Cargando…
A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol
INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer among women. In Germany, women are invited to a population-based mammography screening programme for the first time at the age of 50. Since it is still discussed whether the benefits of mammography screening outweigh its harms, the concept of...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4166244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25231495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006145 |
_version_ | 1782335225624264704 |
---|---|
author | Berens, Eva-Maria Reder, Maren Kolip, Petra Spallek, Jacob |
author_facet | Berens, Eva-Maria Reder, Maren Kolip, Petra Spallek, Jacob |
author_sort | Berens, Eva-Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer among women. In Germany, women are invited to a population-based mammography screening programme for the first time at the age of 50. Since it is still discussed whether the benefits of mammography screening outweigh its harms, the concept of informed choice has gained importance. The objective of this cross-sectional study is to assess the proportion of informed choices in the mammography screening programme. A special focus is on the examination of the impact of Turkish migration background and educational level on informed choices. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The proportion of informed choices is evaluated in a cross-sectional study with 3-month follow-up for behavioural implementation of the screening intention. A randomly selected sample of 17 000 women aged 50 years living in Westphalia-Lippe, a region in the Federal State of North-Rhine Westphalia, is invited to participate in this study. To reach adequate numbers of Turkish women, all possibly Turkish women in the sample are identified through a name algorithm and contacted. The sample is drawn from women registered in the study area for which the registration offices consented to supply data for the study (88% of all towns/cities in the study region). Women identified through the Turkish name algorithm received all materials in German and Turkish. The primary outcome is informed choice. Data are collected on informed choice components (knowledge, attitude, decision/implementation) as well as on its possible determinants (eg, health behaviour, perceived behavioural control, subjective norms, invitation status, migration background and other demographic variables). Data are collected before the screening appointment and at 3 months follow-up. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the ethical committee of the Medical Faculty of Muenster University. Results will be published in a relevant scientific journal and communicated to respondents and relevant institutions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4166244 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41662442014-09-22 A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol Berens, Eva-Maria Reder, Maren Kolip, Petra Spallek, Jacob BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer among women. In Germany, women are invited to a population-based mammography screening programme for the first time at the age of 50. Since it is still discussed whether the benefits of mammography screening outweigh its harms, the concept of informed choice has gained importance. The objective of this cross-sectional study is to assess the proportion of informed choices in the mammography screening programme. A special focus is on the examination of the impact of Turkish migration background and educational level on informed choices. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The proportion of informed choices is evaluated in a cross-sectional study with 3-month follow-up for behavioural implementation of the screening intention. A randomly selected sample of 17 000 women aged 50 years living in Westphalia-Lippe, a region in the Federal State of North-Rhine Westphalia, is invited to participate in this study. To reach adequate numbers of Turkish women, all possibly Turkish women in the sample are identified through a name algorithm and contacted. The sample is drawn from women registered in the study area for which the registration offices consented to supply data for the study (88% of all towns/cities in the study region). Women identified through the Turkish name algorithm received all materials in German and Turkish. The primary outcome is informed choice. Data are collected on informed choice components (knowledge, attitude, decision/implementation) as well as on its possible determinants (eg, health behaviour, perceived behavioural control, subjective norms, invitation status, migration background and other demographic variables). Data are collected before the screening appointment and at 3 months follow-up. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the ethical committee of the Medical Faculty of Muenster University. Results will be published in a relevant scientific journal and communicated to respondents and relevant institutions. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4166244/ /pubmed/25231495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006145 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Public Health Berens, Eva-Maria Reder, Maren Kolip, Petra Spallek, Jacob A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol |
title | A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol |
title_full | A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol |
title_fullStr | A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol |
title_short | A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol |
title_sort | cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in germany (inema): a study protocol |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4166244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25231495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006145 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT berensevamaria acrosssectionalstudyoninformedchoiceinthemammographyscreeningprogrammeingermanyinemaastudyprotocol AT redermaren acrosssectionalstudyoninformedchoiceinthemammographyscreeningprogrammeingermanyinemaastudyprotocol AT kolippetra acrosssectionalstudyoninformedchoiceinthemammographyscreeningprogrammeingermanyinemaastudyprotocol AT spallekjacob acrosssectionalstudyoninformedchoiceinthemammographyscreeningprogrammeingermanyinemaastudyprotocol AT berensevamaria crosssectionalstudyoninformedchoiceinthemammographyscreeningprogrammeingermanyinemaastudyprotocol AT redermaren crosssectionalstudyoninformedchoiceinthemammographyscreeningprogrammeingermanyinemaastudyprotocol AT kolippetra crosssectionalstudyoninformedchoiceinthemammographyscreeningprogrammeingermanyinemaastudyprotocol AT spallekjacob crosssectionalstudyoninformedchoiceinthemammographyscreeningprogrammeingermanyinemaastudyprotocol |