Cargando…

Opening research sites in multicentre clinical trials within the UK: a detailed analysis of delays

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the length of time taken to open UK research sites in multicentre clinical trials and to identify reasons for any delays. DESIGN: A case study, recording key milestone dates from the time a site receives ethical approval through to opening to recruitment. Delay reasons were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kearney, Anna, McKay, Andrew, Hickey, Helen, Balabanova, Silviya, Marson, Anthony G, Gamble, Carrol, Williamson, Paula
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4166133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25227630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005874
_version_ 1782335213378994176
author Kearney, Anna
McKay, Andrew
Hickey, Helen
Balabanova, Silviya
Marson, Anthony G
Gamble, Carrol
Williamson, Paula
author_facet Kearney, Anna
McKay, Andrew
Hickey, Helen
Balabanova, Silviya
Marson, Anthony G
Gamble, Carrol
Williamson, Paula
author_sort Kearney, Anna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the length of time taken to open UK research sites in multicentre clinical trials and to identify reasons for any delays. DESIGN: A case study, recording key milestone dates from the time a site receives ethical approval through to opening to recruitment. Delay reasons were prospectively logged by trial staff at a minimum of fortnightly periods using a coding system. SETTING: SANADII, a phase IV pragmatic trial, managed by the Clinical Trials Research Centre, Liverpool. The trial seeks to work with over 100 National Health Service (NHS) sites to meet its recruitment target of 1510 patients. OUTCOMES AND ANALYSIS: The primary outcome was time from Multicentre Regional Ethics Committee (MREC) approval to site opening using survival analysis. Where sites took over a specified time to reach milestones (>3 months from MREC to Site Specific Information (SSI) submission, >30 days from SSI validation to local R&D approval, or >30 days from local Research and Development (R&D) approval to opening to recruitment), the longest continuous delay during that milestone was identified. RESULTS: The median opening time for participating sites was 9.7 months (IQR 6.2 to Not Reached). SSI submission took 7 months (IQR 4.1–12.3) from ethics approval, R&D approval took 16 days (IQR 5.0–32.0) from SSI validation and site opening took 15 days (IQR 8.5–40.0) following R&D approval. The longest delays before SSI submission resulted from negotiating excess treatment costs, finalising logistics, collecting CVs and ongoing participation discussions. CONCLUSIONS: While recently imposed targets are reducing the time taken for R&D departments to approve valid applications, the time taken to open UK research sites remains excessive and must be reduced. At present significant public funds are being used inefficiently in order to navigate NHS systems, challenging the resolve of trial teams and the competitiveness of the UK.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4166133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41661332014-09-22 Opening research sites in multicentre clinical trials within the UK: a detailed analysis of delays Kearney, Anna McKay, Andrew Hickey, Helen Balabanova, Silviya Marson, Anthony G Gamble, Carrol Williamson, Paula BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To investigate the length of time taken to open UK research sites in multicentre clinical trials and to identify reasons for any delays. DESIGN: A case study, recording key milestone dates from the time a site receives ethical approval through to opening to recruitment. Delay reasons were prospectively logged by trial staff at a minimum of fortnightly periods using a coding system. SETTING: SANADII, a phase IV pragmatic trial, managed by the Clinical Trials Research Centre, Liverpool. The trial seeks to work with over 100 National Health Service (NHS) sites to meet its recruitment target of 1510 patients. OUTCOMES AND ANALYSIS: The primary outcome was time from Multicentre Regional Ethics Committee (MREC) approval to site opening using survival analysis. Where sites took over a specified time to reach milestones (>3 months from MREC to Site Specific Information (SSI) submission, >30 days from SSI validation to local R&D approval, or >30 days from local Research and Development (R&D) approval to opening to recruitment), the longest continuous delay during that milestone was identified. RESULTS: The median opening time for participating sites was 9.7 months (IQR 6.2 to Not Reached). SSI submission took 7 months (IQR 4.1–12.3) from ethics approval, R&D approval took 16 days (IQR 5.0–32.0) from SSI validation and site opening took 15 days (IQR 8.5–40.0) following R&D approval. The longest delays before SSI submission resulted from negotiating excess treatment costs, finalising logistics, collecting CVs and ongoing participation discussions. CONCLUSIONS: While recently imposed targets are reducing the time taken for R&D departments to approve valid applications, the time taken to open UK research sites remains excessive and must be reduced. At present significant public funds are being used inefficiently in order to navigate NHS systems, challenging the resolve of trial teams and the competitiveness of the UK. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4166133/ /pubmed/25227630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005874 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Kearney, Anna
McKay, Andrew
Hickey, Helen
Balabanova, Silviya
Marson, Anthony G
Gamble, Carrol
Williamson, Paula
Opening research sites in multicentre clinical trials within the UK: a detailed analysis of delays
title Opening research sites in multicentre clinical trials within the UK: a detailed analysis of delays
title_full Opening research sites in multicentre clinical trials within the UK: a detailed analysis of delays
title_fullStr Opening research sites in multicentre clinical trials within the UK: a detailed analysis of delays
title_full_unstemmed Opening research sites in multicentre clinical trials within the UK: a detailed analysis of delays
title_short Opening research sites in multicentre clinical trials within the UK: a detailed analysis of delays
title_sort opening research sites in multicentre clinical trials within the uk: a detailed analysis of delays
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4166133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25227630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005874
work_keys_str_mv AT kearneyanna openingresearchsitesinmulticentreclinicaltrialswithintheukadetailedanalysisofdelays
AT mckayandrew openingresearchsitesinmulticentreclinicaltrialswithintheukadetailedanalysisofdelays
AT hickeyhelen openingresearchsitesinmulticentreclinicaltrialswithintheukadetailedanalysisofdelays
AT balabanovasilviya openingresearchsitesinmulticentreclinicaltrialswithintheukadetailedanalysisofdelays
AT marsonanthonyg openingresearchsitesinmulticentreclinicaltrialswithintheukadetailedanalysisofdelays
AT gamblecarrol openingresearchsitesinmulticentreclinicaltrialswithintheukadetailedanalysisofdelays
AT williamsonpaula openingresearchsitesinmulticentreclinicaltrialswithintheukadetailedanalysisofdelays