Cargando…

Parameterization and reliability of single-leg balance test assessed with inertial sensors in stroke survivors: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There are no published studies on the parameterisation and reliability of the single-leg stance (SLS) test with inertial sensors in stroke patients. Purpose: to analyse the reliability (intra-observer/inter-observer) and sensitivity of inertial sensors used for the SLS test i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perez-Cruzado, David, González-Sánchez, Manuel, Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio Ignacio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4158088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25174611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-13-127
_version_ 1782333981106110464
author Perez-Cruzado, David
González-Sánchez, Manuel
Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio Ignacio
author_facet Perez-Cruzado, David
González-Sánchez, Manuel
Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio Ignacio
author_sort Perez-Cruzado, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There are no published studies on the parameterisation and reliability of the single-leg stance (SLS) test with inertial sensors in stroke patients. Purpose: to analyse the reliability (intra-observer/inter-observer) and sensitivity of inertial sensors used for the SLS test in stroke patients. Secondary objective: to compare the records of the two inertial sensors (trunk and lumbar) to detect any significant differences in the kinematic data obtained in the SLS test. METHODS: Design: cross-sectional study. While performing the SLS test, two inertial sensors were placed at lumbar (L(5)-S(1)) and trunk regions (T(7)–T(8)). Setting: Laboratory of Biomechanics (Health Science Faculty - University of Málaga). Participants: Four chronic stroke survivors (over 65 yrs old). Measurement: displacement and velocity, Rotation (X-axis), Flexion/Extension (Y-axis), Inclination (Z-axis); Resultant displacement and velocity (V): [Image: see text] Along with SLS kinematic variables, descriptive analyses, differences between sensors locations and intra-observer and inter-observer reliability were also calculated. RESULTS: Differences between the sensors were significant only for left inclination velocity (p = 0.036) and extension displacement in the non-affected leg with eyes open (p = 0.038). Intra-observer reliability of the trunk sensor ranged from 0.889-0.921 for the displacement and 0.849-0.892 for velocity. Intra-observer reliability of the lumbar sensor was between 0.896-0.949 for the displacement and 0.873-0.894 for velocity. Inter-observer reliability of the trunk sensor was between 0.878-0.917 for the displacement and 0.847-0.884 for velocity. Inter-observer reliability of the lumbar sensor ranged from 0.870-0.940 for the displacement and 0.863-0.884 for velocity. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences between the kinematic records made by an inertial sensor during the development of the SLS testing between two inertial sensors placed in the lumbar and thoracic regions. In addition, inertial sensors. Have the potential to be reliable, valid and sensitive instruments for kinematic measurements during SLS testing but further research is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4158088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41580882014-09-10 Parameterization and reliability of single-leg balance test assessed with inertial sensors in stroke survivors: a cross-sectional study Perez-Cruzado, David González-Sánchez, Manuel Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio Ignacio Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There are no published studies on the parameterisation and reliability of the single-leg stance (SLS) test with inertial sensors in stroke patients. Purpose: to analyse the reliability (intra-observer/inter-observer) and sensitivity of inertial sensors used for the SLS test in stroke patients. Secondary objective: to compare the records of the two inertial sensors (trunk and lumbar) to detect any significant differences in the kinematic data obtained in the SLS test. METHODS: Design: cross-sectional study. While performing the SLS test, two inertial sensors were placed at lumbar (L(5)-S(1)) and trunk regions (T(7)–T(8)). Setting: Laboratory of Biomechanics (Health Science Faculty - University of Málaga). Participants: Four chronic stroke survivors (over 65 yrs old). Measurement: displacement and velocity, Rotation (X-axis), Flexion/Extension (Y-axis), Inclination (Z-axis); Resultant displacement and velocity (V): [Image: see text] Along with SLS kinematic variables, descriptive analyses, differences between sensors locations and intra-observer and inter-observer reliability were also calculated. RESULTS: Differences between the sensors were significant only for left inclination velocity (p = 0.036) and extension displacement in the non-affected leg with eyes open (p = 0.038). Intra-observer reliability of the trunk sensor ranged from 0.889-0.921 for the displacement and 0.849-0.892 for velocity. Intra-observer reliability of the lumbar sensor was between 0.896-0.949 for the displacement and 0.873-0.894 for velocity. Inter-observer reliability of the trunk sensor was between 0.878-0.917 for the displacement and 0.847-0.884 for velocity. Inter-observer reliability of the lumbar sensor ranged from 0.870-0.940 for the displacement and 0.863-0.884 for velocity. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences between the kinematic records made by an inertial sensor during the development of the SLS testing between two inertial sensors placed in the lumbar and thoracic regions. In addition, inertial sensors. Have the potential to be reliable, valid and sensitive instruments for kinematic measurements during SLS testing but further research is needed. BioMed Central 2014-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4158088/ /pubmed/25174611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-13-127 Text en © Perez-Cruzado et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Perez-Cruzado, David
González-Sánchez, Manuel
Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio Ignacio
Parameterization and reliability of single-leg balance test assessed with inertial sensors in stroke survivors: a cross-sectional study
title Parameterization and reliability of single-leg balance test assessed with inertial sensors in stroke survivors: a cross-sectional study
title_full Parameterization and reliability of single-leg balance test assessed with inertial sensors in stroke survivors: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Parameterization and reliability of single-leg balance test assessed with inertial sensors in stroke survivors: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Parameterization and reliability of single-leg balance test assessed with inertial sensors in stroke survivors: a cross-sectional study
title_short Parameterization and reliability of single-leg balance test assessed with inertial sensors in stroke survivors: a cross-sectional study
title_sort parameterization and reliability of single-leg balance test assessed with inertial sensors in stroke survivors: a cross-sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4158088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25174611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-13-127
work_keys_str_mv AT perezcruzadodavid parameterizationandreliabilityofsinglelegbalancetestassessedwithinertialsensorsinstrokesurvivorsacrosssectionalstudy
AT gonzalezsanchezmanuel parameterizationandreliabilityofsinglelegbalancetestassessedwithinertialsensorsinstrokesurvivorsacrosssectionalstudy
AT cuestavargasantonioignacio parameterizationandreliabilityofsinglelegbalancetestassessedwithinertialsensorsinstrokesurvivorsacrosssectionalstudy