Cargando…
Pain management with acupuncture in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The utility of acupuncture in managing osteoarthritis symptoms is uncertain. Trial results are conflicting and previous systematic reviews may have overestimated the benefits of acupuncture. METHODS: Two reviewers independently identified randomized controlled trials (up to May 2014) fro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4158087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25151529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-14-312 |
_version_ | 1782333980747497472 |
---|---|
author | Manyanga, Taru Froese, Maria Zarychanski, Ryan Abou-Setta, Ahmed Friesen, Carol Tennenhouse, Michael Shay, Barbara L |
author_facet | Manyanga, Taru Froese, Maria Zarychanski, Ryan Abou-Setta, Ahmed Friesen, Carol Tennenhouse, Michael Shay, Barbara L |
author_sort | Manyanga, Taru |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The utility of acupuncture in managing osteoarthritis symptoms is uncertain. Trial results are conflicting and previous systematic reviews may have overestimated the benefits of acupuncture. METHODS: Two reviewers independently identified randomized controlled trials (up to May 2014) from multiple electronic sources (including PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL) and reference lists of relevant articles, extracted data and assessed risk of bias (Cochrane’s Risk of Bias tool). Pooled data are expressed as mean differences (MD), with 95% confidence intervals (CI) (random-effects model). RESULTS: We included 12 trials (1763 participants) comparing acupuncture to sham acupuncture, no treatment or usual care. We adjudicated most trials to be unclear (64%) or high (9%) risk of bias. Acupuncture use was associated with significant reductions in pain intensity (MD -0.29, 95% CI -0.55 to -0.02, I(2) 0%, 10 trials, 1699 participants), functional mobility (standardized MD -0.34, 95% CI -0.55 to -0.14, I(2) 70%, 9 trials, 1543 participants), health-related quality of life (standardized MD -0.36, 95% CI -0.58 to -0.14, I(2) 50%, 3 trials, 958 participants). Subgroup analysis of pain intensity by intervention duration suggested greater pain intensity reduction with intervention periods greater than 4 weeks (MD -0.38, 95% CI -0.69 to -0.06, I(2) 0%, 6 trials, 1239 participants). CONCLUSIONS: The use of acupuncture is associated with significant reductions in pain intensity, improvement in functional mobility and quality of life. While the differences are not as great as shown by other reviews, current evidence supports the use of acupuncture as an alternative for traditional analgesics in patients with osteoarthritis. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: CRD42013005405. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1472-6882-14-312) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4158087 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41580872014-09-10 Pain management with acupuncture in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Manyanga, Taru Froese, Maria Zarychanski, Ryan Abou-Setta, Ahmed Friesen, Carol Tennenhouse, Michael Shay, Barbara L BMC Complement Altern Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The utility of acupuncture in managing osteoarthritis symptoms is uncertain. Trial results are conflicting and previous systematic reviews may have overestimated the benefits of acupuncture. METHODS: Two reviewers independently identified randomized controlled trials (up to May 2014) from multiple electronic sources (including PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL) and reference lists of relevant articles, extracted data and assessed risk of bias (Cochrane’s Risk of Bias tool). Pooled data are expressed as mean differences (MD), with 95% confidence intervals (CI) (random-effects model). RESULTS: We included 12 trials (1763 participants) comparing acupuncture to sham acupuncture, no treatment or usual care. We adjudicated most trials to be unclear (64%) or high (9%) risk of bias. Acupuncture use was associated with significant reductions in pain intensity (MD -0.29, 95% CI -0.55 to -0.02, I(2) 0%, 10 trials, 1699 participants), functional mobility (standardized MD -0.34, 95% CI -0.55 to -0.14, I(2) 70%, 9 trials, 1543 participants), health-related quality of life (standardized MD -0.36, 95% CI -0.58 to -0.14, I(2) 50%, 3 trials, 958 participants). Subgroup analysis of pain intensity by intervention duration suggested greater pain intensity reduction with intervention periods greater than 4 weeks (MD -0.38, 95% CI -0.69 to -0.06, I(2) 0%, 6 trials, 1239 participants). CONCLUSIONS: The use of acupuncture is associated with significant reductions in pain intensity, improvement in functional mobility and quality of life. While the differences are not as great as shown by other reviews, current evidence supports the use of acupuncture as an alternative for traditional analgesics in patients with osteoarthritis. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: CRD42013005405. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1472-6882-14-312) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4158087/ /pubmed/25151529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-14-312 Text en © Manyanga et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Manyanga, Taru Froese, Maria Zarychanski, Ryan Abou-Setta, Ahmed Friesen, Carol Tennenhouse, Michael Shay, Barbara L Pain management with acupuncture in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Pain management with acupuncture in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Pain management with acupuncture in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Pain management with acupuncture in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Pain management with acupuncture in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Pain management with acupuncture in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | pain management with acupuncture in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4158087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25151529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-14-312 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT manyangataru painmanagementwithacupunctureinosteoarthritisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT froesemaria painmanagementwithacupunctureinosteoarthritisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zarychanskiryan painmanagementwithacupunctureinosteoarthritisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT abousettaahmed painmanagementwithacupunctureinosteoarthritisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT friesencarol painmanagementwithacupunctureinosteoarthritisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tennenhousemichael painmanagementwithacupunctureinosteoarthritisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shaybarbaral painmanagementwithacupunctureinosteoarthritisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |