Cargando…
Balancing the excitability of M1 circuitry during movement observation without overt replication
Although observation of a movement increases the excitability of the motor system of the observer, it does not induce a motor replica. What is the mechanism for replica suppression? We performed a series of experiments, involving a total of 66 healthy humans, to explore the excitability of different...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4166319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25278854 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00316 |
_version_ | 1782335244863537152 |
---|---|
author | Arias, Pablo Robles-García, Verónica Corral-Bergantiños, Yoanna Espinosa, Nelson Mordillo-Mateos, Laura Grieve, Kenneth Oliviero, Antonio Cudeiro, Javier |
author_facet | Arias, Pablo Robles-García, Verónica Corral-Bergantiños, Yoanna Espinosa, Nelson Mordillo-Mateos, Laura Grieve, Kenneth Oliviero, Antonio Cudeiro, Javier |
author_sort | Arias, Pablo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although observation of a movement increases the excitability of the motor system of the observer, it does not induce a motor replica. What is the mechanism for replica suppression? We performed a series of experiments, involving a total of 66 healthy humans, to explore the excitability of different M1 circuits and the spinal cord during observation of simple movements. Several strategies were used. In the first and second experimental blocks, we used several delay times from movement onset to evaluate the time-course modulation of the cortico-spinal excitability (CSE), and its potential dependency on the duration of the movement observed; in order to do this single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over M1 was used. In subsequent experiments, at selected delay times from movement-onset, we probed the excitability of the cortico-spinal circuits using three different approaches: (i) electric cervicomedullary stimulation (CMS), to test spinal excitability, (ii) paired-pulse TMS over M1, to evaluate the cortical inhibitory-excitatory balance (short intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF)], and (iii) continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS), to modulate the excitability of M1 cortical circuits. We observed a stereotyped response in the modulation of CSE. At 500 ms after movement-onset the ICF was increased; although the most clear-cut effect was a decrease of CSE. The compensatory mechanism was not explained by changes in SICI, but by M1-intracortical circuits targeted by cTBS. Meanwhile, the spinal cord maintained the elevated level of excitability induced when expecting to observe movements, potentially useful to facilitate any required response to the movement observed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4166319 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41663192014-10-02 Balancing the excitability of M1 circuitry during movement observation without overt replication Arias, Pablo Robles-García, Verónica Corral-Bergantiños, Yoanna Espinosa, Nelson Mordillo-Mateos, Laura Grieve, Kenneth Oliviero, Antonio Cudeiro, Javier Front Behav Neurosci Neuroscience Although observation of a movement increases the excitability of the motor system of the observer, it does not induce a motor replica. What is the mechanism for replica suppression? We performed a series of experiments, involving a total of 66 healthy humans, to explore the excitability of different M1 circuits and the spinal cord during observation of simple movements. Several strategies were used. In the first and second experimental blocks, we used several delay times from movement onset to evaluate the time-course modulation of the cortico-spinal excitability (CSE), and its potential dependency on the duration of the movement observed; in order to do this single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over M1 was used. In subsequent experiments, at selected delay times from movement-onset, we probed the excitability of the cortico-spinal circuits using three different approaches: (i) electric cervicomedullary stimulation (CMS), to test spinal excitability, (ii) paired-pulse TMS over M1, to evaluate the cortical inhibitory-excitatory balance (short intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF)], and (iii) continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS), to modulate the excitability of M1 cortical circuits. We observed a stereotyped response in the modulation of CSE. At 500 ms after movement-onset the ICF was increased; although the most clear-cut effect was a decrease of CSE. The compensatory mechanism was not explained by changes in SICI, but by M1-intracortical circuits targeted by cTBS. Meanwhile, the spinal cord maintained the elevated level of excitability induced when expecting to observe movements, potentially useful to facilitate any required response to the movement observed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4166319/ /pubmed/25278854 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00316 Text en Copyright © 2014 Arias, Robles-García, Corral-Bergantiños, Espinosa, Mordillo-Mateos, Grieve, Oliviero and Cudeiro. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Arias, Pablo Robles-García, Verónica Corral-Bergantiños, Yoanna Espinosa, Nelson Mordillo-Mateos, Laura Grieve, Kenneth Oliviero, Antonio Cudeiro, Javier Balancing the excitability of M1 circuitry during movement observation without overt replication |
title | Balancing the excitability of M1 circuitry during movement observation without overt replication |
title_full | Balancing the excitability of M1 circuitry during movement observation without overt replication |
title_fullStr | Balancing the excitability of M1 circuitry during movement observation without overt replication |
title_full_unstemmed | Balancing the excitability of M1 circuitry during movement observation without overt replication |
title_short | Balancing the excitability of M1 circuitry during movement observation without overt replication |
title_sort | balancing the excitability of m1 circuitry during movement observation without overt replication |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4166319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25278854 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00316 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ariaspablo balancingtheexcitabilityofm1circuitryduringmovementobservationwithoutovertreplication AT roblesgarciaveronica balancingtheexcitabilityofm1circuitryduringmovementobservationwithoutovertreplication AT corralbergantinosyoanna balancingtheexcitabilityofm1circuitryduringmovementobservationwithoutovertreplication AT espinosanelson balancingtheexcitabilityofm1circuitryduringmovementobservationwithoutovertreplication AT mordillomateoslaura balancingtheexcitabilityofm1circuitryduringmovementobservationwithoutovertreplication AT grievekenneth balancingtheexcitabilityofm1circuitryduringmovementobservationwithoutovertreplication AT olivieroantonio balancingtheexcitabilityofm1circuitryduringmovementobservationwithoutovertreplication AT cudeirojavier balancingtheexcitabilityofm1circuitryduringmovementobservationwithoutovertreplication |