Cargando…
Patient, surgeon, and healthcare purchaser views on the use of decision and communication aids in orthopaedic surgery: a mixed methods study
BACKGROUND: Despite evidence that decision and communication aids are effective for enhancing the quality of preference-sensitive decisions, their adoption in the field of orthopaedic surgery has been limited. The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to evaluate the perceived value of decision an...
Autores principales: | Bozic, Kevin J, Chenok, Kate Eresian, Schindel, Jennifer, Chan, Vanessa, Huddleston, James I, Braddock, Clarence, Belkora, Jeffrey |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4162971/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25176023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-366 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Quality Measurement in Orthopaedics: The Purchasers’ View
por: Lansky, David, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Collecting Patient-Reported Outcomes: Lessons from the California Joint Replacement Registry
por: Chenok, Kate, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Disclosing conflicts of interest in patient decision aids
por: Barry, Michael J, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Barriers and facilitators to orthopaedic surgeons’ uptake of decision aids for total knee arthroplasty: a qualitative study
por: Bunzli, Samantha, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Coaching patients in the use of decision and communication aids: RE-AIM evaluation of a patient support program
por: Belkora, Jeff, et al.
Publicado: (2015)