Cargando…

The safety and efficacy of the tetanus vaccine intramuscularly versus subcutaneously in anticoagulated patients: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: In patients treated with oral anticoagulants, subcutaneous injections of anti-tetanus vaccine are usually recommended to reduce the risk of bleeding, although the effectiveness of the vaccine has only been proven for intramuscular injection. The objective of this study was to compare the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lago-Deibe, Fernando I, Martín-Miguel, Maria-Victoria, Velicia-Peñas, Carmen, Gómez-Serranillos, Isabel Rey, Fontanillo-Fontanillo, Manuela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4158096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25168768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-147
_version_ 1782333983221088256
author Lago-Deibe, Fernando I
Martín-Miguel, Maria-Victoria
Velicia-Peñas, Carmen
Gómez-Serranillos, Isabel Rey
Fontanillo-Fontanillo, Manuela
author_facet Lago-Deibe, Fernando I
Martín-Miguel, Maria-Victoria
Velicia-Peñas, Carmen
Gómez-Serranillos, Isabel Rey
Fontanillo-Fontanillo, Manuela
author_sort Lago-Deibe, Fernando I
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In patients treated with oral anticoagulants, subcutaneous injections of anti-tetanus vaccine are usually recommended to reduce the risk of bleeding, although the effectiveness of the vaccine has only been proven for intramuscular injection. The objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of intramuscular and subcutaneous injections of tetanus-diphtheria vaccine in patients treated with oral anticoagulants. METHODS/DESIGN: We present a prospective, double blinded, clinical trial comparing two groups of patients with oral anticoagulants: one group was administered tetanus-diphtheria vaccine by intramuscular injection, while the other was administered the same vaccine by subcutaneous injection. Allocation to each group was randomized and the duration of the study was six years. Study population: all patients treated with oral anticoagulants, who had been administered with at least one dose of vaccine, at 15 Health Centres in Vigo (Spain), and who agreed to participate in the study. The sample size was 115 patients in each group. The main variables for the safety analysis were the measurement of the brachial diameter, the appearance of basic injuries at the vaccine administration site, the appearance of pain and systemic reactions. The variable used for the efficacy analysis was a significant increase in the titres of anti-tetanus toxoid antibodies. An Intention-to-treat analysis will be performed. Details will be classified according to the administration route, while within each group a 3-tiered stratification will be defined by the administered number of doses. As a measure of association, relative risk will be estimated; the reduction of relative risk will also measured. For safety and to control the confounder effect, a logistic regression analysis will be carried out. As a measure of impact the reduction of absolute risk in relation to the total number of patients to be treated and the Number Needed to Treat will be estimated. CONSORT 2010 guidelines were applied for reporting parallel group randomised trials. DISCUSSION: The most significant difficulties on the project are related to the large number of participating centres, required to obtain a viable study population sample size, and the coordination given the scattering of the centres and researchers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN69942081.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4158096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41580962014-09-10 The safety and efficacy of the tetanus vaccine intramuscularly versus subcutaneously in anticoagulated patients: a randomized clinical trial Lago-Deibe, Fernando I Martín-Miguel, Maria-Victoria Velicia-Peñas, Carmen Gómez-Serranillos, Isabel Rey Fontanillo-Fontanillo, Manuela BMC Fam Pract Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In patients treated with oral anticoagulants, subcutaneous injections of anti-tetanus vaccine are usually recommended to reduce the risk of bleeding, although the effectiveness of the vaccine has only been proven for intramuscular injection. The objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of intramuscular and subcutaneous injections of tetanus-diphtheria vaccine in patients treated with oral anticoagulants. METHODS/DESIGN: We present a prospective, double blinded, clinical trial comparing two groups of patients with oral anticoagulants: one group was administered tetanus-diphtheria vaccine by intramuscular injection, while the other was administered the same vaccine by subcutaneous injection. Allocation to each group was randomized and the duration of the study was six years. Study population: