Cargando…

Decision-making strategies: ignored to the detriment of healthcare training and delivery?

Context: People do not always make health-related decisions which reflect their best interest – best interest being defined as the decision they would make if they carefully considered the options and fully understood the information available. A substantial literature has developed in behavioral ec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Desmond, Chris, Brubaker, Kathryn A., Ellner, Andrew L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Routledge 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4164239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25264501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2013.854706
_version_ 1782334926256865280
author Desmond, Chris
Brubaker, Kathryn A.
Ellner, Andrew L.
author_facet Desmond, Chris
Brubaker, Kathryn A.
Ellner, Andrew L.
author_sort Desmond, Chris
collection PubMed
description Context: People do not always make health-related decisions which reflect their best interest – best interest being defined as the decision they would make if they carefully considered the options and fully understood the information available. A substantial literature has developed in behavioral economics and social psychology that seeks to elucidate the patterns in individual decision-making. While this is particularly relevant to healthcare, the insights from these fields have only been applied in a limited way. To address the health challenges of the twenty-first century, healthcare providers and healthcare systems designers need to more fully understand how individuals are making decisions. Methods: We provide an overview of the theories of behavioral economics and social psychology that relate to how individuals make health-related decisions. The concentration on health-related decisions leads to a focus on three topics: (1) mental shortcuts and motivated reasoning; (2) implications of time; and (3) implications of affect. The first topic is relevant because health-related decisions are often made in a hurry without a full appreciation of the implications and the deliberation they warrant. The second topic is included because the link between a decision and its health-related outcomes can involve a significant time lag. The final topic is included because health and affect are so often linked. Findings: The literature reviewed has implications for healthcare training and delivery. Selection for medical training must consider the skills necessary to understand and adapt to how patients make decisions. Training on the insights garnered from behavioral economics and social psychology would better prepare healthcare providers to effectively support their clients to lead healthy lives. Healthcare delivery should be structured to respond to the way in which decisions are made. Conclusions: These patterns in decision-making call into question basic assumptions our healthcare system makes about the best way to treat patients and deliver care. This literature has implications for the way we train physicians and deliver care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4164239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Routledge
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41642392014-09-24 Decision-making strategies: ignored to the detriment of healthcare training and delivery? Desmond, Chris Brubaker, Kathryn A. Ellner, Andrew L. Health Psychol Behav Med Review Context: People do not always make health-related decisions which reflect their best interest – best interest being defined as the decision they would make if they carefully considered the options and fully understood the information available. A substantial literature has developed in behavioral economics and social psychology that seeks to elucidate the patterns in individual decision-making. While this is particularly relevant to healthcare, the insights from these fields have only been applied in a limited way. To address the health challenges of the twenty-first century, healthcare providers and healthcare systems designers need to more fully understand how individuals are making decisions. Methods: We provide an overview of the theories of behavioral economics and social psychology that relate to how individuals make health-related decisions. The concentration on health-related decisions leads to a focus on three topics: (1) mental shortcuts and motivated reasoning; (2) implications of time; and (3) implications of affect. The first topic is relevant because health-related decisions are often made in a hurry without a full appreciation of the implications and the deliberation they warrant. The second topic is included because the link between a decision and its health-related outcomes can involve a significant time lag. The final topic is included because health and affect are so often linked. Findings: The literature reviewed has implications for healthcare training and delivery. Selection for medical training must consider the skills necessary to understand and adapt to how patients make decisions. Training on the insights garnered from behavioral economics and social psychology would better prepare healthcare providers to effectively support their clients to lead healthy lives. Healthcare delivery should be structured to respond to the way in which decisions are made. Conclusions: These patterns in decision-making call into question basic assumptions our healthcare system makes about the best way to treat patients and deliver care. This literature has implications for the way we train physicians and deliver care. Routledge 2013-01-01 2013-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4164239/ /pubmed/25264501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2013.854706 Text en © 2013 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.
spellingShingle Review
Desmond, Chris
Brubaker, Kathryn A.
Ellner, Andrew L.
Decision-making strategies: ignored to the detriment of healthcare training and delivery?
title Decision-making strategies: ignored to the detriment of healthcare training and delivery?
title_full Decision-making strategies: ignored to the detriment of healthcare training and delivery?
title_fullStr Decision-making strategies: ignored to the detriment of healthcare training and delivery?
title_full_unstemmed Decision-making strategies: ignored to the detriment of healthcare training and delivery?
title_short Decision-making strategies: ignored to the detriment of healthcare training and delivery?
title_sort decision-making strategies: ignored to the detriment of healthcare training and delivery?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4164239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25264501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2013.854706
work_keys_str_mv AT desmondchris decisionmakingstrategiesignoredtothedetrimentofhealthcaretraininganddelivery
AT brubakerkathryna decisionmakingstrategiesignoredtothedetrimentofhealthcaretraininganddelivery
AT ellnerandrewl decisionmakingstrategiesignoredtothedetrimentofhealthcaretraininganddelivery