Cargando…
Patients’ online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic interpretative review
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of providing patients online access to their electronic health record (EHR) and linked transactional services on the provision, quality and safety of healthcare. The objectives are also to identify and understand: barriers and facilitators for providing online a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4158217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25200561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006021 |
_version_ | 1782334012841263104 |
---|---|
author | de Lusignan, Simon Mold, Freda Sheikh, Aziz Majeed, Azeem Wyatt, Jeremy C Quinn, Tom Cavill, Mary Gronlund, Toto Anne Franco, Christina Chauhan, Umesh Blakey, Hannah Kataria, Neha Barker, Fiona Ellis, Beverley Koczan, Phil Arvanitis, Theodoros N McCarthy, Mary Jones, Simon Rafi, Imran |
author_facet | de Lusignan, Simon Mold, Freda Sheikh, Aziz Majeed, Azeem Wyatt, Jeremy C Quinn, Tom Cavill, Mary Gronlund, Toto Anne Franco, Christina Chauhan, Umesh Blakey, Hannah Kataria, Neha Barker, Fiona Ellis, Beverley Koczan, Phil Arvanitis, Theodoros N McCarthy, Mary Jones, Simon Rafi, Imran |
author_sort | de Lusignan, Simon |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of providing patients online access to their electronic health record (EHR) and linked transactional services on the provision, quality and safety of healthcare. The objectives are also to identify and understand: barriers and facilitators for providing online access to their records and services for primary care workers; and their association with organisational/IT system issues. SETTING: Primary care. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 143 studies were included. 17 were experimental in design and subject to risk of bias assessment, which is reported in a separate paper. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria have also been published elsewhere in the protocol. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Our primary outcome measure was change in quality or safety as a result of implementation or utilisation of online records/transactional services. RESULTS: No studies reported changes in health outcomes; though eight detected medication errors and seven reported improved uptake of preventative care. Professional concerns over privacy were reported in 14 studies. 18 studies reported concern over potential increased workload; with some showing an increase workload in email or online messaging; telephone contact remaining unchanged, and face-to face contact staying the same or falling. Owing to heterogeneity in reporting overall workload change was hard to predict. 10 studies reported how online access offered convenience, primarily for more advantaged patients, who were largely highly satisfied with the process when clinician responses were prompt. CONCLUSIONS: Patient online access and services offer increased convenience and satisfaction. However, professionals were concerned about impact on workload and risk to privacy. Studies correcting medication errors may improve patient safety. There may need to be a redesign of the business process to engage health professionals in online access and of the EHR to make it friendlier and provide equity of access to a wider group of patients. A1. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42012003091. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4158217 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41582172014-09-18 Patients’ online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic interpretative review de Lusignan, Simon Mold, Freda Sheikh, Aziz Majeed, Azeem Wyatt, Jeremy C Quinn, Tom Cavill, Mary Gronlund, Toto Anne Franco, Christina Chauhan, Umesh Blakey, Hannah Kataria, Neha Barker, Fiona Ellis, Beverley Koczan, Phil Arvanitis, Theodoros N McCarthy, Mary Jones, Simon Rafi, Imran BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of providing patients online access to their electronic health record (EHR) and linked transactional services on the provision, quality and safety of healthcare. The objectives are also to identify and understand: barriers and facilitators for providing online access to their records and services for primary care workers; and their association with organisational/IT system issues. SETTING: Primary care. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 143 studies were included. 17 were experimental in design and subject to risk of bias assessment, which is reported in a separate paper. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria have also been published elsewhere in the protocol. