Cargando…

Spinal bone metastases in gynecologic malignancies: a retrospective analysis of stability, prognostic factors and survival

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the stability of spinal metastases in gynecologic cancer patients (pts) on the basis of a validated scoring system after radiotherapy (RT), to define prognostic factors for stability and to calculate survival. METHODS: Fourty-four women...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foerster, Robert, Habermehl, Daniel, Bruckner, Thomas, Bostel, Tilman, Schlampp, Ingmar, Welzel, Thomas, Debus, Juergen, Rief, Harald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4163163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25182126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-194
_version_ 1782334751199199232
author Foerster, Robert
Habermehl, Daniel
Bruckner, Thomas
Bostel, Tilman
Schlampp, Ingmar
Welzel, Thomas
Debus, Juergen
Rief, Harald
author_facet Foerster, Robert
Habermehl, Daniel
Bruckner, Thomas
Bostel, Tilman
Schlampp, Ingmar
Welzel, Thomas
Debus, Juergen
Rief, Harald
author_sort Foerster, Robert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the stability of spinal metastases in gynecologic cancer patients (pts) on the basis of a validated scoring system after radiotherapy (RT), to define prognostic factors for stability and to calculate survival. METHODS: Fourty-four women with gynecologic malignancies and spinal bone metastases were treated at our department between January 2000 and January 2012. Out of those 34 were assessed regarding stability using the Taneichi score before, 3 and 6 months after RT. Additionally prognostic factors for stability, overall survival, and bone survival (time between first day of RT of bone metastases and death from any cause) were calculated. RESULTS: Before RT 47% of pts were unstable and 6 months after RT 85% of pts were stable. Karnofsky performance status (KPS) >70% (p = 0.037) and no chemotherapy (ChT) (p = 0.046) prior to RT were significantly predictive for response. 5-year overall survival was 69% and 1-year bone survival was 73%. CONCLUSIONS: RT is capable of improving stability of osteolytic spinal metastases from gynecologic cancer by facilitating re-ossification in survivors. KPS may be a predictor for response. Pts who received ChT prior to RT may require additional bone supportive treatment to overcome bone remodeling imbalance. Survival in women with bone metastases from gynecologic cancer remains poor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4163163
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41631632014-09-15 Spinal bone metastases in gynecologic malignancies: a retrospective analysis of stability, prognostic factors and survival Foerster, Robert Habermehl, Daniel Bruckner, Thomas Bostel, Tilman Schlampp, Ingmar Welzel, Thomas Debus, Juergen Rief, Harald Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the stability of spinal metastases in gynecologic cancer patients (pts) on the basis of a validated scoring system after radiotherapy (RT), to define prognostic factors for stability and to calculate survival. METHODS: Fourty-four women with gynecologic malignancies and spinal bone metastases were treated at our department between January 2000 and January 2012. Out of those 34 were assessed regarding stability using the Taneichi score before, 3 and 6 months after RT. Additionally prognostic factors for stability, overall survival, and bone survival (time between first day of RT of bone metastases and death from any cause) were calculated. RESULTS: Before RT 47% of pts were unstable and 6 months after RT 85% of pts were stable. Karnofsky performance status (KPS) >70% (p = 0.037) and no chemotherapy (ChT) (p = 0.046) prior to RT were significantly predictive for response. 5-year overall survival was 69% and 1-year bone survival was 73%. CONCLUSIONS: RT is capable of improving stability of osteolytic spinal metastases from gynecologic cancer by facilitating re-ossification in survivors. KPS may be a predictor for response. Pts who received ChT prior to RT may require additional bone supportive treatment to overcome bone remodeling imbalance. Survival in women with bone metastases from gynecologic cancer remains poor. BioMed Central 2014-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4163163/ /pubmed/25182126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-194 Text en © Foerster et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Foerster, Robert
Habermehl, Daniel
Bruckner, Thomas
Bostel, Tilman
Schlampp, Ingmar
Welzel, Thomas
Debus, Juergen
Rief, Harald
Spinal bone metastases in gynecologic malignancies: a retrospective analysis of stability, prognostic factors and survival
title Spinal bone metastases in gynecologic malignancies: a retrospective analysis of stability, prognostic factors and survival
title_full Spinal bone metastases in gynecologic malignancies: a retrospective analysis of stability, prognostic factors and survival
title_fullStr Spinal bone metastases in gynecologic malignancies: a retrospective analysis of stability, prognostic factors and survival
title_full_unstemmed Spinal bone metastases in gynecologic malignancies: a retrospective analysis of stability, prognostic factors and survival
title_short Spinal bone metastases in gynecologic malignancies: a retrospective analysis of stability, prognostic factors and survival
title_sort spinal bone metastases in gynecologic malignancies: a retrospective analysis of stability, prognostic factors and survival
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4163163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25182126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-194
work_keys_str_mv AT foersterrobert spinalbonemetastasesingynecologicmalignanciesaretrospectiveanalysisofstabilityprognosticfactorsandsurvival
AT habermehldaniel spinalbonemetastasesingynecologicmalignanciesaretrospectiveanalysisofstabilityprognosticfactorsandsurvival
AT brucknerthomas spinalbonemetastasesingynecologicmalignanciesaretrospectiveanalysisofstabilityprognosticfactorsandsurvival
AT bosteltilman spinalbonemetastasesingynecologicmalignanciesaretrospectiveanalysisofstabilityprognosticfactorsandsurvival
AT schlamppingmar spinalbonemetastasesingynecologicmalignanciesaretrospectiveanalysisofstabilityprognosticfactorsandsurvival
AT welzelthomas spinalbonemetastasesingynecologicmalignanciesaretrospectiveanalysisofstabilityprognosticfactorsandsurvival
AT debusjuergen spinalbonemetastasesingynecologicmalignanciesaretrospectiveanalysisofstabilityprognosticfactorsandsurvival
AT riefharald spinalbonemetastasesingynecologicmalignanciesaretrospectiveanalysisofstabilityprognosticfactorsandsurvival