all patients treated with oral anticoagulants, who had been administered with at least one dose of vaccine, at 15 Health Centres in Vigo (Spain), and who agreed to participate in the study. The sample size was 115 patients in each group. The main variables for the safety analysis were the measurement of the brachial diameter, the appearance of basic injuries at the vaccine administration site, the appearance of pain and systemic reactions. The variable used for the efficacy analysis was a significant increase in the titres of anti-tetanus toxoid antibodies. An Intention-to-treat analysis will be performed. Details will be classified according to the administration route, while within each group a 3-tiered stratification will be defined by the administered number of doses. As a measure of association, relative risk will be estimated; the reduction of relative risk will also measured. For safety and to control the confounder effect, a logistic regression analysis will be carried out. As a measure of impact the reduction of absolute risk in relation to the total number of patients to be treated and the Number Needed to Treat will be estimated. CONSORT 2010 guidelines were applied for reporting parallel group randomised trials. DISCUSSION: The most significant difficulties on the project are related to the large number of participating centres, required to obtain a viable study population sample size, and the coordination given the scattering of the centres and researchers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN69942081. BioMed Central 2014-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4158096/ /pubmed/25168768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-147 Text en © Lago-Deibe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Lago-Deibe, Fernando I
Martín-Miguel, Maria-Victoria
Velicia-Peñas, Carmen
Gómez-Serranillos, Isabel Rey
Fontanillo-Fontanillo, Manuela
The safety and efficacy of the tetanus vaccine intramuscularly versus subcutaneously in anticoagulated patients: a randomized clinical trial
title The safety and efficacy of the tetanus vaccine intramuscularly versus subcutaneously in anticoagulated patients: a randomized clinical trial
title_full The safety and efficacy of the tetanus vaccine intramuscularly versus subcutaneously in anticoagulated patients: a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr The safety and efficacy of the tetanus vaccine intramuscularly versus subcutaneously in anticoagulated patients: a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed The safety and efficacy of the tetanus vaccine intramuscularly versus subcutaneously in anticoagulated patients: a randomized clinical trial
title_short The safety and efficacy of the tetanus vaccine intramuscularly versus subcutaneously in anticoagulated patients: a randomized clinical trial
title_sort safety and efficacy of the tetanus vaccine intramuscularly versus subcutaneously in anticoagulated patients: a randomized clinical trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4158096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25168768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-147
work_keys_str_mv AT lagodeibefernandoi thesafetyandefficacyofthetetanusvaccineintramuscularlyversussubcutaneouslyinanticoagulatedpatientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT martinmiguelmariavictoria thesafetyandefficacyofthetetanusvaccineintramuscularlyversussubcutaneouslyinanticoagulatedpatientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT veliciapenascarmen thesafetyandefficacyofthetetanusvaccineintramuscularlyversussubcutaneouslyinanticoagulatedpatientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT gomezserranillosisabelrey thesafetyandefficacyofthetetanusvaccineintramuscularlyversussubcutaneouslyinanticoagulatedpatientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT fontanillofontanillomanuela thesafetyandefficacyofthetetanusvaccineintramuscularlyversussubcutaneouslyinanticoagulatedpatientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT lagodeibefernandoi safetyandefficacyofthetetanusvaccineintramuscularlyversussubcutaneouslyinanticoagulatedpatientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT martinmiguelmariavictoria safetyandefficacyofthetetanusvaccineintramuscularlyversussubcutaneouslyinanticoagulatedpatientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT veliciapenascarmen safetyandefficacyofthetetanusvaccineintramuscularlyversussubcutaneouslyinanticoagulatedpatientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT gomezserranillosisabelrey safetyandefficacyofthetetanusvaccineintramuscularlyversussubcutaneouslyinanticoagulatedpatientsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT fontanillofontanillomanuela safetyandefficacyofthetetanusvaccineintramuscularlyversussubcutaneouslyinanticoagulatedpatientsarandomizedclinicaltrial