Cargando…

Conservative treatment of adhesive small bowel obstruction in children: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of conservative treatment for adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) in children. DESIGN: Systematic review of studies involved children with ASBO who received initial conservative/non-operative treatment. SETTING: The search was performed in April 2013 using...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Lung-Huang, Lee, Chee-Yew, Hung, Min-Hsuan, Chen, Der-Fang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4166136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25223569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005789
_version_ 1782335214080491520
author Lin, Lung-Huang
Lee, Chee-Yew
Hung, Min-Hsuan
Chen, Der-Fang
author_facet Lin, Lung-Huang
Lee, Chee-Yew
Hung, Min-Hsuan
Chen, Der-Fang
author_sort Lin, Lung-Huang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of conservative treatment for adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) in children. DESIGN: Systematic review of studies involved children with ASBO who received initial conservative/non-operative treatment. SETTING: The search was performed in April 2013 using PubMed (see online supplementary file 1), current contents, and the Cochrane database. PARTICIPANTS: Children with ASBO. INTERVENTIONS: Conservative treatment included nasogastric decompression, parenteral fluids and correction of electrolyte and fluid imbalance. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Treatment success. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Length of hospital stay and the time to first feeding after hospital admission. RESULTS: 7 studies (six retrospective, one prospective), involving 8–109 patients (age: 1 month to 16 years) treated conservatively, were included in the review. The nature of conservative treatment was generally consistent between studies (nasogastric decompression, parenteral fluids and correction of electrolyte and fluid imbalance), although patients in one study also received Gastrografin. The rate of conservative treatment success ranged from 16% to 75% among the five studies, but one trial showed 0% successful rate. The hospital length of stay ranged from 3 to 6.5 days for conservative treatment (vs 10.2–13 days for operative treatment). The time to first feeding ranged from 31 to 84 h for conservative treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, in the majority of cases, conservative treatment is an effective means of managing ASBO in children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4166136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41661362014-09-22 Conservative treatment of adhesive small bowel obstruction in children: a systematic review Lin, Lung-Huang Lee, Chee-Yew Hung, Min-Hsuan Chen, Der-Fang BMJ Open Gastroenterology and Hepatology OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of conservative treatment for adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) in children. DESIGN: Systematic review of studies involved children with ASBO who received initial conservative/non-operative treatment. SETTING: The search was performed in April 2013 using PubMed (see online supplementary file 1), current contents, and the Cochrane database. PARTICIPANTS: Children with ASBO. INTERVENTIONS: Conservative treatment included nasogastric decompression, parenteral fluids and correction of electrolyte and fluid imbalance. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Treatment success. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Length of hospital stay and the time to first feeding after hospital admission. RESULTS: 7 studies (six retrospective, one prospective), involving 8–109 patients (age: 1 month to 16 years) treated conservatively, were included in the review. The nature of conservative treatment was generally consistent between studies (nasogastric decompression, parenteral fluids and correction of electrolyte and fluid imbalance), although patients in one study also received Gastrografin. The rate of conservative treatment success ranged from 16% to 75% among the five studies, but one trial showed 0% successful rate. The hospital length of stay ranged from 3 to 6.5 days for conservative treatment (vs 10.2–13 days for operative treatment). The time to first feeding ranged from 31 to 84 h for conservative treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, in the majority of cases, conservative treatment is an effective means of managing ASBO in children. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4166136/ /pubmed/25223569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005789 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Lin, Lung-Huang
Lee, Chee-Yew
Hung, Min-Hsuan
Chen, Der-Fang
Conservative treatment of adhesive small bowel obstruction in children: a systematic review
title Conservative treatment of adhesive small bowel obstruction in children: a systematic review
title_full Conservative treatment of adhesive small bowel obstruction in children: a systematic review
title_fullStr Conservative treatment of adhesive small bowel obstruction in children: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Conservative treatment of adhesive small bowel obstruction in children: a systematic review
title_short Conservative treatment of adhesive small bowel obstruction in children: a systematic review
title_sort conservative treatment of adhesive small bowel obstruction in children: a systematic review
topic Gastroenterology and Hepatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4166136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25223569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005789
work_keys_str_mv AT linlunghuang conservativetreatmentofadhesivesmallbowelobstructioninchildrenasystematicreview
AT leecheeyew conservativetreatmentofadhesivesmallbowelobstructioninchildrenasystematicreview
AT hungminhsuan conservativetreatmentofadhesivesmallbowelobstructioninchildrenasystematicreview
AT chenderfang conservativetreatmentofadhesivesmallbowelobstructioninchildrenasystematicreview