Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of periosteum as a barrier membrane with and without an alloplastic bone graft in periodontal osseous defects: A 9 months follow-up study
BACKGROUND: Regenerative procedures frequently include the use of barrier membranes and bone grafting materials to encourage the growth of key surrounding tissues. The present study aims to evaluate and compare the ability of periosteum in intrabony defect regeneration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A tota...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4158593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25210266 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.138706 |
_version_ | 1782334086621167616 |
---|---|
author | Kumar, Akhilesh Lal, Nand Singhal, Rameshwari Rastogi, Pavitra |
author_facet | Kumar, Akhilesh Lal, Nand Singhal, Rameshwari Rastogi, Pavitra |
author_sort | Kumar, Akhilesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Regenerative procedures frequently include the use of barrier membranes and bone grafting materials to encourage the growth of key surrounding tissues. The present study aims to evaluate and compare the ability of periosteum in intrabony defect regeneration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of ten intrabony defects were equally divided in two treatment groups. Group I consisted of Periosteum used as a barrier memebrane and Group II of periosteum as barrier membrane alongwith graft material. Nine months post operative evaluation of defect fill was done radiographically. RESULTS: Mean defect fill (CEJ-BBD) was found to be significantly lower in Group II as compared to Group I (P = 0.041). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, alloplastic graft material supplimentation results in better regeneration with Periosteum used as a barrier membrane. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4158593 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41585932014-09-10 Comparative evaluation of periosteum as a barrier membrane with and without an alloplastic bone graft in periodontal osseous defects: A 9 months follow-up study Kumar, Akhilesh Lal, Nand Singhal, Rameshwari Rastogi, Pavitra J Indian Soc Periodontol Original Article BACKGROUND: Regenerative procedures frequently include the use of barrier membranes and bone grafting materials to encourage the growth of key surrounding tissues. The present study aims to evaluate and compare the ability of periosteum in intrabony defect regeneration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of ten intrabony defects were equally divided in two treatment groups. Group I consisted of Periosteum used as a barrier memebrane and Group II of periosteum as barrier membrane alongwith graft material. Nine months post operative evaluation of defect fill was done radiographically. RESULTS: Mean defect fill (CEJ-BBD) was found to be significantly lower in Group II as compared to Group I (P = 0.041). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, alloplastic graft material supplimentation results in better regeneration with Periosteum used as a barrier membrane. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4158593/ /pubmed/25210266 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.138706 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kumar, Akhilesh Lal, Nand Singhal, Rameshwari Rastogi, Pavitra Comparative evaluation of periosteum as a barrier membrane with and without an alloplastic bone graft in periodontal osseous defects: A 9 months follow-up study |
title | Comparative evaluation of periosteum as a barrier membrane with and without an alloplastic bone graft in periodontal osseous defects: A 9 months follow-up study |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of periosteum as a barrier membrane with and without an alloplastic bone graft in periodontal osseous defects: A 9 months follow-up study |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of periosteum as a barrier membrane with and without an alloplastic bone graft in periodontal osseous defects: A 9 months follow-up study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of periosteum as a barrier membrane with and without an alloplastic bone graft in periodontal osseous defects: A 9 months follow-up study |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of periosteum as a barrier membrane with and without an alloplastic bone graft in periodontal osseous defects: A 9 months follow-up study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of periosteum as a barrier membrane with and without an alloplastic bone graft in periodontal osseous defects: a 9 months follow-up study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4158593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25210266 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.138706 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kumarakhilesh comparativeevaluationofperiosteumasabarriermembranewithandwithoutanalloplasticbonegraftinperiodontalosseousdefectsa9monthsfollowupstudy AT lalnand comparativeevaluationofperiosteumasabarriermembranewithandwithoutanalloplasticbonegraftinperiodontalosseousdefectsa9monthsfollowupstudy AT singhalrameshwari comparativeevaluationofperiosteumasabarriermembranewithandwithoutanalloplasticbonegraftinperiodontalosseousdefectsa9monthsfollowupstudy AT rastogipavitra comparativeevaluationofperiosteumasabarriermembranewithandwithoutanalloplasticbonegraftinperiodontalosseousdefectsa9monthsfollowupstudy |