Cargando…

Postural stabilization during bilateral and unilateral vibration of ankle muscles in the sagittal and frontal planes

BACKGROUND: The purpose was to investigate the postural consequences of proprioceptive perturbation of the Triceps Surae and Peroneus Longus muscles. These muscles are known to control posture respectively in the sagittal and frontal planes during standing. METHODS: Standard parameters and the time...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duclos, Noémie C, Maynard, Luc, Barthelemy, Joëlle, Mesure, Serge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4162932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25178183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-130
_version_ 1782334726790447104
author Duclos, Noémie C
Maynard, Luc
Barthelemy, Joëlle
Mesure, Serge
author_facet Duclos, Noémie C
Maynard, Luc
Barthelemy, Joëlle
Mesure, Serge
author_sort Duclos, Noémie C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose was to investigate the postural consequences of proprioceptive perturbation of the Triceps Surae and Peroneus Longus muscles. These muscles are known to control posture respectively in the sagittal and frontal planes during standing. METHODS: Standard parameters and the time course of center of pressure (CoP) displacements were recorded in 21 young adults, instructed to maintain their balance during tendon vibration. Following 4 s of baseline recording, three types of vibration (80 Hz) were applied for 20 s each on the Peroneus or Achilles tendons, either unilaterally or bilaterally (with eyes shut). The recording continued for a further 24 s after the end of the vibration during the re-stabilization phase. To evaluate the time course of the CoP displacement, each phase of the trial was divided into periods of 4 seconds. Differences between the type of tendon vibration, phases and periods were analyzed using ANOVA. RESULTS: During all tendon vibrations, the speed of the CoP increased and a posterior displacement occurred. These changes were greater during Achilles than during Peroneus vibration for each type of vibration and also during bilateral compared with unilateral vibration. All maximal posterior positions occurred at a similar instant (between 12.7 and 14 s of vibration). Only unilateral Achilles vibration led to a significant medio-lateral displacement compared to the initial state. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of the proprioceptive perturbation seems to be influenced by the position of the vibrated muscle according to the planes of the musculoskeletal postural organization. The amplitude of the destabilization may be related to the importance of the muscle for postural control. The medial CoP displacement which occurred during unilateral Achilles vibration is not a general reaction to a single-limb perturbation. Proprioceptive input from the non-perturbed leg was not sufficient for the antero-posterior displacement to be avoided; however, it helped to gain stability over time. The non-perturbed limb clearly plays an important role in the restoration of the postural referential, both during and immediately following the end of the vibration. The results demonstrated that at least 16 s of vibration are necessary to induce most postural effects in young adults. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1743-0003-11-130) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4162932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41629322014-09-14 Postural stabilization during bilateral and unilateral vibration of ankle muscles in the sagittal and frontal planes Duclos, Noémie C Maynard, Luc Barthelemy, Joëlle Mesure, Serge J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: The purpose was to investigate the postural consequences of proprioceptive perturbation of the Triceps Surae and Peroneus Longus muscles. These muscles are known to control posture respectively in the sagittal and frontal planes during standing. METHODS: Standard parameters and the time course of center of pressure (CoP) displacements were recorded in 21 young adults, instructed to maintain their balance during tendon vibration. Following 4 s of baseline recording, three types of vibration (80 Hz) were applied for 20 s each on the Peroneus or Achilles tendons, either unilaterally or bilaterally (with eyes shut). The recording continued for a further 24 s after the end of the vibration during the re-stabilization phase. To evaluate the time course of the CoP displacement, each phase of the trial was divided into periods of 4 seconds. Differences between the type of tendon vibration, phases and periods were analyzed using ANOVA. RESULTS: During all tendon vibrations, the speed of the CoP increased and a posterior displacement occurred. These changes were greater during Achilles than during Peroneus vibration for each type of vibration and also during bilateral compared with unilateral vibration. All maximal posterior positions occurred at a similar instant (between 12.7 and 14 s of vibration). Only unilateral Achilles vibration led to a significant medio-lateral displacement compared to the initial state. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of the proprioceptive perturbation seems to be influenced by the position of the vibrated muscle according to the planes of the musculoskeletal postural organization. The amplitude of the destabilization may be related to the importance of the muscle for postural control. The medial CoP displacement which occurred during unilateral Achilles vibration is not a general reaction to a single-limb perturbation. Proprioceptive input from the non-perturbed leg was not sufficient for the antero-posterior displacement to be avoided; however, it helped to gain stability over time. The non-perturbed limb clearly plays an important role in the restoration of the postural referential, both during and immediately following the end of the vibration. The results demonstrated that at least 16 s of vibration are necessary to induce most postural effects in young adults. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1743-0003-11-130) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4162932/ /pubmed/25178183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-130 Text en © Duclos et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Duclos, Noémie C
Maynard, Luc
Barthelemy, Joëlle
Mesure, Serge
Postural stabilization during bilateral and unilateral vibration of ankle muscles in the sagittal and frontal planes
title Postural stabilization during bilateral and unilateral vibration of ankle muscles in the sagittal and frontal planes
title_full Postural stabilization during bilateral and unilateral vibration of ankle muscles in the sagittal and frontal planes
title_fullStr Postural stabilization during bilateral and unilateral vibration of ankle muscles in the sagittal and frontal planes
title_full_unstemmed Postural stabilization during bilateral and unilateral vibration of ankle muscles in the sagittal and frontal planes
title_short Postural stabilization during bilateral and unilateral vibration of ankle muscles in the sagittal and frontal planes
title_sort postural stabilization during bilateral and unilateral vibration of ankle muscles in the sagittal and frontal planes
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4162932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25178183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-130
work_keys_str_mv AT duclosnoemiec posturalstabilizationduringbilateralandunilateralvibrationofanklemusclesinthesagittalandfrontalplanes
AT maynardluc posturalstabilizationduringbilateralandunilateralvibrationofanklemusclesinthesagittalandfrontalplanes
AT barthelemyjoelle posturalstabilizationduringbilateralandunilateralvibrationofanklemusclesinthesagittalandfrontalplanes
AT mesureserge posturalstabilizationduringbilateralandunilateralvibrationofanklemusclesinthesagittalandfrontalplanes