Cargando…
How can you capture cultural dynamics?
Cross-cultural comparison is a critical method by which we can examine the interaction between culture and psychological processes. However, comparative methods tend to overlook cultural dynamics – the formation, maintenance, and transformation of cultures over time. The present article gives a brie...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4159988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25309476 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00995 |
_version_ | 1782334327634264064 |
---|---|
author | Kashima, Yoshihisa |
author_facet | Kashima, Yoshihisa |
author_sort | Kashima, Yoshihisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cross-cultural comparison is a critical method by which we can examine the interaction between culture and psychological processes. However, comparative methods tend to overlook cultural dynamics – the formation, maintenance, and transformation of cultures over time. The present article gives a brief overview of four different types of research designs that have been used to examine cultural dynamics in the literature: (1) cross-temporal methods that trace medium- to long-term changes in a culture; (2) cross-generational methods that explore medium-term implications of cultural transmission; (3) experimental simulation methods that investigate micro-level mechanisms of cultural dynamics; and (4) formal models and computer simulation methods often used to investigate long-term and macro-level implications of micro-level mechanisms. These methods differ in terms of level of analysis for which they are designed (micro vs. macro-level), scale of time for which they are typically used (short-, medium-, or long-term), and direction of inference (deductive vs. empirical method) that they imply. The paper describes examples of these methods, discuss their strengths and weaknesses, and point to their complementarity in inquiries about cultural change. Because cultural dynamics research is about meaning over time, issues deriving from interpretation of meaning and temporal distance between researchers and objects of inquiry can pose threats to the validity of the research and its findings. The methodological question about hermeneutic circle is recalled and further inquiries are encouraged. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4159988 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41599882014-10-10 How can you capture cultural dynamics? Kashima, Yoshihisa Front Psychol Psychology Cross-cultural comparison is a critical method by which we can examine the interaction between culture and psychological processes. However, comparative methods tend to overlook cultural dynamics – the formation, maintenance, and transformation of cultures over time. The present article gives a brief overview of four different types of research designs that have been used to examine cultural dynamics in the literature: (1) cross-temporal methods that trace medium- to long-term changes in a culture; (2) cross-generational methods that explore medium-term implications of cultural transmission; (3) experimental simulation methods that investigate micro-level mechanisms of cultural dynamics; and (4) formal models and computer simulation methods often used to investigate long-term and macro-level implications of micro-level mechanisms. These methods differ in terms of level of analysis for which they are designed (micro vs. macro-level), scale of time for which they are typically used (short-, medium-, or long-term), and direction of inference (deductive vs. empirical method) that they imply. The paper describes examples of these methods, discuss their strengths and weaknesses, and point to their complementarity in inquiries about cultural change. Because cultural dynamics research is about meaning over time, issues deriving from interpretation of meaning and temporal distance between researchers and objects of inquiry can pose threats to the validity of the research and its findings. The methodological question about hermeneutic circle is recalled and further inquiries are encouraged. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4159988/ /pubmed/25309476 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00995 Text en Copyright © 2014 Kashima. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Kashima, Yoshihisa How can you capture cultural dynamics? |
title | How can you capture cultural dynamics? |
title_full | How can you capture cultural dynamics? |
title_fullStr | How can you capture cultural dynamics? |
title_full_unstemmed | How can you capture cultural dynamics? |
title_short | How can you capture cultural dynamics? |
title_sort | how can you capture cultural dynamics? |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4159988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25309476 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00995 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kashimayoshihisa howcanyoucaptureculturaldynamics |