Cargando…

Vasopressin in Hemorrhagic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Animal Trials

Objective. The latest European guidelines for the management of hemorrhagic shock suggest the use of vasopressors (norepinephrine) in order to restore an adequate mean arterial pressure when fluid resuscitation therapy fails to restore blood pressure. The administration of arginine vasopressin (AVP)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cossu, Andrea Pasquale, Mura, Paolo, De Giudici, Lorenzo Matteo, Puddu, Daniela, Pasin, Laura, Evangelista, Maurizio, Xanthos, Theodoros, Musu, Mario, Finco, Gabriele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4165559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25254206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/421291
_version_ 1782335117123911680
author Cossu, Andrea Pasquale
Mura, Paolo
De Giudici, Lorenzo Matteo
Puddu, Daniela
Pasin, Laura
Evangelista, Maurizio
Xanthos, Theodoros
Musu, Mario
Finco, Gabriele
author_facet Cossu, Andrea Pasquale
Mura, Paolo
De Giudici, Lorenzo Matteo
Puddu, Daniela
Pasin, Laura
Evangelista, Maurizio
Xanthos, Theodoros
Musu, Mario
Finco, Gabriele
author_sort Cossu, Andrea Pasquale
collection PubMed
description Objective. The latest European guidelines for the management of hemorrhagic shock suggest the use of vasopressors (norepinephrine) in order to restore an adequate mean arterial pressure when fluid resuscitation therapy fails to restore blood pressure. The administration of arginine vasopressin (AVP), or its analogue terlipressin, has been proposed as an alternative treatment in the early stages of hypovolemic shock. Design. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled animal trials. Participants. A total of 433 animals from 15 studies were included. Interventions. The ability of AVP and terlipressin to reduce mortality when compared with fluid resuscitation therapy, other vasopressors (norepinephrine or epinephrine), or placebo was investigated. Measurements and Main Results. Pooled estimates showed that AVP and terlipressin consistently and significantly improve survival in hemorrhagic shock (mortality: 26/174 (15%) in the AVP group versus 164/259 (63%) in the control arms; OR = 0.09; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.15; P for effect < 0.001; P for heterogeneity = 0.30; I (2) = 14%). Conclusions. Results suggest that AVP and terlipressin improve survival in the early phases of animal models of hemorrhagic shock. Vasopressin seems to be more effective than all other treatments, including other vasopressor drugs. These results need to be confirmed by human clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4165559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41655592014-09-24 Vasopressin in Hemorrhagic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Animal Trials Cossu, Andrea Pasquale Mura, Paolo De Giudici, Lorenzo Matteo Puddu, Daniela Pasin, Laura Evangelista, Maurizio Xanthos, Theodoros Musu, Mario Finco, Gabriele Biomed Res Int Review Article Objective. The latest European guidelines for the management of hemorrhagic shock suggest the use of vasopressors (norepinephrine) in order to restore an adequate mean arterial pressure when fluid resuscitation therapy fails to restore blood pressure. The administration of arginine vasopressin (AVP), or its analogue terlipressin, has been proposed as an alternative treatment in the early stages of hypovolemic shock. Design. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled animal trials. Participants. A total of 433 animals from 15 studies were included. Interventions. The ability of AVP and terlipressin to reduce mortality when compared with fluid resuscitation therapy, other vasopressors (norepinephrine or epinephrine), or placebo was investigated. Measurements and Main Results. Pooled estimates showed that AVP and terlipressin consistently and significantly improve survival in hemorrhagic shock (mortality: 26/174 (15%) in the AVP group versus 164/259 (63%) in the control arms; OR = 0.09; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.15; P for effect < 0.001; P for heterogeneity = 0.30; I (2) = 14%). Conclusions. Results suggest that AVP and terlipressin improve survival in the early phases of animal models of hemorrhagic shock. Vasopressin seems to be more effective than all other treatments, including other vasopressor drugs. These results need to be confirmed by human clinical trials. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4165559/ /pubmed/25254206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/421291 Text en Copyright © 2014 Andrea Pasquale Cossu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Cossu, Andrea Pasquale
Mura, Paolo
De Giudici, Lorenzo Matteo
Puddu, Daniela
Pasin, Laura
Evangelista, Maurizio
Xanthos, Theodoros
Musu, Mario
Finco, Gabriele
Vasopressin in Hemorrhagic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Animal Trials
title Vasopressin in Hemorrhagic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Animal Trials
title_full Vasopressin in Hemorrhagic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Animal Trials
title_fullStr Vasopressin in Hemorrhagic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Animal Trials
title_full_unstemmed Vasopressin in Hemorrhagic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Animal Trials
title_short Vasopressin in Hemorrhagic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Animal Trials
title_sort vasopressin in hemorrhagic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized animal trials
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4165559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25254206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/421291
work_keys_str_mv AT cossuandreapasquale vasopressininhemorrhagicshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedanimaltrials
AT murapaolo vasopressininhemorrhagicshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedanimaltrials
AT degiudicilorenzomatteo vasopressininhemorrhagicshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedanimaltrials
AT puddudaniela vasopressininhemorrhagicshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedanimaltrials
AT pasinlaura vasopressininhemorrhagicshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedanimaltrials
AT evangelistamaurizio vasopressininhemorrhagicshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedanimaltrials
AT xanthostheodoros vasopressininhemorrhagicshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedanimaltrials
AT musumario vasopressininhemorrhagicshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedanimaltrials
AT fincogabriele vasopressininhemorrhagicshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedanimaltrials