Cargando…

Pain management with acupuncture in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The utility of acupuncture in managing osteoarthritis symptoms is uncertain. Trial results are conflicting and previous systematic reviews may have overestimated the benefits of acupuncture. METHODS: Two reviewers independently identified randomized controlled trials (up to May 2014) fro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manyanga, Taru, Froese, Maria, Zarychanski, Ryan, Abou-Setta, Ahmed, Friesen, Carol, Tennenhouse, Michael, Shay, Barbara L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4158087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25151529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-14-312
_version_ 1782333980747497472
author Manyanga, Taru
Froese, Maria
Zarychanski, Ryan
Abou-Setta, Ahmed
Friesen, Carol
Tennenhouse, Michael
Shay, Barbara L
author_facet Manyanga, Taru
Froese, Maria
Zarychanski, Ryan
Abou-Setta, Ahmed
Friesen, Carol
Tennenhouse, Michael
Shay, Barbara L
author_sort Manyanga, Taru
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The utility of acupuncture in managing osteoarthritis symptoms is uncertain. Trial results are conflicting and previous systematic reviews may have overestimated the benefits of acupuncture. METHODS: Two reviewers independently identified randomized controlled trials (up to May 2014) from multiple electronic sources (including PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL) and reference lists of relevant articles, extracted data and assessed risk of bias (Cochrane’s Risk of Bias tool). Pooled data are expressed as mean differences (MD), with 95% confidence intervals (CI) (random-effects model). RESULTS: We included 12 trials (1763 participants) comparing acupuncture to sham acupuncture, no treatment or usual care. We adjudicated most trials to be unclear (64%) or high (9%) risk of bias. Acupuncture use was associated with significant reductions in pain intensity (MD -0.29, 95% CI -0.55 to -0.02, I(2) 0%, 10 trials, 1699 participants), functional mobility (standardized MD -0.34, 95% CI -0.55 to -0.14, I(2) 70%, 9 trials, 1543 participants), health-related quality of life (standardized MD -0.36, 95% CI -0.58 to -0.14, I(2) 50%, 3 trials, 958 participants). Subgroup analysis of pain intensity by intervention duration suggested greater pain intensity reduction with intervention periods greater than 4 weeks (MD -0.38, 95% CI -0.69 to -0.06, I(2) 0%, 6 trials, 1239 participants). CONCLUSIONS: The use of acupuncture is associated with significant reductions in pain intensity, improvement in functional mobility and quality of life. While the differences are not as great as shown by other reviews, current evidence supports the use of acupuncture as an alternative for traditional analgesics in patients with osteoarthritis. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: CRD42013005405. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1472-6882-14-312) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4158087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41580872014-09-10 Pain management with acupuncture in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Manyanga, Taru Froese, Maria Zarychanski, Ryan Abou-Setta, Ahmed Friesen, Carol Tennenhouse, Michael Shay, Barbara L BMC Complement Altern Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The utility of acupuncture in managing osteoarthritis symptoms is uncertain. Trial results are conflicting and previous systematic reviews may have overestimated the benefits of acupuncture. METHODS: Two reviewers independently identified randomized controlled trials (up to May 2014) from multiple electronic sources (including PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL) and reference lists of relevant articles, extracted data and assessed risk of bias (Cochrane’s Risk of Bias tool). Pooled data are expressed as mean differences (MD), with 95% confidence intervals (CI) (random-effects model). RESULTS: We included 12 trials (1763 participants) comparing acupuncture to sham acupuncture, no treatment or usual care. We adjudicated most trials to be unclear (64%) or high (9%) risk of bias. Acupuncture use was associated with significant reductions in pain intensity (MD -0.29, 95% CI -0.55 to -0.02, I(2) 0%, 10 trials, 1699 participants), functional mobility (standardized MD -0.34, 95% CI -0.55 to -0.14, I(2) 70%, 9 trials, 1543 participants), health-related quality of life (standardized MD -0.36, 95% CI -0.58 to -0.14, I(2) 50%, 3 trials, 958 participants). Subgroup analysis of pain intensity by intervention duration suggested greater pain intensity reduction with intervention periods greater than 4 weeks (MD -0.38, 95% CI -0.69 to -0.06, I(2) 0%, 6 trials, 1239 participants). CONCLUSIONS: The use of acupuncture is associated with significant reductions in pain intensity, improvement in functional mobility and quality of life. While the differences are not as great as shown by other reviews, current evidence supports the use of acupuncture as an alternative for traditional analgesics in patients with osteoarthritis. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: CRD42013005405. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1472-6882-14-312) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4158087/ /pubmed/25151529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-14-312 Text en © Manyanga et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Manyanga, Taru
Froese, Maria
Zarychanski, Ryan
Abou-Setta, Ahmed
Friesen, Carol
Tennenhouse, Michael
Shay, Barbara L
Pain management with acupuncture in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Pain management with acupuncture in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Pain management with acupuncture in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Pain management with acupuncture in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Pain management with acupuncture in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Pain management with acupuncture in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort pain management with acupuncture in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4158087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25151529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-14-312
work_keys_str_mv AT manyangataru painmanagementwithacupunctureinosteoarthritisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT froesemaria painmanagementwithacupunctureinosteoarthritisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zarychanskiryan painmanagementwithacupunctureinosteoarthritisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT abousettaahmed painmanagementwithacupunctureinosteoarthritisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT friesencarol painmanagementwithacupunctureinosteoarthritisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tennenhousemichael painmanagementwithacupunctureinosteoarthritisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shaybarbaral painmanagementwithacupunctureinosteoarthritisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis