Cargando…

Comparison of Enteral versus Intravenous Potassium Supplementation in hypokalaemia in postcardiac surgery paediatric cardiac intensive care patients: prospective open label randomised control trial (EIPS)

BACKGROUND: Hypokalaemia is frequently encountered in the daily clinical practices of a paediatric cardiac intensive care unit (PCICU). It is a strong independent predictor of mortality in patients with heart failure. Thus, prompt potassium replacement therapy holds pivotal importance in therapy for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merchant, Quratulain, Rehman Siddiqui, Naveed ur, Rehmat, Amina, Amanullah, Muneer, Haq, Anwar ul, Hasan, Babar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4158199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25190615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005124
_version_ 1782334010538590208
author Merchant, Quratulain
Rehman Siddiqui, Naveed ur
Rehmat, Amina
Amanullah, Muneer
Haq, Anwar ul
Hasan, Babar
author_facet Merchant, Quratulain
Rehman Siddiqui, Naveed ur
Rehmat, Amina
Amanullah, Muneer
Haq, Anwar ul
Hasan, Babar
author_sort Merchant, Quratulain
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hypokalaemia is frequently encountered in the daily clinical practices of a paediatric cardiac intensive care unit (PCICU). It is a strong independent predictor of mortality in patients with heart failure. Thus, prompt potassium replacement therapy holds pivotal importance in therapy for hypokalaemia. Although intravenous potassium replacement (IVPR) in hypokalaemia is the preferred route in most intensive care settings, it is associated with known safety risks and can lead to arrhythmias, cardiac arrest and death if inappropriately administered. Enteral potassium replacement (EPR), with its superior safety profile, may be a better alternative to IVPR. OUTCOME: Primary outcome To compare the efficacy EPR and IVPR for treatment of hypokalaemia. Secondary outcome measures include a comparison of adverse effects (hyperkalaemia, diarrhoea, gastrointestinal bleeds, nausea and vomiting) after EPR and IVPR and a comparison of the number of dose/s required to achieve resolution of hypokalaemia for each episode of hypokalaemia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Enteral Versus Intravenous Potassium Supplementation trial is designed as a randomised, controlled, non-blinded trial with two arms. Intervention arms will be block randomised on alternate weeks for IVPR and EPR. Recruited patients will receive treatment accordingly. For analysis, the percentage change in serum potassium levels in mEq/L after each event of potassium replacement in both arms will be used as an end point to compare the efficacy EPR and IVPR for treatment of hypokalaemia. STUDY SETTING: The study will be conducted at the PCICU at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Ethics Review Committee and Clinical Trials Unit at The Aga Khan University with respect to scientific content and compliance with applicable research and human subjects regulations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This trial is registered at Clinical Trials.Gov. Registration number: NCT02015962.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4158199
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41581992014-09-18 Comparison of Enteral versus Intravenous Potassium Supplementation in hypokalaemia in postcardiac surgery paediatric cardiac intensive care patients: prospective open label randomised control trial (EIPS) Merchant, Quratulain Rehman Siddiqui, Naveed ur Rehmat, Amina Amanullah, Muneer Haq, Anwar ul Hasan, Babar BMJ Open Intensive Care BACKGROUND: Hypokalaemia is frequently encountered in the daily clinical practices of a paediatric cardiac intensive care unit (PCICU). It is a strong independent predictor of mortality in patients with heart failure. Thus, prompt potassium replacement therapy holds pivotal importance in therapy for hypokalaemia. Although intravenous potassium replacement (IVPR) in hypokalaemia is the preferred route in most intensive care settings, it is associated with known safety risks and can lead to arrhythmias, cardiac arrest and death if inappropriately administered. Enteral potassium replacement (EPR), with its superior safety profile, may be a better alternative to IVPR. OUTCOME: Primary outcome To compare the efficacy EPR and IVPR for treatment of hypokalaemia. Secondary outcome measures include a comparison of adverse effects (hyperkalaemia, diarrhoea, gastrointestinal bleeds, nausea and vomiting) after EPR and IVPR and a comparison of the number of dose/s required to achieve resolution of hypokalaemia for each episode of hypokalaemia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Enteral Versus Intravenous Potassium Supplementation trial is designed as a randomised, controlled, non-blinded trial with two arms. Intervention arms will be block randomised on alternate weeks for IVPR and EPR. Recruited patients will receive treatment accordingly. For analysis, the percentage change in serum potassium levels in mEq/L after each event of potassium replacement in both arms will be used as an end point to compare the efficacy EPR and IVPR for treatment of hypokalaemia. STUDY SETTING: The study will be conducted at the PCICU at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Ethics Review Committee and Clinical Trials Unit at The Aga Khan University with respect to scientific content and compliance with applicable research and human subjects regulations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This trial is registered at Clinical Trials.Gov. Registration number: NCT02015962. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4158199/ /pubmed/25190615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005124 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Intensive Care
Merchant, Quratulain
Rehman Siddiqui, Naveed ur
Rehmat, Amina
Amanullah, Muneer
Haq, Anwar ul
Hasan, Babar
Comparison of Enteral versus Intravenous Potassium Supplementation in hypokalaemia in postcardiac surgery paediatric cardiac intensive care patients: prospective open label randomised control trial (EIPS)
title Comparison of Enteral versus Intravenous Potassium Supplementation in hypokalaemia in postcardiac surgery paediatric cardiac intensive care patients: prospective open label randomised control trial (EIPS)
title_full Comparison of Enteral versus Intravenous Potassium Supplementation in hypokalaemia in postcardiac surgery paediatric cardiac intensive care patients: prospective open label randomised control trial (EIPS)
title_fullStr Comparison of Enteral versus Intravenous Potassium Supplementation in hypokalaemia in postcardiac surgery paediatric cardiac intensive care patients: prospective open label randomised control trial (EIPS)
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Enteral versus Intravenous Potassium Supplementation in hypokalaemia in postcardiac surgery paediatric cardiac intensive care patients: prospective open label randomised control trial (EIPS)
title_short Comparison of Enteral versus Intravenous Potassium Supplementation in hypokalaemia in postcardiac surgery paediatric cardiac intensive care patients: prospective open label randomised control trial (EIPS)
title_sort comparison of enteral versus intravenous potassium supplementation in hypokalaemia in postcardiac surgery paediatric cardiac intensive care patients: prospective open label randomised control trial (eips)
topic Intensive Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4158199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25190615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005124
work_keys_str_mv AT merchantquratulain comparisonofenteralversusintravenouspotassiumsupplementationinhypokalaemiainpostcardiacsurgerypaediatriccardiacintensivecarepatientsprospectiveopenlabelrandomisedcontroltrialeips
AT rehmansiddiquinaveedur comparisonofenteralversusintravenouspotassiumsupplementationinhypokalaemiainpostcardiacsurgerypaediatriccardiacintensivecarepatientsprospectiveopenlabelrandomisedcontroltrialeips
AT rehmatamina comparisonofenteralversusintravenouspotassiumsupplementationinhypokalaemiainpostcardiacsurgerypaediatriccardiacintensivecarepatientsprospectiveopenlabelrandomisedcontroltrialeips
AT amanullahmuneer comparisonofenteralversusintravenouspotassiumsupplementationinhypokalaemiainpostcardiacsurgerypaediatriccardiacintensivecarepatientsprospectiveopenlabelrandomisedcontroltrialeips
AT haqanwarul comparisonofenteralversusintravenouspotassiumsupplementationinhypokalaemiainpostcardiacsurgerypaediatriccardiacintensivecarepatientsprospectiveopenlabelrandomisedcontroltrialeips
AT hasanbabar comparisonofenteralversusintravenouspotassiumsupplementationinhypokalaemiainpostcardiacsurgerypaediatriccardiacintensivecarepatientsprospectiveopenlabelrandomisedcontroltrialeips