Cargando…

Does carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum enhance wound metastases following laparoscopic abdominal tumor surgery? A meta-analysis of 20 randomized control studies

The mechanisms involved in the development of wound metastasis following laparoscopic abdominal tumor surgery remain unclear. The aim of this study was to accurately assess whether the duration of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum (CDP) during laparoscopic abdominal tumor surgery enhances wound metast...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mo, Xianwei, Yang, Yang, Lai, Hao, Xiao, Jun, He, Ke, Chen, Jiansi, Lin, Yuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4158183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24744141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-014-1812-5
_version_ 1782334006800416768
author Mo, Xianwei
Yang, Yang
Lai, Hao
Xiao, Jun
He, Ke
Chen, Jiansi
Lin, Yuan
author_facet Mo, Xianwei
Yang, Yang
Lai, Hao
Xiao, Jun
He, Ke
Chen, Jiansi
Lin, Yuan
author_sort Mo, Xianwei
collection PubMed
description The mechanisms involved in the development of wound metastasis following laparoscopic abdominal tumor surgery remain unclear. The aim of this study was to accurately assess whether the duration of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum (CDP) during laparoscopic abdominal tumor surgery enhances wound metastases. We conducted a systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase through December 2013 to identify animal experiments comparing wound recurrence between laparoscopic and gasless laparoscopic procedures or open procedures. The outcome of interest was the number of animals with a wound tumor. Meta-regression was used to assess whether heterogeneity was explained by study level covariates (animal model, study size, CDP pressure, duration, and evaluated time). Twenty randomized control studies involving 1,229 animals were included. Wound recurrence was not significant in the laparoscopic surgery (LP) vs. gasless laparoscopic surgery (GLP) subgroups [odds ratio (OR), 2.23; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.90–5.55; P = 0.08) or the LP vs. laparotomy (LA) subgroups (OR, 0.97; 95 % CI, 0.31–3.00; P = 0.08). Overall postoperative wound recurrence results were not significantly different between the study groups and controls (OR, 1.47; 95 % CI, 0.74–2.92; P = 0.28). A meta-regression analysis showed that the outcome was not correlated with the covariates (animal model: P = 0.82; evaluated time: P = 0.30; pressure of CDP: P = 0.12; duration time: P = 0.80). Current evidence suggests that CDP does not enhance wound metastases following laparoscopic abdominal tumor surgery. Additional large sample, well-designed, randomized, controlled trials are needed to further confirm whether CDP duration in laparoscopic abdominal tumor surgery significantly enhances wound recurrence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4158183
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41581832014-09-10 Does carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum enhance wound metastases following laparoscopic abdominal tumor surgery? A meta-analysis of 20 randomized control studies Mo, Xianwei Yang, Yang Lai, Hao Xiao, Jun He, Ke Chen, Jiansi Lin, Yuan Tumour Biol Review The mechanisms involved in the development of wound metastasis following laparoscopic abdominal tumor surgery remain unclear. The aim of this study was to accurately assess whether the duration of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum (CDP) during laparoscopic abdominal tumor surgery enhances wound metastases. We conducted a systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase through December 2013 to identify animal experiments comparing wound recurrence between laparoscopic and gasless laparoscopic procedures or open procedures. The outcome of interest was the number of animals with a wound tumor. Meta-regression was used to assess whether heterogeneity was explained by study level covariates (animal model, study size, CDP pressure, duration, and evaluated time). Twenty randomized control studies involving 1,229 animals were included. Wound recurrence was not significant in the laparoscopic surgery (LP) vs. gasless laparoscopic surgery (GLP) subgroups [odds ratio (OR), 2.23; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.90–5.55; P = 0.08) or the LP vs. laparotomy (LA) subgroups (OR, 0.97; 95 % CI, 0.31–3.00; P = 0.08). Overall postoperative wound recurrence results were not significantly different between the study groups and controls (OR, 1.47; 95 % CI, 0.74–2.92; P = 0.28). A meta-regression analysis showed that the outcome was not correlated with the covariates (animal model: P = 0.82; evaluated time: P = 0.30; pressure of CDP: P = 0.12; duration time: P = 0.80). Current evidence suggests that CDP does not enhance wound metastases following laparoscopic abdominal tumor surgery. Additional large sample, well-designed, randomized, controlled trials are needed to further confirm whether CDP duration in laparoscopic abdominal tumor surgery significantly enhances wound recurrence. Springer Netherlands 2014-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4158183/ /pubmed/24744141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-014-1812-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Review
Mo, Xianwei
Yang, Yang
Lai, Hao
Xiao, Jun
He, Ke
Chen, Jiansi
Lin, Yuan
Does carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum enhance wound metastases following laparoscopic abdominal tumor surgery? A meta-analysis of 20 randomized control studies
title Does carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum enhance wound metastases following laparoscopic abdominal tumor surgery? A meta-analysis of 20 randomized control studies
title_full Does carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum enhance wound metastases following laparoscopic abdominal tumor surgery? A meta-analysis of 20 randomized control studies
title_fullStr Does carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum enhance wound metastases following laparoscopic abdominal tumor surgery? A meta-analysis of 20 randomized control studies
title_full_unstemmed Does carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum enhance wound metastases following laparoscopic abdominal tumor surgery? A meta-analysis of 20 randomized control studies
title_short Does carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum enhance wound metastases following laparoscopic abdominal tumor surgery? A meta-analysis of 20 randomized control studies
title_sort does carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum enhance wound metastases following laparoscopic abdominal tumor surgery? a meta-analysis of 20 randomized control studies
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4158183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24744141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-014-1812-5
work_keys_str_mv AT moxianwei doescarbondioxidepneumoperitoneumenhancewoundmetastasesfollowinglaparoscopicabdominaltumorsurgeryametaanalysisof20randomizedcontrolstudies
AT yangyang doescarbondioxidepneumoperitoneumenhancewoundmetastasesfollowinglaparoscopicabdominaltumorsurgeryametaanalysisof20randomizedcontrolstudies
AT laihao doescarbondioxidepneumoperitoneumenhancewoundmetastasesfollowinglaparoscopicabdominaltumorsurgeryametaanalysisof20randomizedcontrolstudies
AT xiaojun doescarbondioxidepneumoperitoneumenhancewoundmetastasesfollowinglaparoscopicabdominaltumorsurgeryametaanalysisof20randomizedcontrolstudies
AT heke doescarbondioxidepneumoperitoneumenhancewoundmetastasesfollowinglaparoscopicabdominaltumorsurgeryametaanalysisof20randomizedcontrolstudies
AT chenjiansi doescarbondioxidepneumoperitoneumenhancewoundmetastasesfollowinglaparoscopicabdominaltumorsurgeryametaanalysisof20randomizedcontrolstudies
AT linyuan doescarbondioxidepneumoperitoneumenhancewoundmetastasesfollowinglaparoscopicabdominaltumorsurgeryametaanalysisof20randomizedcontrolstudies