Cargando…

Surface micropattern limits bacterial contamination

BACKGROUND: Bacterial surface contamination contributes to transmission of nosocomial infections. Chemical cleansers used to control surface contamination are often toxic and incorrectly implemented. Additional non-toxic strategies should be combined with regular cleanings to mitigate risks of human...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mann, Ethan E, Manna, Dipankar, Mettetal, Michael R, May, Rhea M, Dannemiller, Elisa M, Chung, Kenneth K, Brennan, Anthony B, Reddy, Shravanthi T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4166016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25232470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-3-28
_version_ 1782335186968510464
author Mann, Ethan E
Manna, Dipankar
Mettetal, Michael R
May, Rhea M
Dannemiller, Elisa M
Chung, Kenneth K
Brennan, Anthony B
Reddy, Shravanthi T
author_facet Mann, Ethan E
Manna, Dipankar
Mettetal, Michael R
May, Rhea M
Dannemiller, Elisa M
Chung, Kenneth K
Brennan, Anthony B
Reddy, Shravanthi T
author_sort Mann, Ethan E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bacterial surface contamination contributes to transmission of nosocomial infections. Chemical cleansers used to control surface contamination are often toxic and incorrectly implemented. Additional non-toxic strategies should be combined with regular cleanings to mitigate risks of human error and further decrease rates of nosocomial infections. The Sharklet micropattern (MP), inspired by shark skin, is an effective tool for reducing bacterial load on surfaces without toxic additives. The studies presented here were carried out to investigate the MP surfaces capability to reduce colonization of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) compared to smooth control surfaces. METHODS: The MP and smooth surfaces produced in acrylic film were compared for remaining bacterial contamination and colonization following inoculation. Direct sampling of surfaces was carried out after inoculation by immersion, spray, and/or touch methods. Ultimately, a combination assay was developed to assess bacterial contamination after touch transfer inoculation combined with drying (persistence) to mimic common environmental contamination scenarios in the clinic or hospital environment. The combination transfer and persistence assay was then used to test antimicrobial copper beside the MP for the ability to reduce MSSA and MRSA challenge. RESULTS: The MP reduced bacterial contamination with log reductions ranging from 87-99% (LR = 0.90-2.18; p < 0.05) compared to smooth control surfaces. The MP was more effective than the 99.9% pure copper alloy C11000 at reducing surface contamination of S. aureus (MSSA and MRSA) through transfer and persistence of bacteria. The MP reduced MSSA by as much as 97% (LR = 1.54; p < 0.01) and MRSA by as much as 94% (LR = 1.26; p < 0.005) compared to smooth controls. Antimicrobial copper had no significant effect on MSSA contamination, but reduced MRSA contamination by 80% (LR = 0.70; p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: The assays developed in this study mimic hospital environmental contamination events to demonstrate the performance of a MP to limit contamination under multiple conditions. Antimicrobial copper has been implemented in hospital room studies to evaluate its impact on nosocomial infections and a decrease in HAI rate was shown. Similar implementation of the MP has potential to reduce the incidence of HAIs although future clinical studies will be necessary to validate the MP’s true impact.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4166016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41660162014-09-18 Surface micropattern limits bacterial contamination Mann, Ethan E Manna, Dipankar Mettetal, Michael R May, Rhea M Dannemiller, Elisa M Chung, Kenneth K Brennan, Anthony B Reddy, Shravanthi T Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: Bacterial surface contamination contributes to transmission of nosocomial infections. Chemical cleansers used to control surface contamination are often toxic and incorrectly implemented. Additional non-toxic strategies should be combined with regular cleanings to mitigate risks of human error and further decrease rates of nosocomial infections. The Sharklet micropattern (MP), inspired by shark skin, is an effective tool for reducing bacterial load on surfaces without toxic additives. The studies presented here were carried out to investigate the MP surfaces capability to reduce colonization of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) compared to smooth control surfaces. METHODS: The MP and smooth surfaces produced in acrylic film were compared for remaining bacterial contamination and colonization following inoculation. Direct sampling of surfaces was carried out after inoculation by immersion, spray, and/or touch methods. Ultimately, a combination assay was developed to assess bacterial contamination after touch transfer inoculation combined with drying (persistence) to mimic common environmental contamination scenarios in the clinic or hospital environment. The combination transfer and persistence assay was then used to test antimicrobial copper beside the MP for the ability to reduce MSSA and MRSA challenge. RESULTS: The MP reduced bacterial contamination with log reductions ranging from 87-99% (LR = 0.90-2.18; p < 0.05) compared to smooth control surfaces. The MP was more effective than the 99.9% pure copper alloy C11000 at reducing surface contamination of S. aureus (MSSA and MRSA) through transfer and persistence of bacteria. The MP reduced MSSA by as much as 97% (LR = 1.54; p < 0.01) and MRSA by as much as 94% (LR = 1.26; p < 0.005) compared to smooth controls. Antimicrobial copper had no significant effect on MSSA contamination, but reduced MRSA contamination by 80% (LR = 0.70; p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: The assays developed in this study mimic hospital environmental contamination events to demonstrate the performance of a MP to limit contamination under multiple conditions. Antimicrobial copper has been implemented in hospital room studies to evaluate its impact on nosocomial infections and a decrease in HAI rate was shown. Similar implementation of the MP has potential to reduce the incidence of HAIs although future clinical studies will be necessary to validate the MP’s true impact. BioMed Central 2014-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4166016/ /pubmed/25232470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-3-28 Text en Copyright © 2014 Mann et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Mann, Ethan E
Manna, Dipankar
Mettetal, Michael R
May, Rhea M
Dannemiller, Elisa M
Chung, Kenneth K
Brennan, Anthony B
Reddy, Shravanthi T
Surface micropattern limits bacterial contamination
title Surface micropattern limits bacterial contamination
title_full Surface micropattern limits bacterial contamination
title_fullStr Surface micropattern limits bacterial contamination
title_full_unstemmed Surface micropattern limits bacterial contamination
title_short Surface micropattern limits bacterial contamination
title_sort surface micropattern limits bacterial contamination
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4166016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25232470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-3-28
work_keys_str_mv AT mannethane surfacemicropatternlimitsbacterialcontamination
AT mannadipankar surfacemicropatternlimitsbacterialcontamination
AT mettetalmichaelr surfacemicropatternlimitsbacterialcontamination
AT mayrheam surfacemicropatternlimitsbacterialcontamination
AT dannemillerelisam surfacemicropatternlimitsbacterialcontamination
AT chungkennethk surfacemicropatternlimitsbacterialcontamination
AT brennananthonyb surfacemicropatternlimitsbacterialcontamination
AT reddyshravanthit surfacemicropatternlimitsbacterialcontamination