Cargando…

Effect of glenohumeral forward flexion on upper limb myoelectric activity during simulated mills manipulation; relations to peripheral nerve biomechanics

BACKGROUND: It is generally accepted that muscles may activate via the common nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) in response to painful stimuli associated with tensile or compressive forces on peripheral nerves. Following the basic assumption that the radial nerve may be stressed around the elbow duri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rade, Marinko, Shacklock, Michael, Rissanen, Saara M, Peharec, Stanislav, Bačić, Petar, Candian, Corrado, Kankaanpää, Markku, Airaksinen, Olavi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4161896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25178538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-288
_version_ 1782334617241518080
author Rade, Marinko
Shacklock, Michael
Rissanen, Saara M
Peharec, Stanislav
Bačić, Petar
Candian, Corrado
Kankaanpää, Markku
Airaksinen, Olavi
author_facet Rade, Marinko
Shacklock, Michael
Rissanen, Saara M
Peharec, Stanislav
Bačić, Petar
Candian, Corrado
Kankaanpää, Markku
Airaksinen, Olavi
author_sort Rade, Marinko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is generally accepted that muscles may activate via the common nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) in response to painful stimuli associated with tensile or compressive forces on peripheral nerves. Following the basic assumption that the radial nerve may be stressed around the elbow during the execution of the Mills manipulation, t wo positions considered to have different mechanical effects on the radial nerve and the brachial plexus were tested in order to i) explore whether muscles are activated in certain patterns with concomitant changes in nerve tension, ii) establish whether muscle responses can be modified with mechanical unloading of the brachial plexus. METHODS: Muscle responses were quantified bilaterally in eight subjects (N = 16) during Mills Manipulation (MM) pre-manipulative positioning and a Varied position that putatively produces less mechanical tension in the brachial plexus. End range pre-manipulative stretch was used in order to simulate the effects of Mills manipulation. Electromyographic signals were recorded with a 16 channel portable EMG unit and correlated with kinematic data from three charge-coupled device adjustable cameras which allowed for precise movement tracking. RESULTS: Compared with the Standard Mills manipulation position, the Varied position produced significantly reduced myoelectric activity (P ≤ .001) in all test muscles. Additional subjective data support the notion that certain muscle activity patterns were protective. CONCLUSION: It seems that protective muscles are selectively activated in a specific pattern in order to protect the radial nerve from mechanical tension by shortening its pathway, suggesting integration of muscle and neural mechanisms. Furthermore, the significantly decreased myoelectric activity with reduced mechanical tension in the brachial plexus may help controlling collateral effects of the Mills manipulation itself, making it potentially safer and more specific. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-288) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4161896
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41618962014-09-13 Effect of glenohumeral forward flexion on upper limb myoelectric activity during simulated mills manipulation; relations to peripheral nerve biomechanics Rade, Marinko Shacklock, Michael Rissanen, Saara M Peharec, Stanislav Bačić, Petar Candian, Corrado Kankaanpää, Markku Airaksinen, Olavi BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: It is generally accepted that muscles may activate via the common nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) in response to painful stimuli associated with tensile or compressive forces on peripheral nerves. Following the basic assumption that the radial nerve may be stressed around the elbow during the execution of the Mills manipulation, t wo positions considered to have different mechanical effects on the radial nerve and the brachial plexus were tested in order to i) explore whether muscles are activated in certain patterns with concomitant changes in nerve tension, ii) establish whether muscle responses can be modified with mechanical unloading of the brachial plexus. METHODS: Muscle responses were quantified bilaterally in eight subjects (N = 16) during Mills Manipulation (MM) pre-manipulative positioning and a Varied position that putatively produces less mechanical tension in the brachial plexus. End range pre-manipulative stretch was used in order to simulate the effects of Mills manipulation. Electromyographic signals were recorded with a 16 channel portable EMG unit and correlated with kinematic data from three charge-coupled device adjustable cameras which allowed for precise movement tracking. RESULTS: Compared with the Standard Mills manipulation position, the Varied position produced significantly reduced myoelectric activity (P ≤ .001) in all test muscles. Additional subjective data support the notion that certain muscle activity patterns were protective. CONCLUSION: It seems that protective muscles are selectively activated in a specific pattern in order to protect the radial nerve from mechanical tension by shortening its pathway, suggesting integration of muscle and neural mechanisms. Furthermore, the significantly decreased myoelectric activity with reduced mechanical tension in the brachial plexus may help controlling collateral effects of the Mills manipulation itself, making it potentially safer and more specific. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-288) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4161896/ /pubmed/25178538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-288 Text en © Rade et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rade, Marinko
Shacklock, Michael
Rissanen, Saara M
Peharec, Stanislav
Bačić, Petar
Candian, Corrado
Kankaanpää, Markku
Airaksinen, Olavi
Effect of glenohumeral forward flexion on upper limb myoelectric activity during simulated mills manipulation; relations to peripheral nerve biomechanics
title Effect of glenohumeral forward flexion on upper limb myoelectric activity during simulated mills manipulation; relations to peripheral nerve biomechanics
title_full Effect of glenohumeral forward flexion on upper limb myoelectric activity during simulated mills manipulation; relations to peripheral nerve biomechanics
title_fullStr Effect of glenohumeral forward flexion on upper limb myoelectric activity during simulated mills manipulation; relations to peripheral nerve biomechanics
title_full_unstemmed Effect of glenohumeral forward flexion on upper limb myoelectric activity during simulated mills manipulation; relations to peripheral nerve biomechanics
title_short Effect of glenohumeral forward flexion on upper limb myoelectric activity during simulated mills manipulation; relations to peripheral nerve biomechanics
title_sort effect of glenohumeral forward flexion on upper limb myoelectric activity during simulated mills manipulation; relations to peripheral nerve biomechanics
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4161896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25178538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-288
work_keys_str_mv AT rademarinko effectofglenohumeralforwardflexiononupperlimbmyoelectricactivityduringsimulatedmillsmanipulationrelationstoperipheralnervebiomechanics
AT shacklockmichael effectofglenohumeralforwardflexiononupperlimbmyoelectricactivityduringsimulatedmillsmanipulationrelationstoperipheralnervebiomechanics
AT rissanensaaram effectofglenohumeralforwardflexiononupperlimbmyoelectricactivityduringsimulatedmillsmanipulationrelationstoperipheralnervebiomechanics
AT peharecstanislav effectofglenohumeralforwardflexiononupperlimbmyoelectricactivityduringsimulatedmillsmanipulationrelationstoperipheralnervebiomechanics
AT bacicpetar effectofglenohumeralforwardflexiononupperlimbmyoelectricactivityduringsimulatedmillsmanipulationrelationstoperipheralnervebiomechanics
AT candiancorrado effectofglenohumeralforwardflexiononupperlimbmyoelectricactivityduringsimulatedmillsmanipulationrelationstoperipheralnervebiomechanics
AT kankaanpaamarkku effectofglenohumeralforwardflexiononupperlimbmyoelectricactivityduringsimulatedmillsmanipulationrelationstoperipheralnervebiomechanics
AT airaksinenolavi effectofglenohumeralforwardflexiononupperlimbmyoelectricactivityduringsimulatedmillsmanipulationrelationstoperipheralnervebiomechanics