Cargando…

Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor with primary perineal wound closure after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer (BIOPEX-study)

BACKGROUND: Primary perineal wound closure after conventional abdominoperineal resection (cAPR) for rectal cancer has been the standard of care for many years. Since the introduction of neo-adjuvant radiotherapy and the extralevator APR (eAPR), oncological outcome has been improved, but at the cost...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Musters, Gijsbert D, Bemelman, Willem A, Bosker, Robbert JI, Burger, Jacobus WA, van Duijvendijk, Peter, van Etten, Boudewijn, van Geloven, Anna AW, de Graaf, Eelco JR, Hoff, Christiaan, de Korte, Niels, Leijtens, Jeroen WA, Rutten, Harm JT, Singh, Baljit, van de Ven, Anthony, Vuylsteke, Ronald JCLM, de wilt, Johannes HW, Dijkgraaf, Marcel GW, Tanis, Pieter J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4158342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25163547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-58
_version_ 1782334036378648576
author Musters, Gijsbert D
Bemelman, Willem A
Bosker, Robbert JI
Burger, Jacobus WA
van Duijvendijk, Peter
van Etten, Boudewijn
van Geloven, Anna AW
de Graaf, Eelco JR
Hoff, Christiaan
de Korte, Niels
Leijtens, Jeroen WA
Rutten, Harm JT
Singh, Baljit
van de Ven, Anthony
Vuylsteke, Ronald JCLM
de wilt, Johannes HW
Dijkgraaf, Marcel GW
Tanis, Pieter J
author_facet Musters, Gijsbert D
Bemelman, Willem A
Bosker, Robbert JI
Burger, Jacobus WA
van Duijvendijk, Peter
van Etten, Boudewijn
van Geloven, Anna AW
de Graaf, Eelco JR
Hoff, Christiaan
de Korte, Niels
Leijtens, Jeroen WA
Rutten, Harm JT
Singh, Baljit
van de Ven, Anthony
Vuylsteke, Ronald JCLM
de wilt, Johannes HW
Dijkgraaf, Marcel GW
Tanis, Pieter J
author_sort Musters, Gijsbert D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Primary perineal wound closure after conventional abdominoperineal resection (cAPR) for rectal cancer has been the standard of care for many years. Since the introduction of neo-adjuvant radiotherapy and the extralevator APR (eAPR), oncological outcome has been improved, but at the cost of increased rates of perineal wound healing problems and perineal hernia. This has progressively increased the use of biological meshes, although not supported by sufficient evidence. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of pelvic floor reconstruction using a biological mesh after standardized eAPR with neo-adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy compared to primary perineal wound closure. METHODS/DESIGN: In this multicentre randomized controlled trial, patients with a clinical diagnosis of primary rectal cancer who are scheduled for eAPR after neo-adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy will be considered eligible. Exclusion criteria are prior radiotherapy, sacral resection above S4/S5, allergy to pig products or polysorbate, collagen disorders, and severe systemic diseases affecting wound healing, except for diabetes. After informed consent, 104 patients will be randomized between standard care using primary wound closure of the perineum and the experimental arm consisting of suturing a biological mesh derived from porcine dermis in the pelvic floor defect, followed by perineal closure similar to the control arm. Patients will be followed for one year after the intervention and outcome assessors and patients will be blinded for the study treatment. The primary endpoint is the percentage of uncomplicated perineal wound healing, defined as a Southampton wound score of less than II on day 30. Secondary endpoints are hospital stay, incidence of perineal hernia, quality of life, and costs. DISCUSSION: The BIOPEX-study is the first randomized controlled multicentre study to determine the additive value of using a biological mesh for perineal wound closure after eAPR with neo-adjuvant radiotherapy compared to primary perineal wound closure with regard to perineal wound healing and the occurrence of perineal hernia. TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01927497 (Clinicaltrial.gov).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4158342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41583422014-09-10 Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor with primary perineal wound closure after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer (BIOPEX-study) Musters, Gijsbert D Bemelman, Willem A Bosker, Robbert JI Burger, Jacobus WA van Duijvendijk, Peter van Etten, Boudewijn van Geloven, Anna AW de Graaf, Eelco JR Hoff, Christiaan de Korte, Niels Leijtens, Jeroen WA Rutten, Harm JT Singh, Baljit van de Ven, Anthony Vuylsteke, Ronald JCLM de wilt, Johannes HW Dijkgraaf, Marcel GW Tanis, Pieter J BMC Surg Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Primary perineal wound closure after conventional abdominoperineal resection (cAPR) for rectal cancer has been the standard of care for many years. Since the introduction of neo-adjuvant radiotherapy and the extralevator APR (eAPR), oncological outcome has been improved, but at the cost of increased rates of perineal wound healing problems and perineal hernia. This has progressively increased the use of biological meshes, although not supported by sufficient evidence. