Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of chromogenic agar medium and conventional culture system for isolation and presumptive identification of uropathogens

Objective: Urine is the most frequent specimen received for culture/sensitivity by clinical laboratories. The microbiological performance of HiCrome UTI agar medium was compared with Blood agar and MacConkey agar for isolation and presumptive identification of bacteria from urine culture. Methods: A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akter, Laila, Haque, Rezwana, Salam, Md. Abdus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Professional Medical Publicaitons 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4163227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25225521
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.305.5243
_version_ 1782334764519260160
author Akter, Laila
Haque, Rezwana
Salam, Md. Abdus
author_facet Akter, Laila
Haque, Rezwana
Salam, Md. Abdus
author_sort Akter, Laila
collection PubMed
description Objective: Urine is the most frequent specimen received for culture/sensitivity by clinical laboratories. The microbiological performance of HiCrome UTI agar medium was compared with Blood agar and MacConkey agar for isolation and presumptive identification of bacteria from urine culture. Methods: A total of 443 consecutively collected midstream and/or catheter-catch urine samples from patients attending the Islami Bank Medical College Hospital, Rajshahi, Bangladesh during January to December, 2012 were cultured. Urine samples showing pus cells ≥ 5/HPF were inoculated on to Blood agar (BA), MacConkey agar (MAC) and HiCrome UTI agar (CA) media simultaneously and incubated overnight aerobically at 37(0)C. Rate of isolation and presumptive identification of bacterial species were compared for different media. Results: Culture yielded a total of 199 bacterial isolates from 189 (42.67%) positive plates including 179 (40.40%) unimicrobial and 10 (2.26%) polymicrobial (mixed growth of pair of bacteria) growths. Both HiCrome UTI agar and Blood agar media supported 100% growths while 151 (75.88%) growths were observed on MacConkey agar. The rate of presumptive identification was found significantly higher on HiCrome UTI agar (97.49%) than MAC agar (67.34%) (P<0.001) as primary urine culture medium. Of 199 isolates, E. coli was found to be the leading uropathogen isolated from 118 (59.30%) samples with its presumptive identification rate of 95.76%, 93.22% and 5.93% on CA, MAC and BA respectively. All 10 (100%) polymicrobial growths were demonstrated distinctly on CA against only 01(10%) on each BA and MAC. Conclusion: HiCrome UTI agar was found to be more useful as primary urine culture medium in both higher rate of isolation and presumptive identification of uropathogens in comparison to conventional media. Its inherent characteristics in demonstrating polymicrobial growth and ease of rapid identification by distinct colony colour are unique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4163227
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Professional Medical Publicaitons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41632272014-09-15 Comparative evaluation of chromogenic agar medium and conventional culture system for isolation and presumptive identification of uropathogens Akter, Laila Haque, Rezwana Salam, Md. Abdus Pak J Med Sci Original Article Objective: Urine is the most frequent specimen received for culture/sensitivity by clinical laboratories. The microbiological performance of HiCrome UTI agar medium was compared with Blood agar and MacConkey agar for isolation and presumptive identification of bacteria from urine culture. Methods: A total of 443 consecutively collected midstream and/or catheter-catch urine samples from patients attending the Islami Bank Medical College Hospital, Rajshahi, Bangladesh during January to December, 2012 were cultured. Urine samples showing pus cells ≥ 5/HPF were inoculated on to Blood agar (BA), MacConkey agar (MAC) and HiCrome UTI agar (CA) media simultaneously and incubated overnight aerobically at 37(0)C. Rate of isolation and presumptive identification of bacterial species were compared for different media. Results: Culture yielded a total of 199 bacterial isolates from 189 (42.67%) positive plates including 179 (40.40%) unimicrobial and 10 (2.26%) polymicrobial (mixed growth of pair of bacteria) growths. Both HiCrome UTI agar and Blood agar media supported 100% growths while 151 (75.88%) growths were observed on MacConkey agar. The rate of presumptive identification was found significantly higher on HiCrome UTI agar (97.49%) than MAC agar (67.34%) (P<0.001) as primary urine culture medium. Of 199 isolates, E. coli was found to be the leading uropathogen isolated from 118 (59.30%) samples with its presumptive identification rate of 95.76%, 93.22% and 5.93% on CA, MAC and BA respectively. All 10 (100%) polymicrobial growths were demonstrated distinctly on CA against only 01(10%) on each BA and MAC. Conclusion: HiCrome UTI agar was found to be more useful as primary urine culture medium in both higher rate of isolation and presumptive identification of uropathogens in comparison to conventional media. Its inherent characteristics in demonstrating polymicrobial growth and ease of rapid identification by distinct colony colour are unique. Professional Medical Publicaitons 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4163227/ /pubmed/25225521 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.305.5243 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Akter, Laila
Haque, Rezwana
Salam, Md. Abdus
Comparative evaluation of chromogenic agar medium and conventional culture system for isolation and presumptive identification of uropathogens
title Comparative evaluation of chromogenic agar medium and conventional culture system for isolation and presumptive identification of uropathogens
title_full Comparative evaluation of chromogenic agar medium and conventional culture system for isolation and presumptive identification of uropathogens
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of chromogenic agar medium and conventional culture system for isolation and presumptive identification of uropathogens
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of chromogenic agar medium and conventional culture system for isolation and presumptive identification of uropathogens
title_short Comparative evaluation of chromogenic agar medium and conventional culture system for isolation and presumptive identification of uropathogens
title_sort comparative evaluation of chromogenic agar medium and conventional culture system for isolation and presumptive identification of uropathogens
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4163227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25225521
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.305.5243
work_keys_str_mv AT akterlaila comparativeevaluationofchromogenicagarmediumandconventionalculturesystemforisolationandpresumptiveidentificationofuropathogens
AT haquerezwana comparativeevaluationofchromogenicagarmediumandconventionalculturesystemforisolationandpresumptiveidentificationofuropathogens
AT salammdabdus comparativeevaluationofchromogenicagarmediumandconventionalculturesystemforisolationandpresumptiveidentificationofuropathogens