Cargando…

Impact of KIT exon 10 M541L allelic variant on the response to imatinib in aggressive fibromatosis: analysis of the desminib series by competitive allele specific Taqman PCR technology

BACKGROUND: Aggressive fibromatosis (AF) is a rare fibroblastic proliferative disease with a locally aggressive behavior and no distant metastasis, characterized by driver mutations in CTNNB1 or the APC gene. When progressive and/or symptomatic AF is not amenable to local management, a variety of me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dufresne, Armelle, Alberti, Laurent, Brahmi, Mehdi, Kabani, Sarah, Philippon, Héloïse, Pérol, David, Blay, Jean Yves
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4161827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25174682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-632
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Aggressive fibromatosis (AF) is a rare fibroblastic proliferative disease with a locally aggressive behavior and no distant metastasis, characterized by driver mutations in CTNNB1 or the APC gene. When progressive and/or symptomatic AF is not amenable to local management, a variety of medical treatments may be efficient, including imatinib mesylate. The phase II “Desminib trial” included 40 patients with AF to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of imatinib resulting in a 65% tumor control rate at 1 year. We investigated a potential predictive value of KIT exon 10 M541L variant (KIT(L541)) on this prospective series. METHODS: DNA was extracted in sufficient quantity from 33 patients included in the Desminib trial. The detection of KIT(L541) was performed by Competitive Allele-Specific Taqman® PCR technology. Chi-2 analyses were performed to search for a correlation between KIT status and tumor response. Progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared by log-rank test after Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: In 6 out of 33 cases (18%), the technique failed to determine the mutational status; 5 patients (19%) harboured KIT(L541) and 22 patients (81%) were classified as KIT wild type. Compared with total cohort, KIT(L541) frequency did not distinguish between different clinical characteristics. In the KIT(L541) and the KIT(WT) subgroups, the tumor control rate at 1 year was 100% and 68%, respectively (p = 0.316). The median PFS of patients harboring KIT(L541) or not is 29.9 and 24.5 months, respectively (p = 0.616), and the median OS is not reached, in any of the groups. CONCLUSION: Our results do not support a predictive effect of KIT(L541) on the efficacy of imatinib for patients with AF.