Cargando…

Diagnostic Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Small Renal Masses

PURPOSE: Ultrasound (US) is highly sensitive in the detection of renal masses. However, it may not be able to differentiate benign and malignant lesions in smaller masses. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for small renal masses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oh, Tae Hoon, Lee, Young Hwan, Seo, Ill Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Urological Association 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4165921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25237460
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2014.55.9.587
_version_ 1782335163245527040
author Oh, Tae Hoon
Lee, Young Hwan
Seo, Ill Young
author_facet Oh, Tae Hoon
Lee, Young Hwan
Seo, Ill Young
author_sort Oh, Tae Hoon
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Ultrasound (US) is highly sensitive in the detection of renal masses. However, it may not be able to differentiate benign and malignant lesions in smaller masses. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for small renal masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2011 to December 2013, a total of 85 patients underwent CEUS for evaluation of renal masses. Of these patients, CEUS findings were retrospectively analyzed for small renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cases (n=38) and angiomyolipoma (AML) cases (n=11). The tumor echogenicity and enhancement patterns and degrees were evaluated. The diagnostic efficacy of CEUS in differentiating the two diseases was compared. RESULTS: On CEUS, the findings of diffuse heterogeneous enhancement (observed in 78.9% of RCCs and 27.3% of AMLs, p=0.003), washout from hyperenhancement or iso-enhancement to hypoenhancement in late phase (73.7% of RCCs and 18.2% of AMLs, p=0.001), and perilesional rim-like enhancement (57.9% of RCCs and 9.1% of AMLs, p=0.006) were significantly different between AML and RCC cases. The corresponding sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 86.8% (33/38), 63.6% (7/11), 89.2% (33/37), 58.3% (7/12), and 81.6% (40/49), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the characteristic CEUS features could have diagnostic value in the evaluation of small renal mass. CEUS showed a higher diagnostic efficacy than conventional US for differentiating RCC and AML.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4165921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Korean Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41659212014-09-18 Diagnostic Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Small Renal Masses Oh, Tae Hoon Lee, Young Hwan Seo, Ill Young Korean J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: Ultrasound (US) is highly sensitive in the detection of renal masses. However, it may not be able to differentiate benign and malignant lesions in smaller masses. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for small renal masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2011 to December 2013, a total of 85 patients underwent CEUS for evaluation of renal masses. Of these patients, CEUS findings were retrospectively analyzed for small renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cases (n=38) and angiomyolipoma (AML) cases (n=11). The tumor echogenicity and enhancement patterns and degrees were evaluated. The diagnostic efficacy of CEUS in differentiating the two diseases was compared. RESULTS: On CEUS, the findings of diffuse heterogeneous enhancement (observed in 78.9% of RCCs and 27.3% of AMLs, p=0.003), washout from hyperenhancement or iso-enhancement to hypoenhancement in late phase (73.7% of RCCs and 18.2% of AMLs, p=0.001), and perilesional rim-like enhancement (57.9% of RCCs and 9.1% of AMLs, p=0.006) were significantly different between AML and RCC cases. The corresponding sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 86.8% (33/38), 63.6% (7/11), 89.2% (33/37), 58.3% (7/12), and 81.6% (40/49), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the characteristic CEUS features could have diagnostic value in the evaluation of small renal mass. CEUS showed a higher diagnostic efficacy than conventional US for differentiating RCC and AML. The Korean Urological Association 2014-09 2014-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4165921/ /pubmed/25237460 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2014.55.9.587 Text en © The Korean Urological Association, 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Oh, Tae Hoon
Lee, Young Hwan
Seo, Ill Young
Diagnostic Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Small Renal Masses
title Diagnostic Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Small Renal Masses
title_full Diagnostic Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Small Renal Masses
title_fullStr Diagnostic Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Small Renal Masses
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Small Renal Masses
title_short Diagnostic Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Small Renal Masses
title_sort diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for small renal masses
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4165921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25237460
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2014.55.9.587
work_keys_str_mv AT ohtaehoon diagnosticefficacyofcontrastenhancedultrasoundforsmallrenalmasses
AT leeyounghwan diagnosticefficacyofcontrastenhancedultrasoundforsmallrenalmasses
AT seoillyoung diagnosticefficacyofcontrastenhancedultrasoundforsmallrenalmasses