Cargando…
Impact of urinary stone volume on computed tomography stone attenuations measured in Hounsfield units in a large group of Austrian patients with urolithiasis
INTRODUCTION: To investigate retrospectively the impact of urinary stone volume on computed tomography stone attenuations measured in Hounsfield units in 253 patients with urolithiasis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: CT scans were performed in 253 patients with suspected urinary stone disease from 2008 to 20...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Polish Urological Association
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4165675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25247090 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2014.03.art16 |
_version_ | 1782335133817241600 |
---|---|
author | Al–Ali, Badereddin Mohamad Patzak, Johanna Lutfi, Andre Pummer, Karl Augustin, Herbert |
author_facet | Al–Ali, Badereddin Mohamad Patzak, Johanna Lutfi, Andre Pummer, Karl Augustin, Herbert |
author_sort | Al–Ali, Badereddin Mohamad |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: To investigate retrospectively the impact of urinary stone volume on computed tomography stone attenuations measured in Hounsfield units in 253 patients with urolithiasis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: CT scans were performed in 253 patients with suspected urinary stone disease from 2008 to 2010 using CT–Scanner Siemens, SOMATOM, Sensation 64. One experienced radiologist (A.L) who was blinded to the chemical composition of the stones retrospectively reviewed images and analyzed data to determine the composition of the stones. The results were compared with the biochemical analysis results obtained by infrared spectroscopy (100 FTIR, PerkinElmer). RESULTS: 253 consecutive patients from 2008 to 2010 were included into analysis: 189 males, and 64 females. Mean age was 51.2. According to stone volume, stones were divided into 2 groups: 126 stones with volume of 4.3 mm or more, 127 stones with volume less than 4.3 mm. There was a significant relationship between stone volume and its CT attenuation only in stones with a volume 4.3 mm or more (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We failed to show a significant relationship between stone volume and its attenuations in Hounsfield units. We could not distinguish uric acid stones from non uric acid stones. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4165675 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Polish Urological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41656752014-09-22 Impact of urinary stone volume on computed tomography stone attenuations measured in Hounsfield units in a large group of Austrian patients with urolithiasis Al–Ali, Badereddin Mohamad Patzak, Johanna Lutfi, Andre Pummer, Karl Augustin, Herbert Cent European J Urol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: To investigate retrospectively the impact of urinary stone volume on computed tomography stone attenuations measured in Hounsfield units in 253 patients with urolithiasis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: CT scans were performed in 253 patients with suspected urinary stone disease from 2008 to 2010 using CT–Scanner Siemens, SOMATOM, Sensation 64. One experienced radiologist (A.L) who was blinded to the chemical composition of the stones retrospectively reviewed images and analyzed data to determine the composition of the stones. The results were compared with the biochemical analysis results obtained by infrared spectroscopy (100 FTIR, PerkinElmer). RESULTS: 253 consecutive patients from 2008 to 2010 were included into analysis: 189 males, and 64 females. Mean age was 51.2. According to stone volume, stones were divided into 2 groups: 126 stones with volume of 4.3 mm or more, 127 stones with volume less than 4.3 mm. There was a significant relationship between stone volume and its CT attenuation only in stones with a volume 4.3 mm or more (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We failed to show a significant relationship between stone volume and its attenuations in Hounsfield units. We could not distinguish uric acid stones from non uric acid stones. Polish Urological Association 2014-08-18 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4165675/ /pubmed/25247090 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2014.03.art16 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Al–Ali, Badereddin Mohamad Patzak, Johanna Lutfi, Andre Pummer, Karl Augustin, Herbert Impact of urinary stone volume on computed tomography stone attenuations measured in Hounsfield units in a large group of Austrian patients with urolithiasis |
title | Impact of urinary stone volume on computed tomography stone attenuations measured in Hounsfield units in a large group of Austrian patients with urolithiasis |
title_full | Impact of urinary stone volume on computed tomography stone attenuations measured in Hounsfield units in a large group of Austrian patients with urolithiasis |
title_fullStr | Impact of urinary stone volume on computed tomography stone attenuations measured in Hounsfield units in a large group of Austrian patients with urolithiasis |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of urinary stone volume on computed tomography stone attenuations measured in Hounsfield units in a large group of Austrian patients with urolithiasis |
title_short | Impact of urinary stone volume on computed tomography stone attenuations measured in Hounsfield units in a large group of Austrian patients with urolithiasis |
title_sort | impact of urinary stone volume on computed tomography stone attenuations measured in hounsfield units in a large group of austrian patients with urolithiasis |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4165675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25247090 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2014.03.art16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alalibadereddinmohamad impactofurinarystonevolumeoncomputedtomographystoneattenuationsmeasuredinhounsfieldunitsinalargegroupofaustrianpatientswithurolithiasis AT patzakjohanna impactofurinarystonevolumeoncomputedtomographystoneattenuationsmeasuredinhounsfieldunitsinalargegroupofaustrianpatientswithurolithiasis AT lutfiandre impactofurinarystonevolumeoncomputedtomographystoneattenuationsmeasuredinhounsfieldunitsinalargegroupofaustrianpatientswithurolithiasis AT pummerkarl impactofurinarystonevolumeoncomputedtomographystoneattenuationsmeasuredinhounsfieldunitsinalargegroupofaustrianpatientswithurolithiasis AT augustinherbert impactofurinarystonevolumeoncomputedtomographystoneattenuationsmeasuredinhounsfieldunitsinalargegroupofaustrianpatientswithurolithiasis |