Cargando…

Insulin treatment guided by subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring compared to frequent point-of-care measurement in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Glucose measurement in intensive care medicine is performed intermittently with the risk of undetected hypoglycemia. The workload for the ICU nursing staff is substantial. Subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems are available and may be able to solve some of these issu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boom, Daphne T, Sechterberger, Marjolein K, Rijkenberg, Saskia, Kreder, Susanne, Bosman, Rob J, Wester, Jos PJ, van Stijn, Ilse, DeVries, J Hans, van der Voort, Peter HJ
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4161875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25139609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0453-9
_version_ 1782334612266024960
author Boom, Daphne T
Sechterberger, Marjolein K
Rijkenberg, Saskia
Kreder, Susanne
Bosman, Rob J
Wester, Jos PJ
van Stijn, Ilse
DeVries, J Hans
van der Voort, Peter HJ
author_facet Boom, Daphne T
Sechterberger, Marjolein K
Rijkenberg, Saskia
Kreder, Susanne
Bosman, Rob J
Wester, Jos PJ
van Stijn, Ilse
DeVries, J Hans
van der Voort, Peter HJ
author_sort Boom, Daphne T
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Glucose measurement in intensive care medicine is performed intermittently with the risk of undetected hypoglycemia. The workload for the ICU nursing staff is substantial. Subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems are available and may be able to solve some of these issues in critically ill patients. METHODS: In a randomized controlled design in a mixed ICU in a teaching hospital we compared the use of subcutaneous CGM with frequent point of care (POC) to guide insulin treatment. Adult critically ill patients with an expected stay of more than 24 hours and in need of insulin therapy were included. All patients received subcutaneous CGM. CGM data were blinded in the control group, whereas in the intervention group these data were used to feed a computerized glucose regulation algorithm. The same algorithm was used in the control group fed by intermittent POC glucose measurements. Safety was assessed with the incidence of severe hypoglycemia (<2.2 mmol/L), efficacy with the percentage time in target range (5.0 to 9.0 mmol/L). In addition, we assessed nursing workload and costs. RESULTS: In this study, 87 patients were randomized to the intervention and 90 to the control group. CGM device failure resulted in 78 and 78 patients for analysis. The incidence of severe glycemia and percentage of time within target range was similar in both groups. A significant reduction in daily nursing workload for glucose control was found in the intervention group (17 versus 36 minutes; P <0.001). Mean daily costs per patient were significantly reduced with EUR 12 (95% CI −32 to −18, P = 0.02) in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous CGM to guide insulin treatment in critically ill patients is as safe and effective as intermittent point-of-care measurements and reduces nursing workload and daily costs. A new algorithm designed for frequent measurements may lead to improved performance and should precede clinical implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01526044. Registered 1 February 2012. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-014-0453-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4161875
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41618752014-09-13 Insulin treatment guided by subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring compared to frequent point-of-care measurement in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial Boom, Daphne T Sechterberger, Marjolein K Rijkenberg, Saskia Kreder, Susanne Bosman, Rob J Wester, Jos PJ van Stijn, Ilse DeVries, J Hans van der Voort, Peter HJ Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Glucose measurement in intensive care medicine is performed intermittently with the risk of undetected hypoglycemia. The workload for the ICU nursing staff is substantial. Subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems are available and may be able to solve some of these issues in critically ill patients. METHODS: In a randomized controlled design in a mixed ICU in a teaching hospital we compared the use of subcutaneous CGM with frequent point of care (POC) to guide insulin treatment. Adult critically ill patients with an expected stay of more than 24 hours and in need of insulin therapy were included. All patients received subcutaneous CGM. CGM data were blinded in the control group, whereas in the intervention group these data were used to feed a computerized glucose regulation algorithm. The same algorithm was used in the control group fed by intermittent POC glucose measurements. Safety was assessed with the incidence of severe hypoglycemia (<2.2 mmol/L), efficacy with the percentage time in target range (5.0 to 9.0 mmol/L). In addition, we assessed nursing workload and costs. RESULTS: In this study, 87 patients were randomized to the intervention and 90 to the control group. CGM device failure resulted in 78 and 78 patients for analysis. The incidence of severe glycemia and percentage of time within target range was similar in both groups. A significant reduction in daily nursing workload for glucose control was found in the intervention group (17 versus 36 minutes; P <0.001). Mean daily costs per patient were significantly reduced with EUR 12 (95% CI −32 to −18, P = 0.02) in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous CGM to guide insulin treatment in critically ill patients is as safe and effective as intermittent point-of-care measurements and reduces nursing workload and daily costs. A new algorithm designed for frequent measurements may lead to improved performance and should precede clinical implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01526044. Registered 1 February 2012. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-014-0453-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-08-20 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4161875/ /pubmed/25139609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0453-9 Text en © Boom et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Boom, Daphne T
Sechterberger, Marjolein K
Rijkenberg, Saskia
Kreder, Susanne
Bosman, Rob J
Wester, Jos PJ
van Stijn, Ilse
DeVries, J Hans
van der Voort, Peter HJ
Insulin treatment guided by subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring compared to frequent point-of-care measurement in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial
title Insulin treatment guided by subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring compared to frequent point-of-care measurement in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Insulin treatment guided by subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring compared to frequent point-of-care measurement in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Insulin treatment guided by subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring compared to frequent point-of-care measurement in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Insulin treatment guided by subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring compared to frequent point-of-care measurement in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Insulin treatment guided by subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring compared to frequent point-of-care measurement in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort insulin treatment guided by subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring compared to frequent point-of-care measurement in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4161875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25139609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0453-9
work_keys_str_mv AT boomdaphnet insulintreatmentguidedbysubcutaneouscontinuousglucosemonitoringcomparedtofrequentpointofcaremeasurementincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sechterbergermarjoleink insulintreatmentguidedbysubcutaneouscontinuousglucosemonitoringcomparedtofrequentpointofcaremeasurementincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rijkenbergsaskia insulintreatmentguidedbysubcutaneouscontinuousglucosemonitoringcomparedtofrequentpointofcaremeasurementincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kredersusanne insulintreatmentguidedbysubcutaneouscontinuousglucosemonitoringcomparedtofrequentpointofcaremeasurementincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bosmanrobj insulintreatmentguidedbysubcutaneouscontinuousglucosemonitoringcomparedtofrequentpointofcaremeasurementincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT westerjospj insulintreatmentguidedbysubcutaneouscontinuousglucosemonitoringcomparedtofrequentpointofcaremeasurementincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanstijnilse insulintreatmentguidedbysubcutaneouscontinuousglucosemonitoringcomparedtofrequentpointofcaremeasurementincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT devriesjhans insulintreatmentguidedbysubcutaneouscontinuousglucosemonitoringcomparedtofrequentpointofcaremeasurementincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vandervoortpeterhj insulintreatmentguidedbysubcutaneouscontinuousglucosemonitoringcomparedtofrequentpointofcaremeasurementincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial