Cargando…
Ovarian tissue cryopreservation followed by controlled ovarian stimulation and pick-up of mature oocytes does not impair the number or quality of retrieved oocytes
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of fertility preservation in cancer patients by combined bilateral ovarian cortex cryopreservation and embryo freezing. METHODS: This was a cohort-controlled study in a university hospital center. Sixteen patients with a recent...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4159502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25296615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-014-0080-8 |
_version_ | 1782334231433707520 |
---|---|
author | Dolmans, Marie-Madeleine Marotta, Maria-Laura Pirard, Céline Donnez, Jacques Donnez, Olivier |
author_facet | Dolmans, Marie-Madeleine Marotta, Maria-Laura Pirard, Céline Donnez, Jacques Donnez, Olivier |
author_sort | Dolmans, Marie-Madeleine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of fertility preservation in cancer patients by combined bilateral ovarian cortex cryopreservation and embryo freezing. METHODS: This was a cohort-controlled study in a university hospital center. Sixteen patients with a recent cancer diagnosis were included in the study. They all consented to fertility preservation by a combined technique: ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) followed by ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo freezing. The control group included 100 women of the same age undergoing IVF for male factor infertility. RESULTS: The mean number of metaphase II oocytes was 8.3 per patient (±7.7) and was not statistically different from the control group (8.1 ± 5.6). The mean number of good quality embryos obtained was not statistically different in the 2 groups (4.2 versus 4.4). CONCLUSION: OTC before embryo freezing does not impair the number or quality of cryopreserved embryos, but increases fertility preservation potential. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4159502 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41595022014-09-11 Ovarian tissue cryopreservation followed by controlled ovarian stimulation and pick-up of mature oocytes does not impair the number or quality of retrieved oocytes Dolmans, Marie-Madeleine Marotta, Maria-Laura Pirard, Céline Donnez, Jacques Donnez, Olivier J Ovarian Res Research BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of fertility preservation in cancer patients by combined bilateral ovarian cortex cryopreservation and embryo freezing. METHODS: This was a cohort-controlled study in a university hospital center. Sixteen patients with a recent cancer diagnosis were included in the study. They all consented to fertility preservation by a combined technique: ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) followed by ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo freezing. The control group included 100 women of the same age undergoing IVF for male factor infertility. RESULTS: The mean number of metaphase II oocytes was 8.3 per patient (±7.7) and was not statistically different from the control group (8.1 ± 5.6). The mean number of good quality embryos obtained was not statistically different in the 2 groups (4.2 versus 4.4). CONCLUSION: OTC before embryo freezing does not impair the number or quality of cryopreserved embryos, but increases fertility preservation potential. BioMed Central 2014-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4159502/ /pubmed/25296615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-014-0080-8 Text en © Dolmans et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Dolmans, Marie-Madeleine Marotta, Maria-Laura Pirard, Céline Donnez, Jacques Donnez, Olivier Ovarian tissue cryopreservation followed by controlled ovarian stimulation and pick-up of mature oocytes does not impair the number or quality of retrieved oocytes |
title | Ovarian tissue cryopreservation followed by controlled ovarian stimulation and pick-up of mature oocytes does not impair the number or quality of retrieved oocytes |
title_full | Ovarian tissue cryopreservation followed by controlled ovarian stimulation and pick-up of mature oocytes does not impair the number or quality of retrieved oocytes |
title_fullStr | Ovarian tissue cryopreservation followed by controlled ovarian stimulation and pick-up of mature oocytes does not impair the number or quality of retrieved oocytes |
title_full_unstemmed | Ovarian tissue cryopreservation followed by controlled ovarian stimulation and pick-up of mature oocytes does not impair the number or quality of retrieved oocytes |
title_short | Ovarian tissue cryopreservation followed by controlled ovarian stimulation and pick-up of mature oocytes does not impair the number or quality of retrieved oocytes |
title_sort | ovarian tissue cryopreservation followed by controlled ovarian stimulation and pick-up of mature oocytes does not impair the number or quality of retrieved oocytes |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4159502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25296615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-014-0080-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dolmansmariemadeleine ovariantissuecryopreservationfollowedbycontrolledovarianstimulationandpickupofmatureoocytesdoesnotimpairthenumberorqualityofretrievedoocytes AT marottamarialaura ovariantissuecryopreservationfollowedbycontrolledovarianstimulationandpickupofmatureoocytesdoesnotimpairthenumberorqualityofretrievedoocytes AT pirardceline ovariantissuecryopreservationfollowedbycontrolledovarianstimulationandpickupofmatureoocytesdoesnotimpairthenumberorqualityofretrievedoocytes AT donnezjacques ovariantissuecryopreservationfollowedbycontrolledovarianstimulationandpickupofmatureoocytesdoesnotimpairthenumberorqualityofretrievedoocytes AT donnezolivier ovariantissuecryopreservationfollowedbycontrolledovarianstimulationandpickupofmatureoocytesdoesnotimpairthenumberorqualityofretrievedoocytes |