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Our primary outcome measure was change in quality or safety as a result of implementation or utilisation of online records/transactional services. RESULTS: No studies reported changes in health outcomes; though eight detected medication errors and seven reported improved uptake of preventative care. Professional concerns over privacy were reported in 14 studies. 18 studies reported concern over potential increased workload; with some showing an increase workload in email or online messaging; telephone contact remaining unchanged, and face-to face contact staying the same or falling. Owing to heterogeneity in reporting overall workload change was hard to predict. 10 studies reported how online access offered convenience, primarily for more advantaged patients, who were largely highly satisfied with the process when clinician responses were prompt. CONCLUSIONS: Patient online access and services offer increased convenience and satisfaction. However, professionals were concerned about impact on workload and risk to privacy. Studies correcting medication errors may improve patient safety. There may need to be a redesign of the business process to engage health professionals in online access and of the EHR to make it friendlier and provide equity of access to a wider group of patients. A1. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42012003091. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4158217/ /pubmed/25200561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006021 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice de Lusignan, Simon Mold, Freda Sheikh, Aziz Majeed, Azeem Wyatt, Jeremy C Quinn, Tom Cavill, Mary Gronlund, Toto Anne Franco, Christina Chauhan, Umesh Blakey, Hannah Kataria, Neha Barker, Fiona Ellis, Beverley Koczan, Phil Arvanitis, Theodoros N McCarthy, Mary Jones, Simon Rafi, Imran Patients’ online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic interpretative review |
title | Patients’ online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic interpretative review |
title_full | Patients’ online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic interpretative review |
title_fullStr | Patients’ online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic interpretative review |
title_full_unstemmed | Patients’ online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic interpretative review |
title_short | Patients’ online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic interpretative review |
title_sort | patients’ online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic interpretative review |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4158217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25200561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT delusignansimon patientsonlineaccesstotheirelectronichealthrecordsandlinkedonlineservicesasystematicinterpretativereview AT moldfreda patientsonlineaccesstotheirelectronichealthrecordsandlinkedonlineservicesasystematicinterpretativereview AT sheikhaziz patientsonlineaccesstotheirelectronichealthrecordsandlinkedonlineservicesasystematicinterpretativereview AT majeedazeem patientsonlineaccesstotheirelectronichealthrecordsandlinkedonlineservicesasystematicinterpretativereview AT wyattjeremyc patientsonlineaccesstotheirelectronichealthrecordsandlinkedonlineservicesasystematicinterpretativereview AT quinntom patientsonlineaccesstotheirelectronichealthrecordsandlinkedonlineservicesasystematicinterpretativereview AT cavillmary patientsonlineaccesstotheirelectronichealthrecordsandlinkedonlineservicesasystematicinterpretativereview AT gronlundtotoanne patientsonlineaccesstotheirelectronichealthrecordsandlinkedonlineservicesasystematicinterpretativereview AT francochristina patientsonlineaccesstotheirelectronichealthrecordsandlinkedonlineservicesasystematicinterpretativereview AT chauhanumesh patientsonlineaccesstotheirelectronichealthrecordsandlinkedonlineservicesasystematicinterpretativereview AT blakeyhannah patientsonlineaccesstotheirelectronichealthrecordsandlinkedonlineservicesasystematicinterpretativereview AT katarianeha patientsonlineaccesstotheirelectronichealthrecordsandlinkedonlineservicesasystematicinterpretativereview AT barkerfiona patientsonlineaccesstotheirelectronichealthrecordsandlinkedonlineservicesasystematicinterpretativereview AT ellisbeverley patientsonlineaccesstotheirelectronichealthrecordsandlinkedonlineservicesasystematicinterpretativereview AT koczanphil patientsonlineaccesstotheirelectronichealthrecordsandlinkedonlineservicesasystematicinterpretativereview AT arvanitistheodorosn patientsonlineaccesstotheirelectronichealthrecordsandlinkedonlineservicesasystematicinterpretativereview AT mccarthymary patientsonlineaccesstotheirelectronichealthrecordsandlinkedonlineservicesasystematicinterpretativereview AT jonessimon patientsonlineaccesstotheirelectronichealthrecordsandlinkedonlineservicesasystematicinterpretativereview AT rafiimran patientsonlineaccesstotheirelectronichealthrecordsandlinkedonlineservicesasystematicinterpretativereview |