Cargando…
Effect of Improvement in Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms on Sexual Function in Men: Tamsulosin Monotherapy vs. Combination Therapy of Tamsulosin and Solifenacin
PURPOSE: To evaluate how much the improvement of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) affects sexual function and which storage symptoms or voiding symptoms have the greatest effect on sexual function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 187 patients were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Urological Association
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4165924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25237463 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2014.55.9.608 |
_version_ | 1782335164198682624 |
---|---|
author | Ko, Kyungtae Yang, Dae Yul Lee, Won Ki Kim, Sae Woong Moon, Du Geon Moon, Ki Hak Park, Nam Cheol Park, Jong Kwan Son, Hwan Cheol Lee, Sung Won Hyun, Jae Seog Park, Kwangsung |
author_facet | Ko, Kyungtae Yang, Dae Yul Lee, Won Ki Kim, Sae Woong Moon, Du Geon Moon, Ki Hak Park, Nam Cheol Park, Jong Kwan Son, Hwan Cheol Lee, Sung Won Hyun, Jae Seog Park, Kwangsung |
author_sort | Ko, Kyungtae |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate how much the improvement of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) affects sexual function and which storage symptoms or voiding symptoms have the greatest effect on sexual function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 187 patients were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either tamsulosin 0.2 mg (group A) or tamsulosin 0.2 mg and solifenacin 5 mg (group B). At 4 weeks and 12 weeks, the LUTS and sexual function of the patients were evaluated by use of the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF5), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) questionnaire, uroflowmetry, and bladder scan. RESULTS: Both groups A and B showed statistically significant improvements in IPSS, OABSS, and quality of life (QoL). Group A showed improved maximum flow rate, mean flow rate, and residual urine volume by time. Group B did not show an improvement in flow rate or residual urine volume but total voiding volume increased with time. The IIEF5 score was not improved in either group. In group A, the IIEF5 score dropped from 13.66±4.97 to 11.93±6.14 after 12 weeks (p=0.072). Group B showed a decline in the IIEF5 score from 13.19±5.91 to 12.45±6.38 (p=0.299). Although group B showed a relatively smaller decrease in the IIEF5 score, the difference between the two groups was not significant (p=0.696). CONCLUSIONS: Tamsulosin monotherapy and combination therapy with solifenacin did not improve erectile function despite improvements in voiding symptoms and QoL. The improvement in storage symptoms did not affect erectile function. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4165924 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | The Korean Urological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41659242014-09-18 Effect of Improvement in Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms on Sexual Function in Men: Tamsulosin Monotherapy vs. Combination Therapy of Tamsulosin and Solifenacin Ko, Kyungtae Yang, Dae Yul Lee, Won Ki Kim, Sae Woong Moon, Du Geon Moon, Ki Hak Park, Nam Cheol Park, Jong Kwan Son, Hwan Cheol Lee, Sung Won Hyun, Jae Seog Park, Kwangsung Korean J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate how much the improvement of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) affects sexual function and which storage symptoms or voiding symptoms have the greatest effect on sexual function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 187 patients were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either tamsulosin 0.2 mg (group A) or tamsulosin 0.2 mg and solifenacin 5 mg (group B). At 4 weeks and 12 weeks, the LUTS and sexual function of the patients were evaluated by use of the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF5), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) questionnaire, uroflowmetry, and bladder scan. RESULTS: Both groups A and B showed statistically significant improvements in IPSS, OABSS, and quality of life (QoL). Group A showed improved maximum flow rate, mean flow rate, and residual urine volume by time. Group B did not show an improvement in flow rate or residual urine volume but total voiding volume increased with time. The IIEF5 