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of pelvic floor reconstruction using a biological mesh after standardized eAPR with neo-adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy compared to primary perineal wound closure. METHODS/DESIGN: In this multicentre randomized controlled trial, patients with a clinical diagnosis of primary rectal cancer who are scheduled for eAPR after neo-adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy will be considered eligible. Exclusion criteria are prior radiotherapy, sacral resection above S4/S5, allergy to pig products or polysorbate, collagen disorders, and severe systemic diseases affecting wound healing, except for diabetes. After informed consent, 104 patients will be randomized between standard care using primary wound closure of the perineum and the experimental arm consisting of suturing a biological mesh derived from porcine dermis in the pelvic floor defect, followed by perineal closure similar to the control arm. Patients will be followed for one year after the intervention and outcome assessors and patients will be blinded for the study treatment. The primary endpoint is the percentage of uncomplicated perineal wound healing, defined as a Southampton wound score of less than II on day 30. Secondary endpoints are hospital stay, incidence of perineal hernia, quality of life, and costs. DISCUSSION: The BIOPEX-study is the first randomized controlled multicentre study to determine the additive value of using a biological mesh for perineal wound closure after eAPR with neo-adjuvant radiotherapy compared to primary perineal wound closure with regard to perineal wound healing and the occurrence of perineal hernia. TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01927497 (Clinicaltrial.gov). BioMed Central 2014-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4158342/ /pubmed/25163547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-58 Text en Copyright © 2014 Musters et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Musters, Gijsbert D
Bemelman, Willem A
Bosker, Robbert JI
Burger, Jacobus WA
van Duijvendijk, Peter
van Etten, Boudewijn
van Geloven, Anna AW
de Graaf, Eelco JR
Hoff, Christiaan
de Korte, Niels
Leijtens, Jeroen WA
Rutten, Harm JT
Singh, Baljit
van de Ven, Anthony
Vuylsteke, Ronald JCLM
de wilt, Johannes HW
Dijkgraaf, Marcel GW
Tanis, Pieter J
Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor with primary perineal wound closure after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer (BIOPEX-study)
title Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor with primary perineal wound closure after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer (BIOPEX-study)
title_full Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor with primary perineal wound closure after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer (BIOPEX-study)
title_fullStr Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor with primary perineal wound closure after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer (BIOPEX-study)
title_full_unstemmed Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor with primary perineal wound closure after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer (BIOPEX-study)
title_short Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor with primary perineal wound closure after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer (BIOPEX-study)
title_sort randomized controlled multicentre study comparing biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor with primary perineal wound closure after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer (biopex-study)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4158342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25163547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-58
work_keys_str_mv AT mustersgijsbertd randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy
AT bemelmanwillema randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy
AT boskerrobbertji randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy
AT burgerjacobuswa randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy
AT vanduijvendijkpeter randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy
AT vanettenboudewijn randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy
AT vangelovenannaaw randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy
AT degraafeelcojr randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy
AT hoffchristiaan randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy
AT dekorteniels randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy
AT leijtensjeroenwa randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy
AT ruttenharmjt randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy
AT singhbaljit randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy
AT vandevenanthony randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy
AT vuylstekeronaldjclm randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy
AT dewiltjohanneshw randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy
AT dijkgraafmarcelgw randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy
AT tanispieterj randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy