Cargando…

Effects of low-intensity laser therapy on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: A clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Low-intensity laser therapy (LILT) can be utilized for different treatments in the field of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of LILT on (1) the rate of canine movement during canine retraction phase and (2) evaluate the r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kansal, Ankur, Kittur, Nandan, Kumbhojkar, Vinayak, Keluskar, Kanhoba Mahabaleshwar, Dahiya, Parveen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4163827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25225562
_version_ 1782334869700870144
author Kansal, Ankur
Kittur, Nandan
Kumbhojkar, Vinayak
Keluskar, Kanhoba Mahabaleshwar
Dahiya, Parveen
author_facet Kansal, Ankur
Kittur, Nandan
Kumbhojkar, Vinayak
Keluskar, Kanhoba Mahabaleshwar
Dahiya, Parveen
author_sort Kansal, Ankur
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Low-intensity laser therapy (LILT) can be utilized for different treatments in the field of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of LILT on (1) the rate of canine movement during canine retraction phase and (2) evaluate the radiographic changes occurring during LILT around the irradiated area. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 10 patients of both genders were included for this study. One quadrant of the upper arch was considered control group (CG) and received mechanical activation of the canine teeth with 150 g. The opposite quadrant received the same mechanical activation and was also irradiated with a diode emitting light (gallium-arsenide laser) at 904 nm, for 10 s at 12 mW, at 4.2 J/cm(2). Laser application was done on 1(st) day, 3(rd), 7(th), 14(th), 21(th), 28(th), 35(th), 42(nd), 49(th), 56(th) day respectively during the canine retraction phase. Distance was measured on 1(st) day, 35(th) day and 63(rd) day and appliance activation was done on 1(st) and 35(th) day. Results were analyzed using t-test with the significance level set at P < 0.01. RESULTS: Mean value obtained from 1(st) to 63(rd) day was 3.30 ± 2.36 mm for CG and 3.53 ± 2.30 mm for laser group (LG). CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of tooth movement during canine retraction between the LG and the CG. There was no evidence of any pathologic changes in the radiograph following LILT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4163827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41638272014-09-15 Effects of low-intensity laser therapy on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: A clinical trial Kansal, Ankur Kittur, Nandan Kumbhojkar, Vinayak Keluskar, Kanhoba Mahabaleshwar Dahiya, Parveen Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: Low-intensity laser therapy (LILT) can be utilized for different treatments in the field of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of LILT on (1) the rate of canine movement during canine retraction phase and (2) evaluate the radiographic changes occurring during LILT around the irradiated area. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 10 patients of both genders were included for this study. One quadrant of the upper arch was considered control group (CG) and received mechanical activation of the canine teeth with 150 g. The opposite quadrant received the same mechanical activation and was also irradiated with a diode emitting light (gallium-arsenide laser) at 904 nm, for 10 s at 12 mW, at 4.2 J/cm(2). Laser application was done on 1(st) day, 3(rd), 7(th), 14(th), 21(th), 28(th), 35(th), 42(nd), 49(th), 56(th) day respectively during the canine retraction phase. Distance was measured on 1(st) day, 35(th) day and 63(rd) day and appliance activation was done on 1(st) and 35(th) day. Results were analyzed using t-test with the significance level set at P < 0.01. RESULTS: Mean value obtained from 1(st) to 63(rd) day was 3.30 ± 2.36 mm for CG and 3.53 ± 2.30 mm for laser group (LG). CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of tooth movement during canine retraction between the LG and the CG. There was no evidence of any pathologic changes in the radiograph following LILT. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4163827/ /pubmed/25225562 Text en Copyright: © Dental Research Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kansal, Ankur
Kittur, Nandan
Kumbhojkar, Vinayak
Keluskar, Kanhoba Mahabaleshwar
Dahiya, Parveen
Effects of low-intensity laser therapy on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: A clinical trial
title Effects of low-intensity laser therapy on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: A clinical trial
title_full Effects of low-intensity laser therapy on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: A clinical trial
title_fullStr Effects of low-intensity laser therapy on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: A clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of low-intensity laser therapy on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: A clinical trial
title_short Effects of low-intensity laser therapy on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: A clinical trial
title_sort effects of low-intensity laser therapy on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: a clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4163827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25225562
work_keys_str_mv AT kansalankur effectsoflowintensitylasertherapyontherateoforthodontictoothmovementaclinicaltrial
AT kitturnandan effectsoflowintensitylasertherapyontherateoforthodontictoothmovementaclinicaltrial
AT kumbhojkarvinayak effectsoflowintensitylasertherapyontherateoforthodontictoothmovementaclinicaltrial
AT keluskarkanhobamahabaleshwar effectsoflowintensitylasertherapyontherateoforthodontictoothmovementaclinicaltrial
AT dahiyaparveen effectsoflowintensitylasertherapyontherateoforthodontictoothmovementaclinicaltrial