Cargando…

The perplexity of prescribing and switching of biologic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: a UK regional audit of practice

BACKGROUND: Biologic drugs are expensive treatments used in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Switching among them is common practice in patients who have had an inadequate response or intolerable adverse events. The National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) UK, which aims to curtail post...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blake, Tim, Rao, Vijay, Hashmi, Tahir, Erb, Nicola, O’Reilly, Sheila Catherine, Shaffu, Shireen, Obrenovic, Karen, Packham, Jon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4164745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25182696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-290
_version_ 1782334999683399680
author Blake, Tim
Rao, Vijay
Hashmi, Tahir
Erb, Nicola
O’Reilly, Sheila Catherine
Shaffu, Shireen
Obrenovic, Karen
Packham, Jon
author_facet Blake, Tim
Rao, Vijay
Hashmi, Tahir
Erb, Nicola
O’Reilly, Sheila Catherine
Shaffu, Shireen
Obrenovic, Karen
Packham, Jon
author_sort Blake, Tim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Biologic drugs are expensive treatments used in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Switching among them is common practice in patients who have had an inadequate response or intolerable adverse events. The National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) UK, which aims to curtail postcode prescribing, has provided guidance on the sequential prescription of these drugs. This study sought to evaluate the extent to which rheumatology centres across the Midlands were complying with NICE guidance on the switching of biologic drugs in RA, as well as analyse the various prescribing patterns of these drugs. METHODS: Data was collected via a web-based tool on RA patients who had undergone at least one switch of a biologic drug during 2011. The standards specified in NICE technology appraisals (TA130, TA186, TA195, TA198, and TA225) were used to assess compliance with NICE guidance. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: There were 335 biologic drug switches in 317 patients. The most common reason given for switching to a drug was NICE guidelines (242, 72.2%), followed by Physician's choice (122, 33.4%). Lack of effect was the most common reason for discontinuing a drug (224, 67%). For patients on Rituximab, Methotrexate was used in 133 switches (76.9% of the time). Overall NICE compliance for all units was 65% (range 50 to 100%), with anti-TNFα to anti-TNFα switches for inefficacy making up the majority of non-compliant switches. CONCLUSION: This study draws attention to the enigma and disparity of commissioning and prescribing of biologic drugs in RA. Currently the evidence would not support switching of a biologic drug for non-clinical purposes such as economic pressures. Flexibility in prescribing should be encouraged: biologic therapy should be individualised based on the mode of action and likely tolerability of these drugs. Further work should focus on the evidence for using particular sequences of biologic drugs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-290) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4164745
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41647452014-09-17 The perplexity of prescribing and switching of biologic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: a UK regional audit of practice Blake, Tim Rao, Vijay Hashmi, Tahir Erb, Nicola O’Reilly, Sheila Catherine Shaffu, Shireen Obrenovic, Karen Packham, Jon BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Biologic drugs are expensive treatments used in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Switching among them is common practice in patients who have had an inadequate response or intolerable adverse events. The National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) UK, which aims to curtail postcode prescribing, has provided guidance on the sequential prescription of these drugs. This study sought to evaluate the extent to which rheumatology centres across the Midlands were complying with NICE guidance on the switching of biologic drugs in RA, as well as analyse the various prescribing patterns of these drugs. METHODS: Data was collected via a web-based tool on RA patients who had undergone at least one switch of a biologic drug during 2011. The standards specified in NICE technology appraisals (TA130, TA186, TA195, TA198, and TA225) were used to assess compliance with NICE guidance. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: There were 335 biologic drug switches in 317 patients. The most common reason given for switching to a drug was NICE guidelines (242, 72.2%), followed by Physician's choice (122, 33.4%). Lack of effect was the most common reason for discontinuing a drug (224, 67%). For patients on Rituximab, Methotrexate was used in 133 switches (76.9% of the time). Overall NICE compliance for all units was 65% (range 50 to 100%), with anti-TNFα to anti-TNFα switches for inefficacy making up the majority of non-compliant switches. CONCLUSION: This study draws attention to the enigma and disparity of commissioning and prescribing of biologic drugs in RA. Currently the evidence would not support switching of a biologic drug for non-clinical purposes such as economic pressures. Flexibility in prescribing should be encouraged: biologic therapy should be individualised based on the mode of action and likely tolerability of these drugs. Further work should focus on the evidence for using particular sequences of biologic drugs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-290) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4164745/ /pubmed/25182696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-290 Text en © Blake et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Blake, Tim
Rao, Vijay
Hashmi, Tahir
Erb, Nicola
O’Reilly, Sheila Catherine
Shaffu, Shireen
Obrenovic, Karen
Packham, Jon
The perplexity of prescribing and switching of biologic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: a UK regional audit of practice
title The perplexity of prescribing and switching of biologic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: a UK regional audit of practice
title_full The perplexity of prescribing and switching of biologic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: a UK regional audit of practice
title_fullStr The perplexity of prescribing and switching of biologic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: a UK regional audit of practice
title_full_unstemmed The perplexity of prescribing and switching of biologic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: a UK regional audit of practice
title_short The perplexity of prescribing and switching of biologic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: a UK regional audit of practice
title_sort perplexity of prescribing and switching of biologic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: a uk regional audit of practice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4164745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25182696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-290
work_keys_str_mv AT blaketim theperplexityofprescribingandswitchingofbiologicdrugsinrheumatoidarthritisaukregionalauditofpractice
AT raovijay theperplexityofprescribingandswitchingofbiologicdrugsinrheumatoidarthritisaukregionalauditofpractice
AT hashmitahir theperplexityofprescribingandswitchingofbiologicdrugsinrheumatoidarthritisaukregionalauditofpractice
AT erbnicola theperplexityofprescribingandswitchingofbiologicdrugsinrheumatoidarthritisaukregionalauditofpractice
AT oreillysheilacatherine theperplexityofprescribingandswitchingofbiologicdrugsinrheumatoidarthritisaukregionalauditofpractice
AT shaffushireen theperplexityofprescribingandswitchingofbiologicdrugsinrheumatoidarthritisaukregionalauditofpractice
AT obrenovickaren theperplexityofprescribingandswitchingofbiologicdrugsinrheumatoidarthritisaukregionalauditofpractice
AT packhamjon theperplexityofprescribingandswitchingofbiologicdrugsinrheumatoidarthritisaukregionalauditofpractice
AT blaketim perplexityofprescribingandswitchingofbiologicdrugsinrheumatoidarthritisaukregionalauditofpractice
AT raovijay perplexityofprescribingandswitchingofbiologicdrugsinrheumatoidarthritisaukregionalauditofpractice
AT hashmitahir perplexityofprescribingandswitchingofbiologicdrugsinrheumatoidarthritisaukregionalauditofpractice
AT erbnicola perplexityofprescribingandswitchingofbiologicdrugsinrheumatoidarthritisaukregionalauditofpractice
AT oreillysheilacatherine perplexityofprescribingandswitchingofbiologicdrugsinrheumatoidarthritisaukregionalauditofpractice
AT shaffushireen perplexityofprescribingandswitchingofbiologicdrugsinrheumatoidarthritisaukregionalauditofpractice
AT obrenovickaren perplexityofprescribingandswitchingofbiologicdrugsinrheumatoidarthritisaukregionalauditofpractice
AT packhamjon perplexityofprescribingandswitchingofbiologicdrugsinrheumatoidarthritisaukregionalauditofpractice