Cargando…

Balancing the excitability of M1 circuitry during movement observation without overt replication

Although observation of a movement increases the excitability of the motor system of the observer, it does not induce a motor replica. What is the mechanism for replica suppression? We performed a series of experiments, involving a total of 66 healthy humans, to explore the excitability of different...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arias, Pablo, Robles-García, Verónica, Corral-Bergantiños, Yoanna, Espinosa, Nelson, Mordillo-Mateos, Laura, Grieve, Kenneth, Oliviero, Antonio, Cudeiro, Javier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4166319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25278854
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00316
_version_ 1782335244863537152
author Arias, Pablo
Robles-García, Verónica
Corral-Bergantiños, Yoanna
Espinosa, Nelson
Mordillo-Mateos, Laura
Grieve, Kenneth
Oliviero, Antonio
Cudeiro, Javier
author_facet Arias, Pablo
Robles-García, Verónica
Corral-Bergantiños, Yoanna
Espinosa, Nelson
Mordillo-Mateos, Laura
Grieve, Kenneth
Oliviero, Antonio
Cudeiro, Javier
author_sort Arias, Pablo
collection PubMed
description Although observation of a movement increases the excitability of the motor system of the observer, it does not induce a motor replica. What is the mechanism for replica suppression? We performed a series of experiments, involving a total of 66 healthy humans, to explore the excitability of different M1 circuits and the spinal cord during observation of simple movements. Several strategies were used. In the first and second experimental blocks, we used several delay times from movement onset to evaluate the time-course modulation of the cortico-spinal excitability (CSE), and its potential dependency on the duration of the movement observed; in order to do this single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over M1 was used. In subsequent experiments, at selected delay times from movement-onset, we probed the excitability of the cortico-spinal circuits using three different approaches: (i) electric cervicomedullary stimulation (CMS), to test spinal excitability, (ii) paired-pulse TMS over M1, to evaluate the cortical inhibitory-excitatory balance (short intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF)], and (iii) continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS), to modulate the excitability of M1 cortical circuits. We observed a stereotyped response in the modulation of CSE. At 500 ms after movement-onset the ICF was increased; although the most clear-cut effect was a decrease of CSE. The compensatory mechanism was not explained by changes in SICI, but by M1-intracortical circuits targeted by cTBS. Meanwhile, the spinal cord maintained the elevated level of excitability induced when expecting to observe movements, potentially useful to facilitate any required response to the movement observed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4166319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41663192014-10-02 Balancing the excitability of M1 circuitry during movement observation without overt replication Arias, Pablo Robles-García, Verónica Corral-Bergantiños, Yoanna Espinosa, Nelson Mordillo-Mateos, Laura Grieve, Kenneth Oliviero, Antonio Cudeiro, Javier Front Behav Neurosci Neuroscience Although observation of a movement increases the excitability of the motor system of the observer, it does not induce a motor replica. What is the mechanism for replica suppression? We performed a series of experiments, involving a total of 66 healthy humans, to explore the excitability of different M1 circuits and the spinal cord during observation of simple movements. Several strategies were used. In the first and second experimental blocks, we used several delay times from movement onset to evaluate the time-course modulation of the cortico-spinal excitability (CSE), and its potential dependency on the duration of the movement observed; in order to do this single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over M1 was used. In subsequent experiments, at selected delay times from movement-onset, we probed the excitability of the cortico-spinal circuits using three different approaches: (i) electric cervicomedullary stimulation (CMS), to test spinal excitability, (ii) paired-pulse TMS over M1, to evaluate the cortical inhibitory-excitatory balance (short intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF)], and (iii) continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS), to modulate the excitability of M1 cortical circuits. We observed a stereotyped response in the modulation of CSE. At 500 ms after movement-onset the ICF was increased; although the most clear-cut effect was a decrease of CSE. The compensatory mechanism was not explained by changes in SICI, but by M1-intracortical circuits targeted by cTBS. Meanwhile, the spinal cord maintained the elevated level of excitability induced when expecting to observe movements, potentially useful to facilitate any required response to the movement observed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4166319/ /pubmed/25278854 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00316 Text en Copyright © 2014 Arias, Robles-García, Corral-Bergantiños, Espinosa, Mordillo-Mateos, Grieve, Oliviero and Cudeiro. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Arias, Pablo
Robles-García, Verónica
Corral-Bergantiños, Yoanna
Espinosa, Nelson
Mordillo-Mateos, Laura
Grieve, Kenneth
Oliviero, Antonio
Cudeiro, Javier
Balancing the excitability of M1 circuitry during movement observation without overt replication
title Balancing the excitability of M1 circuitry during movement observation without overt replication
title_full Balancing the excitability of M1 circuitry during movement observation without overt replication
title_fullStr Balancing the excitability of M1 circuitry during movement observation without overt replication
title_full_unstemmed Balancing the excitability of M1 circuitry during movement observation without overt replication
title_short Balancing the excitability of M1 circuitry during movement observation without overt replication
title_sort balancing the excitability of m1 circuitry during movement observation without overt replication
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4166319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25278854
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00316
work_keys_str_mv AT ariaspablo balancingtheexcitabilityofm1circuitryduringmovementobservationwithoutovertreplication
AT roblesgarciaveronica balancingtheexcitabilityofm1circuitryduringmovementobservationwithoutovertreplication
AT corralbergantinosyoanna balancingtheexcitabilityofm1circuitryduringmovementobservationwithoutovertreplication
AT espinosanelson balancingtheexcitabilityofm1circuitryduringmovementobservationwithoutovertreplication
AT mordillomateoslaura balancingtheexcitabilityofm1circuitryduringmovementobservationwithoutovertreplication
AT grievekenneth balancingtheexcitabilityofm1circuitryduringmovementobservationwithoutovertreplication
AT olivieroantonio balancingtheexcitabilityofm1circuitryduringmovementobservationwithoutovertreplication
AT cudeirojavier balancingtheexcitabilityofm1circuitryduringmovementobservationwithoutovertreplication