Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of periosteum as a barrier membrane with and without an alloplastic bone graft in periodontal osseous defects: A 9 months follow-up study

BACKGROUND: Regenerative procedures frequently include the use of barrier membranes and bone grafting materials to encourage the growth of key surrounding tissues. The present study aims to evaluate and compare the ability of periosteum in intrabony defect regeneration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A tota...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Akhilesh, Lal, Nand, Singhal, Rameshwari, Rastogi, Pavitra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4158593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25210266
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.138706
_version_ 1782334086621167616
author Kumar, Akhilesh
Lal, Nand
Singhal, Rameshwari
Rastogi, Pavitra
author_facet Kumar, Akhilesh
Lal, Nand
Singhal, Rameshwari
Rastogi, Pavitra
author_sort Kumar, Akhilesh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Regenerative procedures frequently include the use of barrier membranes and bone grafting materials to encourage the growth of key surrounding tissues. The present study aims to evaluate and compare the ability of periosteum in intrabony defect regeneration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of ten intrabony defects were equally divided in two treatment groups. Group I consisted of Periosteum used as a barrier memebrane and Group II of periosteum as barrier membrane alongwith graft material. Nine months post operative evaluation of defect fill was done radiographically. RESULTS: Mean defect fill (CEJ-BBD) was found to be significantly lower in Group II as compared to Group I (P = 0.041). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, alloplastic graft material supplimentation results in better regeneration with Periosteum used as a barrier membrane.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4158593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41585932014-09-10 Comparative evaluation of periosteum as a barrier membrane with and without an alloplastic bone graft in periodontal osseous defects: A 9 months follow-up study Kumar, Akhilesh Lal, Nand Singhal, Rameshwari Rastogi, Pavitra J Indian Soc Periodontol Original Article BACKGROUND: Regenerative procedures frequently include the use of barrier membranes and bone grafting materials to encourage the growth of key surrounding tissues. The present study aims to evaluate and compare the ability of periosteum in intrabony defect regeneration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of ten intrabony defects were equally divided in two treatment groups. Group I consisted of Periosteum used as a barrier memebrane and Group II of periosteum as barrier membrane alongwith graft material. Nine months post operative evaluation of defect fill was done radiographically. RESULTS: Mean defect fill (CEJ-BBD) was found to be significantly lower in Group II as compared to Group I (P = 0.041). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, alloplastic graft material supplimentation results in better regeneration with Periosteum used as a barrier membrane. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4158593/ /pubmed/25210266 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.138706 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kumar, Akhilesh
Lal, Nand
Singhal, Rameshwari
Rastogi, Pavitra
Comparative evaluation of periosteum as a barrier membrane with and without an alloplastic bone graft in periodontal osseous defects: A 9 months follow-up study
title Comparative evaluation of periosteum as a barrier membrane with and without an alloplastic bone graft in periodontal osseous defects: A 9 months follow-up study
title_full Comparative evaluation of periosteum as a barrier membrane with and without an alloplastic bone graft in periodontal osseous defects: A 9 months follow-up study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of periosteum as a barrier membrane with and without an alloplastic bone graft in periodontal osseous defects: A 9 months follow-up study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of periosteum as a barrier membrane with and without an alloplastic bone graft in periodontal osseous defects: A 9 months follow-up study
title_short Comparative evaluation of periosteum as a barrier membrane with and without an alloplastic bone graft in periodontal osseous defects: A 9 months follow-up study
title_sort comparative evaluation of periosteum as a barrier membrane with and without an alloplastic bone graft in periodontal osseous defects: a 9 months follow-up study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4158593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25210266
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.138706
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarakhilesh comparativeevaluationofperiosteumasabarriermembranewithandwithoutanalloplasticbonegraftinperiodontalosseousdefectsa9monthsfollowupstudy
AT lalnand comparativeevaluationofperiosteumasabarriermembranewithandwithoutanalloplasticbonegraftinperiodontalosseousdefectsa9monthsfollowupstudy
AT singhalrameshwari comparativeevaluationofperiosteumasabarriermembranewithandwithoutanalloplasticbonegraftinperiodontalosseousdefectsa9monthsfollowupstudy
AT rastogipavitra comparativeevaluationofperiosteumasabarriermembranewithandwithoutanalloplasticbonegraftinperiodontalosseousdefectsa9monthsfollowupstudy