Cargando…

The role of multiplex PCR test in identification of bacterial pathogens in lower respiratory tract infections

Objectives: Lower respiratory tract infection is one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality. However establishing a microbial diagnosis for patients with lower respiratory tract infection is still challenging and is often achieved in only half of cases by conventional methods. This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aydemir, Ozlem, Aydemir, Yusuf, Ozdemir, Mehmet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Professional Medical Publicaitons 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4163223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25225517
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.305.5098
_version_ 1782334763512627200
author Aydemir, Ozlem
Aydemir, Yusuf
Ozdemir, Mehmet
author_facet Aydemir, Ozlem
Aydemir, Yusuf
Ozdemir, Mehmet
author_sort Aydemir, Ozlem
collection PubMed
description Objectives: Lower respiratory tract infection is one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality. However establishing a microbial diagnosis for patients with lower respiratory tract infection is still challenging and is often achieved in only half of cases by conventional methods. This study was designed to compare the fast responsive PCR method with the culture method in lower respiratory tract infections and to evaluate the reliability of multiplex PCR method. Methods: One hundred ninety seven patients with the symptoms of acute lower respiratory tract infection, and diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia, acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and exacerbations of bronchiectasis were included in the study. Both culture and PCR methods was performed for the isolation of most commonly seen bacteria, from sputum, nasopharyngeal swabs and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples. Results: While at least one bacterial isolation was determined in 62 (31.5%) of all patients with culture method, this number increased to 125 (63.5%) with multiplex PCR. The bacteria most commonly identified by PCR were S. pneumoniae (32%) and H. influenzae (31%). There was a significant difference between PCR and culture in terms of multi-factor detection rates (p<0.005). Multiple bacteria were detected in only two cases in cultures; however, multiple pathogens were detected in 47 cases with PCR. Conclusions: Conventional methods, such as culture and serology are not always adequate to detect the pathogens in lower respiratory tract. Real-time PCR assays proved highly sensitive and rapid. The prevalence of bacteria and multiple agent detected by real-time PCR compared with culture was substantially higher. Widespread use of PCR methods, by providing the immediate and appropriate ''agent specific antibiotic treatment'' of LRTI, will help reduce failure and contributes to a reduction in antibiotic resistance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4163223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Professional Medical Publicaitons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41632232014-09-15 The role of multiplex PCR test in identification of bacterial pathogens in lower respiratory tract infections Aydemir, Ozlem Aydemir, Yusuf Ozdemir, Mehmet Pak J Med Sci Original Article Objectives: Lower respiratory tract infection is one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality. However establishing a microbial diagnosis for patients with lower respiratory tract infection is still challenging and is often achieved in only half of cases by conventional methods. This study was designed to compare the fast responsive PCR method with the culture method in lower respiratory tract infections and to evaluate the reliability of multiplex PCR method. Methods: One hundred ninety seven patients with the symptoms of acute lower respiratory tract infection, and diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia, acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and exacerbations of bronchiectasis were included in the study. Both culture and PCR methods was performed for the isolation of most commonly seen bacteria, from sputum, nasopharyngeal swabs and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples. Results: While at least one bacterial isolation was determined in 62 (31.5%) of all patients with culture method, this number increased to 125 (63.5%) with multiplex PCR. The bacteria most commonly identified by PCR were S. pneumoniae (32%) and H. influenzae (31%). There was a significant difference between PCR and culture in terms of multi-factor detection rates (p<0.005). Multiple bacteria were detected in only two cases in cultures; however, multiple pathogens were detected in 47 cases with PCR. Conclusions: Conventional methods, such as culture and serology are not always adequate to detect the pathogens in lower respiratory tract. Real-time PCR assays proved highly sensitive and rapid. The prevalence of bacteria and multiple agent detected by real-time PCR compared with culture was substantially higher. Widespread use of PCR methods, by providing the immediate and appropriate ''agent specific antibiotic treatment'' of LRTI, will help reduce failure and contributes to a reduction in antibiotic resistance. Professional Medical Publicaitons 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4163223/ /pubmed/25225517 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.305.5098 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Aydemir, Ozlem
Aydemir, Yusuf
Ozdemir, Mehmet
The role of multiplex PCR test in identification of bacterial pathogens in lower respiratory tract infections
title The role of multiplex PCR test in identification of bacterial pathogens in lower respiratory tract infections
title_full The role of multiplex PCR test in identification of bacterial pathogens in lower respiratory tract infections
title_fullStr The role of multiplex PCR test in identification of bacterial pathogens in lower respiratory tract infections
title_full_unstemmed The role of multiplex PCR test in identification of bacterial pathogens in lower respiratory tract infections
title_short The role of multiplex PCR test in identification of bacterial pathogens in lower respiratory tract infections
title_sort role of multiplex pcr test in identification of bacterial pathogens in lower respiratory tract infections
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4163223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25225517
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.305.5098
work_keys_str_mv AT aydemirozlem theroleofmultiplexpcrtestinidentificationofbacterialpathogensinlowerrespiratorytractinfections
AT aydemiryusuf theroleofmultiplexpcrtestinidentificationofbacterialpathogensinlowerrespiratorytractinfections
AT ozdemirmehmet theroleofmultiplexpcrtestinidentificationofbacterialpathogensinlowerrespiratorytractinfections
AT aydemirozlem roleofmultiplexpcrtestinidentificationofbacterialpathogensinlowerrespiratorytractinfections
AT aydemiryusuf roleofmultiplexpcrtestinidentificationofbacterialpathogensinlowerrespiratorytractinfections
AT ozdemirmehmet roleofmultiplexpcrtestinidentificationofbacterialpathogensinlowerrespiratorytractinfections