Cargando…

A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer among women. In Germany, women are invited to a population-based mammography screening programme for the first time at the age of 50. Since it is still discussed whether the benefits of mammography screening outweigh its harms, the concept of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berens, Eva-Maria, Reder, Maren, Kolip, Petra, Spallek, Jacob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4166244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25231495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006145
_version_ 1782335225624264704
author Berens, Eva-Maria
Reder, Maren
Kolip, Petra
Spallek, Jacob
author_facet Berens, Eva-Maria
Reder, Maren
Kolip, Petra
Spallek, Jacob
author_sort Berens, Eva-Maria
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer among women. In Germany, women are invited to a population-based mammography screening programme for the first time at the age of 50. Since it is still discussed whether the benefits of mammography screening outweigh its harms, the concept of informed choice has gained importance. The objective of this cross-sectional study is to assess the proportion of informed choices in the mammography screening programme. A special focus is on the examination of the impact of Turkish migration background and educational level on informed choices. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The proportion of informed choices is evaluated in a cross-sectional study with 3-month follow-up for behavioural implementation of the screening intention. A randomly selected sample of 17 000 women aged 50 years living in Westphalia-Lippe, a region in the Federal State of North-Rhine Westphalia, is invited to participate in this study. To reach adequate numbers of Turkish women, all possibly Turkish women in the sample are identified through a name algorithm and contacted. The sample is drawn from women registered in the study area for which the registration offices consented to supply data for the study (88% of all towns/cities in the study region). Women identified through the Turkish name algorithm received all materials in German and Turkish. The primary outcome is informed choice. Data are collected on informed choice components (knowledge, attitude, decision/implementation) as well as on its possible determinants (eg, health behaviour, perceived behavioural control, subjective norms, invitation status, migration background and other demographic variables). Data are collected before the screening appointment and at 3 months follow-up. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the ethical committee of the Medical Faculty of Muenster University. Results will be published in a relevant scientific journal and communicated to respondents and relevant institutions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4166244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41662442014-09-22 A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol Berens, Eva-Maria Reder, Maren Kolip, Petra Spallek, Jacob BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer among women. In Germany, women are invited to a population-based mammography screening programme for the first time at the age of 50. Since it is still discussed whether the benefits of mammography screening outweigh its harms, the concept of informed choice has gained importance. The objective of this cross-sectional study is to assess the proportion of informed choices in the mammography screening programme. A special focus is on the examination of the impact of Turkish migration background and educational level on informed choices. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The proportion of informed choices is evaluated in a cross-sectional study with 3-month follow-up for behavioural implementation of the screening intention. A randomly selected sample of 17 000 women aged 50 years living in Westphalia-Lippe, a region in the Federal State of North-Rhine Westphalia, is invited to participate in this study. To reach adequate numbers of Turkish women, all possibly Turkish women in the sample are identified through a name algorithm and contacted. The sample is drawn from women registered in the study area for which the registration offices consented to supply data for the study (88% of all towns/cities in the study region). Women identified through the Turkish name algorithm received all materials in German and Turkish. The primary outcome is informed choice. Data are collected on informed choice components (knowledge, attitude, decision/implementation) as well as on its possible determinants (eg, health behaviour, perceived behavioural control, subjective norms, invitation status, migration background and other demographic variables). Data are collected before the screening appointment and at 3 months follow-up. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the ethical committee of the Medical Faculty of Muenster University. Results will be published in a relevant scientific journal and communicated to respondents and relevant institutions. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4166244/ /pubmed/25231495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006145 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Public Health
Berens, Eva-Maria
Reder, Maren
Kolip, Petra
Spallek, Jacob
A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol
title A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol
title_full A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol
title_fullStr A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol
title_full_unstemmed A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol
title_short A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol
title_sort cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in germany (inema): a study protocol
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4166244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25231495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006145
work_keys_str_mv AT berensevamaria acrosssectionalstudyoninformedchoiceinthemammographyscreeningprogrammeingermanyinemaastudyprotocol
AT redermaren acrosssectionalstudyoninformedchoiceinthemammographyscreeningprogrammeingermanyinemaastudyprotocol
AT kolippetra acrosssectionalstudyoninformedchoiceinthemammographyscreeningprogrammeingermanyinemaastudyprotocol
AT spallekjacob acrosssectionalstudyoninformedchoiceinthemammographyscreeningprogrammeingermanyinemaastudyprotocol
AT berensevamaria crosssectionalstudyoninformedchoiceinthemammographyscreeningprogrammeingermanyinemaastudyprotocol
AT redermaren crosssectionalstudyoninformedchoiceinthemammographyscreeningprogrammeingermanyinemaastudyprotocol
AT kolippetra crosssectionalstudyoninformedchoiceinthemammographyscreeningprogrammeingermanyinemaastudyprotocol
AT spallekjacob crosssectionalstudyoninformedchoiceinthemammographyscreeningprogrammeingermanyinemaastudyprotocol