Cargando…
Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor with primary perineal wound closure after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer (BIOPEX-study)
BACKGROUND: Primary perineal wound closure after conventional abdominoperineal resection (cAPR) for rectal cancer has been the standard of care for many years. Since the introduction of neo-adjuvant radiotherapy and the extralevator APR (eAPR), oncological outcome has been improved, but at the cost...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4158342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25163547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-58 |
_version_ | 1782334036378648576 |
---|---|
author | Musters, Gijsbert D Bemelman, Willem A Bosker, Robbert JI Burger, Jacobus WA van Duijvendijk, Peter van Etten, Boudewijn van Geloven, Anna AW de Graaf, Eelco JR Hoff, Christiaan de Korte, Niels Leijtens, Jeroen WA Rutten, Harm JT Singh, Baljit van de Ven, Anthony Vuylsteke, Ronald JCLM de wilt, Johannes HW Dijkgraaf, Marcel GW Tanis, Pieter J |
author_facet | Musters, Gijsbert D Bemelman, Willem A Bosker, Robbert JI Burger, Jacobus WA van Duijvendijk, Peter van Etten, Boudewijn van Geloven, Anna AW de Graaf, Eelco JR Hoff, Christiaan de Korte, Niels Leijtens, Jeroen WA Rutten, Harm JT Singh, Baljit van de Ven, Anthony Vuylsteke, Ronald JCLM de wilt, Johannes HW Dijkgraaf, Marcel GW Tanis, Pieter J |
author_sort | Musters, Gijsbert D |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Primary perineal wound closure after conventional abdominoperineal resection (cAPR) for rectal cancer has been the standard of care for many years. Since the introduction of neo-adjuvant radiotherapy and the extralevator APR (eAPR), oncological outcome has been improved, but at the cost of increased rates of perineal wound healing problems and perineal hernia. This has progressively increased the use of biological meshes, although not supported by sufficient evidence. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of pelvic floor reconstruction using a biological mesh after standardized eAPR with neo-adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy compared to primary perineal wound closure. METHODS/DESIGN: In this multicentre randomized controlled trial, patients with a clinical diagnosis of primary rectal cancer who are scheduled for eAPR after neo-adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy will be considered eligible. Exclusion criteria are prior radiotherapy, sacral resection above S4/S5, allergy to pig products or polysorbate, collagen disorders, and severe systemic diseases affecting wound healing, except for diabetes. After informed consent, 104 patients will be randomized between standard care using primary wound closure of the perineum and the experimental arm consisting of suturing a biological mesh derived from porcine dermis in the pelvic floor defect, followed by perineal closure similar to the control arm. Patients will be followed for one year after the intervention and outcome assessors and patients will be blinded for the study treatment. The primary endpoint is the percentage of uncomplicated perineal wound healing, defined as a Southampton wound score of less than II on day 30. Secondary endpoints are hospital stay, incidence of perineal hernia, quality of life, and costs. DISCUSSION: The BIOPEX-study is the first randomized controlled multicentre study to determine the additive value of using a biological mesh for perineal wound closure after eAPR with neo-adjuvant radiotherapy compared to primary perineal wound closure with regard to perineal wound healing and the occurrence of perineal hernia. TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01927497 (Clinicaltrial.gov). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4158342 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41583422014-09-10 Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor with primary perineal wound closure after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer (BIOPEX-study) Musters, Gijsbert D Bemelman, Willem A Bosker, Robbert JI Burger, Jacobus WA van Duijvendijk, Peter van Etten, Boudewijn van Geloven, Anna AW de Graaf, Eelco JR Hoff, Christiaan de Korte, Niels Leijtens, Jeroen WA Rutten, Harm JT Singh, Baljit van de Ven, Anthony Vuylsteke, Ronald JCLM de wilt, Johannes HW Dijkgraaf, Marcel GW Tanis, Pieter J BMC Surg Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Primary perineal wound closure after conventional abdominoperineal resection (cAPR) for rectal cancer has been the standard of care for many years. Since the introduction of neo-adjuvant radiotherapy and the extralevator APR (eAPR), oncological outcome has been improved, but at the cost of increased rates of perineal wound healing problems and perineal hernia. This has progressively increased the use of biological meshes, although not supported by sufficient evidence. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of pelvic floor reconstruction using a biological mesh after standardized eAPR with neo-adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy compared to primary perineal wound closure. METHODS/DESIGN: In this multicentre randomized controlled trial, patients with a clinical diagnosis of primary rectal cancer who are scheduled for eAPR after neo-adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy will be considered eligible. Exclusion criteria are prior radiotherapy, sacral resection above S4/S5, allergy to pig products or polysorbate, collagen disorders, and severe systemic diseases affecting wound healing, except for diabetes. After informed consent, 104 patients will be randomized between standard care using primary wound closure of the perineum and the experimental arm consisting of suturing a biological mesh derived from porcine dermis in the pelvic floor defect, followed by perineal closure similar to the control arm. Patients will be followed for one year after the intervention and outcome assessors and patients will be blinded for the study treatment. The primary endpoint is the percentage of uncomplicated perineal wound healing, defined as a Southampton wound score of less than II on day 30. Secondary endpoints are hospital stay, incidence of perineal hernia, quality of life, and costs. DISCUSSION: The BIOPEX-study is the first randomized controlled multicentre study to determine the additive value of using a biological mesh for perineal wound closure after eAPR with neo-adjuvant radiotherapy compared to primary perineal wound closure with regard to perineal wound healing and the occurrence of perineal hernia. TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01927497 (Clinicaltrial.gov). BioMed Central 2014-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4158342/ /pubmed/25163547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-58 Text en Copyright © 2014 Musters et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Musters, Gijsbert D Bemelman, Willem A Bosker, Robbert JI Burger, Jacobus WA van Duijvendijk, Peter van Etten, Boudewijn van Geloven, Anna AW de Graaf, Eelco JR Hoff, Christiaan de Korte, Niels Leijtens, Jeroen WA Rutten, Harm JT Singh, Baljit van de Ven, Anthony Vuylsteke, Ronald JCLM de wilt, Johannes HW Dijkgraaf, Marcel GW Tanis, Pieter J Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor with primary perineal wound closure after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer (BIOPEX-study) |
title | Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor with primary perineal wound closure after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer (BIOPEX-study) |
title_full | Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor with primary perineal wound closure after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer (BIOPEX-study) |
title_fullStr | Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor with primary perineal wound closure after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer (BIOPEX-study) |
title_full_unstemmed | Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor with primary perineal wound closure after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer (BIOPEX-study) |
title_short | Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor with primary perineal wound closure after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer (BIOPEX-study) |
title_sort | randomized controlled multicentre study comparing biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor with primary perineal wound closure after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer (biopex-study) |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4158342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25163547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-58 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mustersgijsbertd randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy AT bemelmanwillema randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy AT boskerrobbertji randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy AT burgerjacobuswa randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy AT vanduijvendijkpeter randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy AT vanettenboudewijn randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy AT vangelovenannaaw randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy AT degraafeelcojr randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy AT hoffchristiaan randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy AT dekorteniels randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy AT leijtensjeroenwa randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy AT ruttenharmjt randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy AT singhbaljit randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy AT vandevenanthony randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy AT vuylstekeronaldjclm randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy AT dewiltjohanneshw randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy AT dijkgraafmarcelgw randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy AT tanispieterj randomizedcontrolledmulticentrestudycomparingbiologicalmeshclosureofthepelvicfloorwithprimaryperinealwoundclosureafterextralevatorabdominoperinealresectionforrectalcancerbiopexstudy |