Cargando…

Comparisons of Measured and Self-Reported Anthropometric Variables and Blood Pressure in a Sample of Hong Kong Female Nurses

OBJECTIVES: To assess the validity of self-reported weight, height, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference and blood pressure compared with standardized clinical measurements and to determine the classification accuracy in overweight/obesity and central adiposity. METHODS: This pilot study was i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Yao Jie, Ho, Suzanne C., Liu, Zhao Min, Hui, Stanley Sai-Chuen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4164524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25222707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107233
_version_ 1782334967246749696
author Xie, Yao Jie
Ho, Suzanne C.
Liu, Zhao Min
Hui, Stanley Sai-Chuen
author_facet Xie, Yao Jie
Ho, Suzanne C.
Liu, Zhao Min
Hui, Stanley Sai-Chuen
author_sort Xie, Yao Jie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the validity of self-reported weight, height, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference and blood pressure compared with standardized clinical measurements and to determine the classification accuracy in overweight/obesity and central adiposity. METHODS: This pilot study was integrated into a life-course study entitled “Hong Kong Women's Health Study” among 1,253 female nurses in Hong Kong who were aged 35 years to 65 years. Data were collected from self-administered questionnaires that were mailed to the respondents. Of these participants, we obtained the standard body measurements of 144 (11.5%) at our research center. We then compared the self-reported anthropometric variables and blood pressure with the measured data to assess validity based on the level of misreporting, percentage of agreement, consistency, sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: The self-reported and measured values were highly correlated in terms of anthropometry and blood pressure (correlation coefficients ranged from 0.72 to 0.96). Height was overestimated at an average of 0.42 cm, and waist circumference was underestimated at 2.33 cm (both P<0.05), while no significant differences were observed from weight, blood pressure and BMI (all P>0.05). The proportions of overweight, obesity, and central adiposity by self-reported data did not vary greatly from the measured data (all P>0.05). The self-reporting resulted in correct classifications of BMI, waist circumference, and systolic blood pressure in 85%, 78%, and 87% of women, with corresponding Kappa index values of 0.79, 0.55, and 0.82, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity were 84.6% and 95.7%, respectively, with respect to overweight/obesity detection, whereas those for central adiposity detection were 70.6% and 83.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In a sample of female Hong Kong nurses, the self-reported measures of height, weight, BMI, waist circumference and blood pressure were generally valid. Furthermore, the classification accuracies of overweight/obesity and central adiposity were acceptable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4164524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41645242014-09-19 Comparisons of Measured and Self-Reported Anthropometric Variables and Blood Pressure in a Sample of Hong Kong Female Nurses Xie, Yao Jie Ho, Suzanne C. Liu, Zhao Min Hui, Stanley Sai-Chuen PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: To assess the validity of self-reported weight, height, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference and blood pressure compared with standardized clinical measurements and to determine the classification accuracy in overweight/obesity and central adiposity. METHODS: This pilot study was integrated into a life-course study entitled “Hong Kong Women's Health Study” among 1,253 female nurses in Hong Kong who were aged 35 years to 65 years. Data were collected from self-administered questionnaires that were mailed to the respondents. Of these participants, we obtained the standard body measurements of 144 (11.5%) at our research center. We then compared the self-reported anthropometric variables and blood pressure with the measured data to assess validity based on the level of misreporting, percentage of agreement, consistency, sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: The self-reported and measured values were highly correlated in terms of anthropometry and blood pressure (correlation coefficients ranged from 0.72 to 0.96). Height was overestimated at an average of 0.42 cm, and waist circumference was underestimated at 2.33 cm (both P<0.05), while no significant differences were observed from weight, blood pressure and BMI (all P>0.05). The proportions of overweight, obesity, and central adiposity by self-reported data did not vary greatly from the measured data (all P>0.05). The self-reporting resulted in correct classifications of BMI, waist circumference, and systolic blood pressure in 85%, 78%, and 87% of women, with corresponding Kappa index values of 0.79, 0.55, and 0.82, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity were 84.6% and 95.7%, respectively, with respect to overweight/obesity detection, whereas those for central adiposity detection were 70.6% and 83.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In a sample of female Hong Kong nurses, the self-reported measures of height, weight, BMI, waist circumference and blood pressure were generally valid. Furthermore, the classification accuracies of overweight/obesity and central adiposity were acceptable. Public Library of Science 2014-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4164524/ /pubmed/25222707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107233 Text en © 2014 Xie et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xie, Yao Jie
Ho, Suzanne C.
Liu, Zhao Min
Hui, Stanley Sai-Chuen
Comparisons of Measured and Self-Reported Anthropometric Variables and Blood Pressure in a Sample of Hong Kong Female Nurses
title Comparisons of Measured and Self-Reported Anthropometric Variables and Blood Pressure in a Sample of Hong Kong Female Nurses
title_full Comparisons of Measured and Self-Reported Anthropometric Variables and Blood Pressure in a Sample of Hong Kong Female Nurses
title_fullStr Comparisons of Measured and Self-Reported Anthropometric Variables and Blood Pressure in a Sample of Hong Kong Female Nurses
title_full_unstemmed Comparisons of Measured and Self-Reported Anthropometric Variables and Blood Pressure in a Sample of Hong Kong Female Nurses
title_short Comparisons of Measured and Self-Reported Anthropometric Variables and Blood Pressure in a Sample of Hong Kong Female Nurses
title_sort comparisons of measured and self-reported anthropometric variables and blood pressure in a sample of hong kong female nurses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4164524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25222707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107233
work_keys_str_mv AT xieyaojie comparisonsofmeasuredandselfreportedanthropometricvariablesandbloodpressureinasampleofhongkongfemalenurses
AT hosuzannec comparisonsofmeasuredandselfreportedanthropometricvariablesandbloodpressureinasampleofhongkongfemalenurses
AT liuzhaomin comparisonsofmeasuredandselfreportedanthropometricvariablesandbloodpressureinasampleofhongkongfemalenurses
AT huistanleysaichuen comparisonsofmeasuredandselfreportedanthropometricvariablesandbloodpressureinasampleofhongkongfemalenurses