Cargando…

The association between proximity to animal-feeding operations and community health: a protocol for updating a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Livestock and poultry operations that feed large numbers of animals are common. Facility capacity varies, but it is not uncommon for facilities to house 1,000 swine with multiple barns at a single site, feedlots to house 50,000 cattle, and poultry houses to house 250,000 hens. There is p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Connor, Annette M, Auvermann, Brent W, Higgins, Julian PT, Kirychuk, Shelley P, Sargeant, Jan M, Von Essen, Susanna G, Glanville, Julie M, Wood, Hannah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4160559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25200608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-99
_version_ 1782334403441065984
author O’Connor, Annette M
Auvermann, Brent W
Higgins, Julian PT
Kirychuk, Shelley P
Sargeant, Jan M
Von Essen, Susanna G
Glanville, Julie M
Wood, Hannah
author_facet O’Connor, Annette M
Auvermann, Brent W
Higgins, Julian PT
Kirychuk, Shelley P
Sargeant, Jan M
Von Essen, Susanna G
Glanville, Julie M
Wood, Hannah
author_sort O’Connor, Annette M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Livestock and poultry operations that feed large numbers of animals are common. Facility capacity varies, but it is not uncommon for facilities to house 1,000 swine with multiple barns at a single site, feedlots to house 50,000 cattle, and poultry houses to house 250,000 hens. There is primary research that suggests livestock facilities that confine animals indoors for feeding can represent a health hazard for surrounding communities. In this protocol, we describe a review about the association between proximity to animal-feeding operations (AFOs) and the health of individuals in nearby communities. A systematic review of the topic was published by some members of our group in 2010. The purpose of this review is to update that review. METHODS/DESIGN: The populations of interest are people living in communities near livestock production facilities. Outcomes of interest are any health outcome measured in humans such as respiratory disease, gastrointestinal disease, and mental health. Measures of antibiotic resistance in people from the communities compared to measures of resistance found in animals and the environment on animal-feeding operations will also be summarized. The exposure of interest will be exposure to livestock production using a variety of metrics such as distance from facilities, endotoxin levels, and measures of odor. Electronic searches will be conducted using MEDLINE and MEDLINE In-Process (via OvidSP), CAB Abstracts (via Web of Knowledge), and Science Citation Index (via Web of Knowledge). No language or date restriction will be applied. We will access the risk of bias using a pilot version of a tool developed by the Methods Groups of the Cochrane Collaboration for non-randomized interventions. We propose to conduct a meta-analysis for each health metric (e.g., combining all respiratory disease outcomes, combining all gastrointestinal outcomes). A planned subgroup analysis will be based on the domains of the risk of bias. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will provide synthesis of current evidence reporting the association between living near an animal-feeding operation and human health. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42014010521
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4160559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41605592014-09-12 The association between proximity to animal-feeding operations and community health: a protocol for updating a systematic review O’Connor, Annette M Auvermann, Brent W Higgins, Julian PT Kirychuk, Shelley P Sargeant, Jan M Von Essen, Susanna G Glanville, Julie M Wood, Hannah Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Livestock and poultry operations that feed large numbers of animals are common. Facility capacity varies, but it is not uncommon for facilities to house 1,000 swine with multiple barns at a single site, feedlots to house 50,000 cattle, and poultry houses to house 250,000 hens. There is primary research that suggests livestock facilities that confine animals indoors for feeding can represent a health hazard for surrounding communities. In this protocol, we describe a review about the association between proximity to animal-feeding operations (AFOs) and the health of individuals in nearby communities. A systematic review of the topic was published by some members of our group in 2010. The purpose of this review is to update that review. METHODS/DESIGN: The populations of interest are people living in communities near livestock production facilities. Outcomes of interest are any health outcome measured in humans such as respiratory