Cargando…

A 35-Year Trend Analysis for Back Pain in Austria: The Role of Obesity

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of back pain is constantly increasing and a public health problem of high priority. In Austria there is a lack of empirical evidence for the development of back pain and its related factors. The present study aims to investigate trends in the prevalence of back pain across...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Großschädl, Franziska, Freidl, Wolfgang, Rásky, Éva, Burkert, Nathalie, Muckenhuber, Johanna, Stronegger, Willibald J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4160246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25207972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107436
_version_ 1782334366070865920
author Großschädl, Franziska
Freidl, Wolfgang
Rásky, Éva
Burkert, Nathalie
Muckenhuber, Johanna
Stronegger, Willibald J.
author_facet Großschädl, Franziska
Freidl, Wolfgang
Rásky, Éva
Burkert, Nathalie
Muckenhuber, Johanna
Stronegger, Willibald J.
author_sort Großschädl, Franziska
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prevalence of back pain is constantly increasing and a public health problem of high priority. In Austria there is a lack of empirical evidence for the development of back pain and its related factors. The present study aims to investigate trends in the prevalence of back pain across different subpopulations (sex, age, obesity). METHODS: A secondary data analysis based on five nationally representative cross-sectional health surveys (1973–2007) was carried out. Face-to-face interviews were conducted in private homes in Austria. Subjects aged 20 years and older were included in the study sample (n = 178,818). Obesity was defined as BMI≥30 kg/m(2) and adjusted for self-report bias. Back pain was measured as the self-reported presence of the disorder. RESULTS: The age-standardized prevalence of back pain was 32.9% in 2007; it was higher among women than men (p<0.001), higher in older than younger subjects (p<0.001) and higher in obese than non-obese individuals (p<0.001). During the investigation period the absolute change in the prevalence of back pain was +19.4%. Among all subpopulations the prevalence steadily increased. Obese men showed the highest increase of and the greatest risk for back pain. CONCLUSION: These results help to understand the development of back pain in Austria and can be used to plan controlled promotion programs. Further monitoring is recommended in order to control risk groups and plan target group-specific prevention strategies. In Austria particular emphasis should be on obese individuals. We recommend conducting prospective studies to confirm our results and investigate causal relationships.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4160246
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41602462014-09-12 A 35-Year Trend Analysis for Back Pain in Austria: The Role of Obesity Großschädl, Franziska Freidl, Wolfgang Rásky, Éva Burkert, Nathalie Muckenhuber, Johanna Stronegger, Willibald J. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The prevalence of back pain is constantly increasing and a public health problem of high priority. In Austria there is a lack of empirical evidence for the development of back pain and its related factors. The present study aims to investigate trends in the prevalence of back pain across different subpopulations (sex, age, obesity). METHODS: A secondary data analysis based on five nationally representative cross-sectional health surveys (1973–2007) was carried out. Face-to-face interviews were conducted in private homes in Austria. Subjects aged 20 years and older were included in the study sample (n = 178,818). Obesity was defined as BMI≥30 kg/m(2) and adjusted for self-report bias. Back pain was measured as the self-reported presence of the disorder. RESULTS: The age-standardized prevalence of back pain was 32.9% in 2007; it was higher among women than men (p<0.001), higher in older than younger subjects (p<0.001) and higher in obese than non-obese individuals (p<0.001). During the investigation period the absolute change in the prevalence of back pain was +19.4%. Among all subpopulations the prevalence steadily increased. Obese men showed the highest increase of and the greatest risk for back pain. CONCLUSION: These results help to understand the development of back pain in Austria and can be used to plan controlled promotion programs. Further monitoring is recommended in order to control risk groups and plan target group-specific prevention strategies. In Austria particular emphasis should be on obese individuals. We recommend conducting prospective studies to confirm our results and investigate causal relationships. Public Library of Science 2014-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4160246/ /pubmed/25207972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107436 Text en © 2014 Großschädl et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Großschädl, Franziska
Freidl, Wolfgang
Rásky, Éva
Burkert, Nathalie
Muckenhuber, Johanna
Stronegger, Willibald J.
A 35-Year Trend Analysis for Back Pain in Austria: The Role of Obesity
title A 35-Year Trend Analysis for Back Pain in Austria: The Role of Obesity
title_full A 35-Year Trend Analysis for Back Pain in Austria: The Role of Obesity
title_fullStr A 35-Year Trend Analysis for Back Pain in Austria: The Role of Obesity
title_full_unstemmed A 35-Year Trend Analysis for Back Pain in Austria: The Role of Obesity
title_short A 35-Year Trend Analysis for Back Pain in Austria: The Role of Obesity
title_sort 35-year trend analysis for back pain in austria: the role of obesity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4160246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25207972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107436
work_keys_str_mv AT großschadlfranziska a35yeartrendanalysisforbackpaininaustriatheroleofobesity
AT freidlwolfgang a35yeartrendanalysisforbackpaininaustriatheroleofobesity
AT raskyeva a35yeartrendanalysisforbackpaininaustriatheroleofobesity
AT burkertnathalie a35yeartrendanalysisforbackpaininaustriatheroleofobesity
AT muckenhuberjohanna a35yeartrendanalysisforbackpaininaustriatheroleofobesity
AT stroneggerwillibaldj a35yeartrendanalysisforbackpaininaustriatheroleofobesity
AT großschadlfranziska 35yeartrendanalysisforbackpaininaustriatheroleofobesity
AT freidlwolfgang 35yeartrendanalysisforbackpaininaustriatheroleofobesity
AT raskyeva 35yeartrendanalysisforbackpaininaustriatheroleofobesity
AT burkertnathalie 35yeartrendanalysisforbackpaininaustriatheroleofobesity
AT muckenhuberjohanna 35yeartrendanalysisforbackpaininaustriatheroleofobesity
AT stroneggerwillibaldj 35yeartrendanalysisforbackpaininaustriatheroleofobesity