score was not improved in either group. In group A, the IIEF5 score dropped from 13.66±4.97 to 11.93±6.14 after 12 weeks (p=0.072). Group B showed a decline in the IIEF5 score from 13.19±5.91 to 12.45±6.38 (p=0.299). Although group B showed a relatively smaller decrease in the IIEF5 score, the difference between the two groups was not significant (p=0.696). CONCLUSIONS: Tamsulosin monotherapy and combination therapy with solifenacin did not improve erectile function despite improvements in voiding symptoms and QoL. The improvement in storage symptoms did not affect erectile function. The Korean Urological Association 2014-09 2014-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4165924/ /pubmed/25237463 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2014.55.9.608 Text en © The Korean Urological Association, 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ko, Kyungtae Yang, Dae Yul Lee, Won Ki Kim, Sae Woong Moon, Du Geon Moon, Ki Hak Park, Nam Cheol Park, Jong Kwan Son, Hwan Cheol Lee, Sung Won Hyun, Jae Seog Park, Kwangsung Effect of Improvement in Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms on Sexual Function in Men: Tamsulosin Monotherapy vs. Combination Therapy of Tamsulosin and Solifenacin |
title | Effect of Improvement in Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms on Sexual Function in Men: Tamsulosin Monotherapy vs. Combination Therapy of Tamsulosin and Solifenacin |
title_full | Effect of Improvement in Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms on Sexual Function in Men: Tamsulosin Monotherapy vs. Combination Therapy of Tamsulosin and Solifenacin |
title_fullStr | Effect of Improvement in Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms on Sexual Function in Men: Tamsulosin Monotherapy vs. Combination Therapy of Tamsulosin and Solifenacin |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of Improvement in Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms on Sexual Function in Men: Tamsulosin Monotherapy vs. Combination Therapy of Tamsulosin and Solifenacin |
title_short | Effect of Improvement in Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms on Sexual Function in Men: Tamsulosin Monotherapy vs. Combination Therapy of Tamsulosin and Solifenacin |
title_sort | effect of improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms on sexual function in men: tamsulosin monotherapy vs. combination therapy of tamsulosin and solifenacin |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4165924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25237463 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2014.55.9.608 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kokyungtae effectofimprovementinlowerurinarytractsymptomsonsexualfunctioninmentamsulosinmonotherapyvscombinationtherapyoftamsulosinandsolifenacin AT yangdaeyul effectofimprovementinlowerurinarytractsymptomsonsexualfunctioninmentamsulosinmonotherapyvscombinationtherapyoftamsulosinandsolifenacin AT leewonki effectofimprovementinlowerurinarytractsymptomsonsexualfunctioninmentamsulosinmonotherapyvscombinationtherapyoftamsulosinandsolifenacin AT kimsaewoong effectofimprovementinlowerurinarytractsymptomsonsexualfunctioninmentamsulosinmonotherapyvscombinationtherapyoftamsulosinandsolifenacin AT moondugeon effectofimprovementinlowerurinarytractsymptomsonsexualfunctioninmentamsulosinmonotherapyvscombinationtherapyoftamsulosinandsolifenacin AT moonkihak effectofimprovementinlowerurinarytractsymptomsonsexualfunctioninmentamsulosinmonotherapyvscombinationtherapyoftamsulosinandsolifenacin AT parknamcheol effectofimprovementinlowerurinarytractsymptomsonsexualfunctioninmentamsulosinmonotherapyvscombinationtherapyoftamsulosinandsolifenacin AT parkjongkwan effectofimprovementinlowerurinarytractsymptomsonsexualfunctioninmentamsulosinmonotherapyvscombinationtherapyoftamsulosinandsolifenacin AT sonhwancheol effectofimprovementinlowerurinarytractsymptomsonsexualfunctioninmentamsulosinmonotherapyvscombinationtherapyoftamsulosinandsolifenacin AT leesungwon effectofimprovementinlowerurinarytractsymptomsonsexualfunctioninmentamsulosinmonotherapyvscombinationtherapyoftamsulosinandsolifenacin AT hyunjaeseog effectofimprovementinlowerurinarytractsymptomsonsexualfunctioninmentamsulosinmonotherapyvscombinationtherapyoftamsulosinandsolifenacin AT parkkwangsung effectofimprovementinlowerurinarytractsymptomsonsexualfunctioninmentamsulosinmonotherapyvscombinationtherapyoftamsulosinandsolifenacin |