Cargando…
Is extended-field concurrent chemoradiation an option for radiologic negative paraaortic lymph node, locally advanced cervical cancer?
BACKGROUND: The aim was to evaluate whether extended-field concurrent chemoradiation (EF-CCRT) leads to results better than those obtained by standard whole-pelvis concurrent chemoradiation (WP-CCRT) in locally advanced cervical cancer with radiologic negative paraaortic lymph nodes (PALNs). PATIENT...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4164041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25228820 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S68262 |
_version_ | 1782334905998376960 |
---|---|
author | Asiri, Mushabbab Al Tunio, Mutahir A Mohamed, Reham Bayoumi, Yasser Alhadab, Abdulrehman Saleh, Rasha M AlArifi, Muhannad Saud Alobaid, Abdelaziz |
author_facet | Asiri, Mushabbab Al Tunio, Mutahir A Mohamed, Reham Bayoumi, Yasser Alhadab, Abdulrehman Saleh, Rasha M AlArifi, Muhannad Saud Alobaid, Abdelaziz |
author_sort | Asiri, Mushabbab Al |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim was to evaluate whether extended-field concurrent chemoradiation (EF-CCRT) leads to results better than those obtained by standard whole-pelvis concurrent chemoradiation (WP-CCRT) in locally advanced cervical cancer with radiologic negative paraaortic lymph nodes (PALNs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 102 patients with histopathologically proven squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous cell carcinoma, and radiologic negative PALN locally advanced cervical cancer, stage IIB-IVA, were accrued between July 2007 and April 2008 and were randomly assigned to WP-CCRT (50 patients) or EF-CCRT (52 patients), followed by high-dose rate brachytherapy. Data regarding the safety profile, response rates, and occurrence of local, PALN, or distant failure were recorded. RESULTS: During a median follow-up time of 60 months (18–66), 74/102 patients completed the treatment protocol and were analyzed. Overall PALN, distant-metastasis control, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 97.1%, 86.9%, 80.3%, and 72.4% in EF-CCRT respectively in comparison with WP-CCRT (82.1%,74.7%, 69.1%, and 60.4%), with P-values of 0.02, 0.03, 0.03 and 0.04 respectively. No difference in acute toxicity profile was seen between the groups, and late toxicities were mild and minimal. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic EF-CCRT can be a reasonable option in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer with radiologic positive pelvic lymph nodes and radiologic negative PALN. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4164041 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41640412014-09-16 Is extended-field concurrent chemoradiation an option for radiologic negative paraaortic lymph node, locally advanced cervical cancer? Asiri, Mushabbab Al Tunio, Mutahir A Mohamed, Reham Bayoumi, Yasser Alhadab, Abdulrehman Saleh, Rasha M AlArifi, Muhannad Saud Alobaid, Abdelaziz Cancer Manag Res Original Research BACKGROUND: The aim was to evaluate whether extended-field concurrent chemoradiation (EF-CCRT) leads to results better than those obtained by standard whole-pelvis concurrent chemoradiation (WP-CCRT) in locally advanced cervical cancer with radiologic negative paraaortic lymph nodes (PALNs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 102 patients with histopathologically proven squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous cell carcinoma, and radiologic negative PALN locally advanced cervical cancer, stage IIB-IVA, were accrued between July 2007 and April 2008 and were randomly assigned to WP-CCRT (50 patients) or EF-CCRT (52 patients), followed by high-dose rate brachytherapy. Data regarding the safety profile, response rates, and occurrence of local, PALN, or distant failure were recorded. RESULTS: During a median follow-up time of 60 months (18–66), 74/102 patients completed the treatment protocol and were analyzed. Overall PALN, distant-metastasis control, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 97.1%, 86.9%, 80.3%, and 72.4% in EF-CCRT respectively in comparison with WP-CCRT (82.1%,74.7%, 69.1%, and 60.4%), with P-values of 0.02, 0.03, 0.03 and 0.04 respectively. No difference in acute toxicity profile was seen between the groups, and late toxicities were mild and minimal. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic EF-CCRT can be a reasonable option in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer with radiologic positive pelvic lymph nodes and radiologic negative PALN. Dove Medical Press 2014-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4164041/ /pubmed/25228820 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S68262 Text en © 2014 Asiri et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Asiri, Mushabbab Al Tunio, Mutahir A Mohamed, Reham Bayoumi, Yasser Alhadab, Abdulrehman Saleh, Rasha M AlArifi, Muhannad Saud Alobaid, Abdelaziz Is extended-field concurrent chemoradiation an option for radiologic negative paraaortic lymph node, locally advanced cervical cancer? |
title | Is extended-field concurrent chemoradiation an option for radiologic negative paraaortic lymph node, locally advanced cervical cancer? |
title_full | Is extended-field concurrent chemoradiation an option for radiologic negative paraaortic lymph node, locally advanced cervical cancer? |
title_fullStr | Is extended-field concurrent chemoradiation an option for radiologic negative paraaortic lymph node, locally advanced cervical cancer? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is extended-field concurrent chemoradiation an option for radiologic negative paraaortic lymph node, locally advanced cervical cancer? |
title_short | Is extended-field concurrent chemoradiation an option for radiologic negative paraaortic lymph node, locally advanced cervical cancer? |
title_sort | is extended-field concurrent chemoradiation an option for radiologic negative paraaortic lymph node, locally advanced cervical cancer? |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4164041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25228820 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S68262 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT asirimushabbabal isextendedfieldconcurrentchemoradiationanoptionforradiologicnegativeparaaorticlymphnodelocallyadvancedcervicalcancer AT tuniomutahira isextendedfieldconcurrentchemoradiationanoptionforradiologicnegativeparaaorticlymphnodelocallyadvancedcervicalcancer AT mohamedreham isextendedfieldconcurrentchemoradiationanoptionforradiologicnegativeparaaorticlymphnodelocallyadvancedcervicalcancer AT bayoumiyasser isextendedfieldconcurrentchemoradiationanoptionforradiologicnegativeparaaorticlymphnodelocallyadvancedcervicalcancer AT alhadababdulrehman isextendedfieldconcurrentchemoradiationanoptionforradiologicnegativeparaaorticlymphnodelocallyadvancedcervicalcancer AT salehrasham isextendedfieldconcurrentchemoradiationanoptionforradiologicnegativeparaaorticlymphnodelocallyadvancedcervicalcancer AT alarifimuhannadsaud isextendedfieldconcurrentchemoradiationanoptionforradiologicnegativeparaaorticlymphnodelocallyadvancedcervicalcancer AT alobaidabdelaziz isextendedfieldconcurrentchemoradiationanoptionforradiologicnegativeparaaorticlymphnodelocallyadvancedcervicalcancer |