Cargando…

Impact of urinary stone volume on computed tomography stone attenuations measured in Hounsfield units in a large group of Austrian patients with urolithiasis

INTRODUCTION: To investigate retrospectively the impact of urinary stone volume on computed tomography stone attenuations measured in Hounsfield units in 253 patients with urolithiasis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: CT scans were performed in 253 patients with suspected urinary stone disease from 2008 to 20...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al–Ali, Badereddin Mohamad, Patzak, Johanna, Lutfi, Andre, Pummer, Karl, Augustin, Herbert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Polish Urological Association 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4165675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25247090
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2014.03.art16
_version_ 1782335133817241600
author Al–Ali, Badereddin Mohamad
Patzak, Johanna
Lutfi, Andre
Pummer, Karl
Augustin, Herbert
author_facet Al–Ali, Badereddin Mohamad
Patzak, Johanna
Lutfi, Andre
Pummer, Karl
Augustin, Herbert
author_sort Al–Ali, Badereddin Mohamad
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To investigate retrospectively the impact of urinary stone volume on computed tomography stone attenuations measured in Hounsfield units in 253 patients with urolithiasis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: CT scans were performed in 253 patients with suspected urinary stone disease from 2008 to 2010 using CT–Scanner Siemens, SOMATOM, Sensation 64. One experienced radiologist (A.L) who was blinded to the chemical composition of the stones retrospectively reviewed images and analyzed data to determine the composition of the stones. The results were compared with the biochemical analysis results obtained by infrared spectroscopy (100 FTIR, PerkinElmer). RESULTS: 253 consecutive patients from 2008 to 2010 were included into analysis: 189 males, and 64 females. Mean age was 51.2. According to stone volume, stones were divided into 2 groups: 126 stones with volume of 4.3 mm or more, 127 stones with volume less than 4.3 mm. There was a significant relationship between stone volume and its CT attenuation only in stones with a volume 4.3 mm or more (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We failed to show a significant relationship between stone volume and its attenuations in Hounsfield units. We could not distinguish uric acid stones from non uric acid stones.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4165675
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Polish Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41656752014-09-22 Impact of urinary stone volume on computed tomography stone attenuations measured in Hounsfield units in a large group of Austrian patients with urolithiasis Al–Ali, Badereddin Mohamad Patzak, Johanna Lutfi, Andre Pummer, Karl Augustin, Herbert Cent European J Urol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: To investigate retrospectively the impact of urinary stone volume on computed tomography stone attenuations measured in Hounsfield units in 253 patients with urolithiasis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: CT scans were performed in 253 patients with suspected urinary stone disease from 2008 to 2010 using CT–Scanner Siemens, SOMATOM, Sensation 64. One experienced radiologist (A.L) who was blinded to the chemical composition of the stones retrospectively reviewed images and analyzed data to determine the composition of the stones. The results were compared with the biochemical analysis results obtained by infrared spectroscopy (100 FTIR, PerkinElmer). RESULTS: 253 consecutive patients from 2008 to 2010 were included into analysis: 189 males, and 64 females. Mean age was 51.2. According to stone volume, stones were divided into 2 groups: 126 stones with volume of 4.3 mm or more, 127 stones with volume less than 4.3 mm. There was a significant relationship between stone volume and its CT attenuation only in stones with a volume 4.3 mm or more (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We failed to show a significant relationship between stone volume and its attenuations in Hounsfield units. We could not distinguish uric acid stones from non uric acid stones. Polish Urological Association 2014-08-18 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4165675/ /pubmed/25247090 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2014.03.art16 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Al–Ali, Badereddin Mohamad
Patzak, Johanna
Lutfi, Andre
Pummer, Karl
Augustin, Herbert
Impact of urinary stone volume on computed tomography stone attenuations measured in Hounsfield units in a large group of Austrian patients with urolithiasis
title Impact of urinary stone volume on computed tomography stone attenuations measured in Hounsfield units in a large group of Austrian patients with urolithiasis
title_full Impact of urinary stone volume on computed tomography stone attenuations measured in Hounsfield units in a large group of Austrian patients with urolithiasis
title_fullStr Impact of urinary stone volume on computed tomography stone attenuations measured in Hounsfield units in a large group of Austrian patients with urolithiasis
title_full_unstemmed Impact of urinary stone volume on computed tomography stone attenuations measured in Hounsfield units in a large group of Austrian patients with urolithiasis
title_short Impact of urinary stone volume on computed tomography stone attenuations measured in Hounsfield units in a large group of Austrian patients with urolithiasis
title_sort impact of urinary stone volume on computed tomography stone attenuations measured in hounsfield units in a large group of austrian patients with urolithiasis
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4165675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25247090
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2014.03.art16
work_keys_str_mv AT alalibadereddinmohamad impactofurinarystonevolumeoncomputedtomographystoneattenuationsmeasuredinhounsfieldunitsinalargegroupofaustrianpatientswithurolithiasis
AT patzakjohanna impactofurinarystonevolumeoncomputedtomographystoneattenuationsmeasuredinhounsfieldunitsinalargegroupofaustrianpatientswithurolithiasis
AT lutfiandre impactofurinarystonevolumeoncomputedtomographystoneattenuationsmeasuredinhounsfieldunitsinalargegroupofaustrianpatientswithurolithiasis
AT pummerkarl impactofurinarystonevolumeoncomputedtomographystoneattenuationsmeasuredinhounsfieldunitsinalargegroupofaustrianpatientswithurolithiasis
AT augustinherbert impactofurinarystonevolumeoncomputedtomographystoneattenuationsmeasuredinhounsfieldunitsinalargegroupofaustrianpatientswithurolithiasis