disease, gastrointestinal disease, and mental health. Measures of antibiotic resistance in people from the communities compared to measures of resistance found in animals and the environment on animal-feeding operations will also be summarized. The exposure of interest will be exposure to livestock production using a variety of metrics such as distance from facilities, endotoxin levels, and measures of odor. Electronic searches will be conducted using MEDLINE and MEDLINE In-Process (via OvidSP), CAB Abstracts (via Web of Knowledge), and Science Citation Index (via Web of Knowledge). No language or date restriction will be applied. We will access the risk of bias using a pilot version of a tool developed by the Methods Groups of the Cochrane Collaboration for non-randomized interventions. We propose to conduct a meta-analysis for each health metric (e.g., combining all respiratory disease outcomes, combining all gastrointestinal outcomes). A planned subgroup analysis will be based on the domains of the risk of bias. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will provide synthesis of current evidence reporting the association between living near an animal-feeding operation and human health. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42014010521 BioMed Central 2014-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4160559/ /pubmed/25200608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-99 Text en Copyright © 2014 O’Connor et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
O’Connor, Annette M
Auvermann, Brent W
Higgins, Julian PT
Kirychuk, Shelley P
Sargeant, Jan M
Von Essen, Susanna G
Glanville, Julie M
Wood, Hannah
The association between proximity to animal-feeding operations and community health: a protocol for updating a systematic review
title The association between proximity to animal-feeding operations and community health: a protocol for updating a systematic review
title_full The association between proximity to animal-feeding operations and community health: a protocol for updating a systematic review
title_fullStr The association between proximity to animal-feeding operations and community health: a protocol for updating a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The association between proximity to animal-feeding operations and community health: a protocol for updating a systematic review
title_short The association between proximity to animal-feeding operations and community health: a protocol for updating a systematic review
title_sort association between proximity to animal-feeding operations and community health: a protocol for updating a systematic review
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4160559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25200608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-99
work_keys_str_mv AT oconnorannettem theassociationbetweenproximitytoanimalfeedingoperationsandcommunityhealthaprotocolforupdatingasystematicreview
AT auvermannbrentw theassociationbetweenproximitytoanimalfeedingoperationsandcommunityhealthaprotocolforupdatingasystematicreview
AT higginsjulianpt theassociationbetweenproximitytoanimalfeedingoperationsandcommunityhealthaprotocolforupdatingasystematicreview
AT kirychukshelleyp theassociationbetweenproximitytoanimalfeedingoperationsandcommunityhealthaprotocolforupdatingasystematicreview
AT sargeantjanm theassociationbetweenproximitytoanimalfeedingoperationsandcommunityhealthaprotocolforupdatingasystematicreview
AT vonessensusannag theassociationbetweenproximitytoanimalfeedingoperationsandcommunityhealthaprotocolforupdatingasystematicreview
AT glanvillejuliem theassociationbetweenproximitytoanimalfeedingoperationsandcommunityhealthaprotocolforupdatingasystematicreview
AT woodhannah theassociationbetweenproximitytoanimalfeedingoperationsandcommunityhealthaprotocolforupdatingasystematicreview
AT oconnorannettem associationbetweenproximitytoanimalfeedingoperationsandcommunityhealthaprotocolforupdatingasystematicreview
AT auvermannbrentw associationbetweenproximitytoanimalfeedingoperationsandcommunityhealthaprotocolforupdatingasystematicreview
AT higginsjulianpt associationbetweenproximitytoanimalfeedingoperationsandcommunityhealthaprotocolforupdatingasystematicreview
AT kirychukshelleyp associationbetweenproximitytoanimalfeedingoperationsandcommunityhealthaprotocolforupdatingasystematicreview
AT sargeantjanm associationbetweenproximitytoanimalfeedingoperationsandcommunityhealthaprotocolforupdatingasystematicreview
AT vonessensusannag associationbetweenproximitytoanimalfeedingoperationsandcommunityhealthaprotocolforupdatingasystematicreview
AT glanvillejuliem associationbetweenproximitytoanimalfeedingoperationsandcommunityhealthaprotocolforupdatingasystematicreview
AT woodhannah associationbetweenproximitytoanimalfeedingoperationsandcommunityhealthaprotocolforupdatingasystematicreview