Cargando…

Developing Objective Metrics for Unit Staffing (DOMUS) study

OBJECTIVE: Safe midwifery staffing levels on delivery suites is a priority area for any maternity service. Escalation policies are tools that provide an operational response to emergency pressures. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of using a scoring system to contemporaneously ass...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siddiqui, I, Whittingham, B, Meadowcroft, K, Richardson, M, Cooper, J C, Belcher, J, Morris, E, Ismail, K M K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4163650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25217367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005398
_version_ 1782334853793972224
author Siddiqui, I
Whittingham, B
Meadowcroft, K
Richardson, M
Cooper, J C
Belcher, J
Morris, E
Ismail, K M K
author_facet Siddiqui, I
Whittingham, B
Meadowcroft, K
Richardson, M
Cooper, J C
Belcher, J
Morris, E
Ismail, K M K
author_sort Siddiqui, I
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Safe midwifery staffing levels on delivery suites is a priority area for any maternity service. Escalation policies are tools that provide an operational response to emergency pressures. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of using a scoring system to contemporaneously assess the required staffing level based on demand and use this to determine delivery suite escalation level and utilise the information generated regarding clinical activity (Demand) and staffing levels (Capacity) to generate unit-specific calculation for the actual number of midwifery staff required. SETTING: A maternity unit of a university-affiliated tertiary referral hospital. DESIGN: Over a 12-month period, specifically designed scoring sheets were completed by delivery suite shift co-ordinators four times a day (04:00, 10:00, 16:00 and 22:00). Based on the dependency score (Demand) and the number of midwifery staff available (Capacity), an escalation level was determined for each shift. The 80th centile of the demand was used to determine optimal capacity. RESULTS: A total of 1160 scoring sheets were completed. Average staff number throughout the year on any shift was 7 (range 3–11). Average dependency score was 7 (range 1–14). The 80th centile for demand was calculated to be 11. CONCLUSIONS: This study stresses the importance and usefulness of a simple tool that can be used to determine the level of escalation on delivery suite based on an objective scoring system and can also be used to determine the appropriate staffing on delivery suite.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4163650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41636502014-09-16 Developing Objective Metrics for Unit Staffing (DOMUS) study Siddiqui, I Whittingham, B Meadowcroft, K Richardson, M Cooper, J C Belcher, J Morris, E Ismail, K M K BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: Safe midwifery staffing levels on delivery suites is a priority area for any maternity service. Escalation policies are tools that provide an operational response to emergency pressures. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of using a scoring system to contemporaneously assess the required staffing level based on demand and use this to determine delivery suite escalation level and utilise the information generated regarding clinical activity (Demand) and staffing levels (Capacity) to generate unit-specific calculation for the actual number of midwifery staff required. SETTING: A maternity unit of a university-affiliated tertiary referral hospital. DESIGN: Over a 12-month period, specifically designed scoring sheets were completed by delivery suite shift co-ordinators four times a day (04:00, 10:00, 16:00 and 22:00). Based on the dependency score (Demand) and the number of midwifery staff available (Capacity), an escalation level was determined for each shift. The 80th centile of the demand was used to determine optimal capacity. RESULTS: A total of 1160 scoring sheets were completed. Average staff number throughout the year on any shift was 7 (range 3–11). Average dependency score was 7 (range 1–14). The 80th centile for demand was calculated to be 11. CONCLUSIONS: This study stresses the importance and usefulness of a simple tool that can be used to determine the level of escalation on delivery suite based on an objective scoring system and can also be used to determine the appropriate staffing on delivery suite. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4163650/ /pubmed/25217367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005398 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Siddiqui, I
Whittingham, B
Meadowcroft, K
Richardson, M
Cooper, J C
Belcher, J
Morris, E
Ismail, K M K
Developing Objective Metrics for Unit Staffing (DOMUS) study
title Developing Objective Metrics for Unit Staffing (DOMUS) study
title_full Developing Objective Metrics for Unit Staffing (DOMUS) study
title_fullStr Developing Objective Metrics for Unit Staffing (DOMUS) study
title_full_unstemmed Developing Objective Metrics for Unit Staffing (DOMUS) study
title_short Developing Objective Metrics for Unit Staffing (DOMUS) study
title_sort developing objective metrics for unit staffing (domus) study
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4163650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25217367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005398
work_keys_str_mv AT siddiquii developingobjectivemetricsforunitstaffingdomusstudy
AT whittinghamb developingobjectivemetricsforunitstaffingdomusstudy
AT meadowcroftk developingobjectivemetricsforunitstaffingdomusstudy
AT richardsonm developingobjectivemetricsforunitstaffingdomusstudy
AT cooperjc developingobjectivemetricsforunitstaffingdomusstudy
AT belcherj developingobjectivemetricsforunitstaffingdomusstudy
AT morrise developingobjectivemetricsforunitstaffingdomusstudy
AT ismailkmk developingobjectivemetricsforunitstaffingdomusstudy