Cargando…

A review of prospective Clinical Trials for neurogenic bladder: The place of surgery, experimental techniques and devices

INTRODUCTION: The neurogenic urinary bladder has been known for at least 30 years now and the concepts behind it are continuously evolving, but there is actually not much work that has been done to accumulate solid clinical evidence in this field. We review the surgical and experimental techniques u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Persu, Cristian, Braschi, Emmanuel, Lavelle, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Polish Urological Association 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4165669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25247086
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2014.03.art12
_version_ 1782335132308340736
author Persu, Cristian
Braschi, Emmanuel
Lavelle, John
author_facet Persu, Cristian
Braschi, Emmanuel
Lavelle, John
author_sort Persu, Cristian
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The neurogenic urinary bladder has been known for at least 30 years now and the concepts behind it are continuously evolving, but there is actually not much work that has been done to accumulate solid clinical evidence in this field. We review the surgical and experimental techniques used in the management of this condition. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To achieve our goal, we performed Internet searches using the same search string: Urinary bladder, neurogenic. In each case, the search was limited to clinical trial, subjects were human and the language was English. After duplicate removal, we obtained a final number of 580 papers. Data was extracted from each paper into a database file and was analyzed separately for adult and pediatric populations. RESULTS: A total of 70 full text papers were reviewed and analyzed according to the previously mentioned algorithm. The first prospective, randomized surgical trials were published less than 20 years ago, starting with 1994, and the number of papers published each year since then has remained in the range of 1–3. The oldest prospective clinical trial for this indication dates back to 1975. The total number of patients included in surgical trials is 3453, out of which 59% are males. The papers include a total of 369 children (21.2%), essentially looking at all the techniques that are also used in adults. CONCLUSIONS: There is still a lot of work to be done in order to obtain a significant level of evidence in the field of surgical procedures used in neurogenic bladder patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4165669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Polish Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41656692014-09-22 A review of prospective Clinical Trials for neurogenic bladder: The place of surgery, experimental techniques and devices Persu, Cristian Braschi, Emmanuel Lavelle, John Cent European J Urol Review Paper INTRODUCTION: The neurogenic urinary bladder has been known for at least 30 years now and the concepts behind it are continuously evolving, but there is actually not much work that has been done to accumulate solid clinical evidence in this field. We review the surgical and experimental techniques used in the management of this condition. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To achieve our goal, we performed Internet searches using the same search string: Urinary bladder, neurogenic. In each case, the search was limited to clinical trial, subjects were human and the language was English. After duplicate removal, we obtained a final number of 580 papers. Data was extracted from each paper into a database file and was analyzed separately for adult and pediatric populations. RESULTS: A total of 70 full text papers were reviewed and analyzed according to the previously mentioned algorithm. The first prospective, randomized surgical trials were published less than 20 years ago, starting with 1994, and the number of papers published each year since then has remained in the range of 1–3. The oldest prospective clinical trial for this indication dates back to 1975. The total number of patients included in surgical trials is 3453, out of which 59% are males. The papers include a total of 369 children (21.2%), essentially looking at all the techniques that are also used in adults. CONCLUSIONS: There is still a lot of work to be done in order to obtain a significant level of evidence in the field of surgical procedures used in neurogenic bladder patients. Polish Urological Association 2014-08-18 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4165669/ /pubmed/25247086 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2014.03.art12 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Paper
Persu, Cristian
Braschi, Emmanuel
Lavelle, John
A review of prospective Clinical Trials for neurogenic bladder: The place of surgery, experimental techniques and devices
title A review of prospective Clinical Trials for neurogenic bladder: The place of surgery, experimental techniques and devices
title_full A review of prospective Clinical Trials for neurogenic bladder: The place of surgery, experimental techniques and devices
title_fullStr A review of prospective Clinical Trials for neurogenic bladder: The place of surgery, experimental techniques and devices
title_full_unstemmed A review of prospective Clinical Trials for neurogenic bladder: The place of surgery, experimental techniques and devices
title_short A review of prospective Clinical Trials for neurogenic bladder: The place of surgery, experimental techniques and devices
title_sort review of prospective clinical trials for neurogenic bladder: the place of surgery, experimental techniques and devices
topic Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4165669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25247086
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2014.03.art12
work_keys_str_mv AT persucristian areviewofprospectiveclinicaltrialsforneurogenicbladdertheplaceofsurgeryexperimentaltechniquesanddevices
AT braschiemmanuel areviewofprospectiveclinicaltrialsforneurogenicbladdertheplaceofsurgeryexperimentaltechniquesanddevices
AT lavellejohn areviewofprospectiveclinicaltrialsforneurogenicbladdertheplaceofsurgeryexperimentaltechniquesanddevices
AT persucristian reviewofprospectiveclinicaltrialsforneurogenicbladdertheplaceofsurgeryexperimentaltechniquesanddevices
AT braschiemmanuel reviewofprospectiveclinicaltrialsforneurogenicbladdertheplaceofsurgeryexperimentaltechniquesanddevices
AT lavellejohn reviewofprospectiveclinicaltrialsforneurogenicbladdertheplaceofsurgeryexperimentaltechniquesanddevices