Cargando…
Communicating the Benefits and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Needed for an Informed Choice: A Systematic Evaluation of Leaflets and Booklets
OBJECTIVE: Evidence-based health information (EBHI) can support informed choice regarding whether or not to attend colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The present study aimed to assess if German leaflets and booklets appropriately inform consumers on the benefits and harms of CRC screening. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4162645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25215867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107575 |
_version_ | 1782334701542834176 |
---|---|
author | Dreier, Maren Borutta, Birgit Seidel, Gabriele Münch, Inga Kramer, Silke Töppich, Jürgen Dierks, Marie-Luise Walter, Ulla |
author_facet | Dreier, Maren Borutta, Birgit Seidel, Gabriele Münch, Inga Kramer, Silke Töppich, Jürgen Dierks, Marie-Luise Walter, Ulla |
author_sort | Dreier, Maren |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Evidence-based health information (EBHI) can support informed choice regarding whether or not to attend colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The present study aimed to assess if German leaflets and booklets appropriately inform consumers on the benefits and harms of CRC screening. METHODS: A systematic search for print media on CRC screening was performed via email enquiry and internet search. The identified documents were assessed for the presence and correctness of information on benefits and harms by two reviewers independently using a comprehensive list of criteria. RESULTS: Many of the 28 leaflets and 13 booklets identified presented unbalanced information on the benefits and harms of CRC screening: one-third did not provide any information on harms. Numeracy information was often lacking. Ten cross-language examples of common misinterpretations or basically false and misleading information were identified. DISCUSSION: Most of the CRC screening leaflets and booklets in Germany do not meet current EBHI standards. After the study, the publishers of the information materials were provided feedback, including a discussion of our findings. The results can be used to revise existing information materials or to develop new materials that provide correct, balanced, quantified, understandable and unbiased information on CRC screening. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4162645 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41626452014-09-17 Communicating the Benefits and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Needed for an Informed Choice: A Systematic Evaluation of Leaflets and Booklets Dreier, Maren Borutta, Birgit Seidel, Gabriele Münch, Inga Kramer, Silke Töppich, Jürgen Dierks, Marie-Luise Walter, Ulla PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Evidence-based health information (EBHI) can support informed choice regarding whether or not to attend colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The present study aimed to assess if German leaflets and booklets appropriately inform consumers on the benefits and harms of CRC screening. METHODS: A systematic search for print media on CRC screening was performed via email enquiry and internet search. The identified documents were assessed for the presence and correctness of information on benefits and harms by two reviewers independently using a comprehensive list of criteria. RESULTS: Many of the 28 leaflets and 13 booklets identified presented unbalanced information on the benefits and harms of CRC screening: one-third did not provide any information on harms. Numeracy information was often lacking. Ten cross-language examples of common misinterpretations or basically false and misleading information were identified. DISCUSSION: Most of the CRC screening leaflets and booklets in Germany do not meet current EBHI standards. After the study, the publishers of the information materials were provided feedback, including a discussion of our findings. The results can be used to revise existing information materials or to develop new materials that provide correct, balanced, quantified, understandable and unbiased information on CRC screening. Public Library of Science 2014-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4162645/ /pubmed/25215867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107575 Text en © 2014 Dreier et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dreier, Maren Borutta, Birgit Seidel, Gabriele Münch, Inga Kramer, Silke Töppich, Jürgen Dierks, Marie-Luise Walter, Ulla Communicating the Benefits and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Needed for an Informed Choice: A Systematic Evaluation of Leaflets and Booklets |
title | Communicating the Benefits and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Needed for an Informed Choice: A Systematic Evaluation of Leaflets and Booklets |
title_full | Communicating the Benefits and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Needed for an Informed Choice: A Systematic Evaluation of Leaflets and Booklets |
title_fullStr | Communicating the Benefits and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Needed for an Informed Choice: A Systematic Evaluation of Leaflets and Booklets |
title_full_unstemmed | Communicating the Benefits and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Needed for an Informed Choice: A Systematic Evaluation of Leaflets and Booklets |
title_short | Communicating the Benefits and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Needed for an Informed Choice: A Systematic Evaluation of Leaflets and Booklets |
title_sort | communicating the benefits and harms of colorectal cancer screening needed for an informed choice: a systematic evaluation of leaflets and booklets |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4162645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25215867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107575 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dreiermaren communicatingthebenefitsandharmsofcolorectalcancerscreeningneededforaninformedchoiceasystematicevaluationofleafletsandbooklets AT boruttabirgit communicatingthebenefitsandharmsofcolorectalcancerscreeningneededforaninformedchoiceasystematicevaluationofleafletsandbooklets AT seidelgabriele communicatingthebenefitsandharmsofcolorectalcancerscreeningneededforaninformedchoiceasystematicevaluationofleafletsandbooklets AT munchinga communicatingthebenefitsandharmsofcolorectalcancerscreeningneededforaninformedchoiceasystematicevaluationofleafletsandbooklets AT kramersilke communicatingthebenefitsandharmsofcolorectalcancerscreeningneededforaninformedchoiceasystematicevaluationofleafletsandbooklets AT toppichjurgen communicatingthebenefitsandharmsofcolorectalcancerscreeningneededforaninformedchoiceasystematicevaluationofleafletsandbooklets AT dierksmarieluise communicatingthebenefitsandharmsofcolorectalcancerscreeningneededforaninformedchoiceasystematicevaluationofleafletsandbooklets AT walterulla communicatingthebenefitsandharmsofcolorectalcancerscreeningneededforaninformedchoiceasystematicevaluationofleafletsandbooklets |