedback, yet slightly less (i.e., reach aftereffects were smaller), than subjects from a previous study who experienced continuous visual feedback. Nonetheless, current subjects recalibrated their sense of felt hand position in the direction of the altered visual feedback, but this proprioceptive change increased incrementally over the three rotated training blocks. Final proprioceptive recalibration levels were comparable to our previous studies in which subjects performed the same task with continuous visual feedback. Thus, compared to reach training with continuous, but altered visual feedback, subjects who received terminal altered visual feedback of the hand produced significant but smaller reach aftereffects and similar changes in hand proprioception when given extra training. Taken together, results suggest that terminal feedback of the hand is sufficient to drive motor adaptation, and also proprioceptive recalibration. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4157547/ /pubmed/25249969 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00705 Text en Copyright © 2014 Barkley, Salomonczyk, Cressman and Henriques. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Barkley, Victoria
Salomonczyk, Danielle
Cressman, Erin K.
Henriques, Denise Y. P.
Reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration following terminal visual feedback of the hand
title Reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration following terminal visual feedback of the hand
title_full Reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration following terminal visual feedback of the hand
title_fullStr Reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration following terminal visual feedback of the hand
title_full_unstemmed Reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration following terminal visual feedback of the hand
title_short Reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration following terminal visual feedback of the hand
title_sort reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration following terminal visual feedback of the hand
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4157547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25249969
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00705
work_keys_str_mv AT barkleyvictoria reachadaptationandproprioceptiverecalibrationfollowingterminalvisualfeedbackofthehand
AT salomonczykdanielle reachadaptationandproprioceptiverecalibrationfollowingterminalvisualfeedbackofthehand
AT cressmanerink reachadaptationandproprioceptiverecalibrationfollowingterminalvisualfeedbackofthehand
AT henriquesdeniseyp reachadaptationandproprioceptiverecalibrationfollowingterminalvisualfeedbackofthehand