Cargando…
Differences in risk-factor profiles between patients with ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: a multicentre case-case comparison study
BACKGROUND: Generic epidemiological differences between extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-KP), are poorly defined. Nonetheless, defining such differences and understanding their basis could have strategic implications for inf...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4166396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25237477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-3-27 |
_version_ | 1782335264700497920 |
---|---|
author | Freeman, Joshua T Rubin, Joseph McAuliffe, Gary N Peirano, Gisele Roberts, Sally A Drinković, Dragana Pitout, Johann DD |
author_facet | Freeman, Joshua T Rubin, Joseph McAuliffe, Gary N Peirano, Gisele Roberts, Sally A Drinković, Dragana Pitout, Johann DD |
author_sort | Freeman, Joshua T |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Generic epidemiological differences between extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-KP), are poorly defined. Nonetheless, defining such differences and understanding their basis could have strategic implications for infection control policy and practice. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2011 patients with bacteraemia due to ESBL-EC or ESBL-KP across all three acute hospitals in the city of Auckland, New Zealand, were eligible for inclusion. Recognised risk factors for ESBL bacteraemia were compared between species in a retrospective case-case study design using multivariate logistic regression. Representative isolates underwent ESBL gene characterisation and molecular typing. RESULTS: 170 patients and 176 isolates were included in the study (92 patients with ESBL-EC, 78 with ESBL-KP). 92.6% had CTX-Ms. 39% of EC were ST131 while 51% of KP belonged to 3 different STs (i.e. ST20, ST48 & ST1087). Specific sequence types were associated with specific hospitals for ESBL-KP but not ESBL-EC. Variables positively associated with ESBL-EC on multivariate analysis were: community acquired infection (odds ratio [OR] 7.9; 95% CI: 2.6-23.9); chronic pulmonary disease (OR 5.5; 95% CI: 1.5-20.1); and high prevalence country of origin (OR 4.3; 95% CI: 1.6-11.6). Variables negatively associated with ESBL-EC were previous transplant (OR 0.06; 95% CI: 0.007-0.6); Hospital 2 (OR 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1-0.7) and recent ICU admission (OR 0.3; 95% CI: 0.07-0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Differences in risk profiles between patients with ESBL-EC and ESBL-KP suggest fundamental differences in transmission dynamics. Understanding the biological basis for these differences could have implications for infection control practice. Tailoring of infection control measures according to ESBL species may be indicated in some instances. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4166396 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41663962014-09-19 Differences in risk-factor profiles between patients with ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: a multicentre case-case comparison study Freeman, Joshua T Rubin, Joseph McAuliffe, Gary N Peirano, Gisele Roberts, Sally A Drinković, Dragana Pitout, Johann DD Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: Generic epidemiological differences between extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-KP), are poorly defined. Nonetheless, defining such differences and understanding their basis could have strategic implications for infection control policy and practice. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2011 patients with bacteraemia due to ESBL-EC or ESBL-KP across all three acute hospitals in the city of Auckland, New Zealand, were eligible for inclusion. Recognised risk factors for ESBL bacteraemia were compared between species in a retrospective case-case study design using multivariate logistic regression. Representative isolates underwent ESBL gene characterisation and molecular typing. RESULTS: 170 patients and 176 isolates were included in the study (92 patients with ESBL-EC, 78 with ESBL-KP). 92.6% had CTX-Ms. 39% of EC were ST131 while 51% of KP belonged to 3 different STs (i.e. ST20, ST48 & ST1087). Specific sequence types were associated with specific hospitals for ESBL-KP but not ESBL-EC. Variables positively associated with ESBL-EC on multivariate analysis were: community acquired infection (odds ratio [OR] 7.9; 95% CI: 2.6-23.9); chronic pulmonary disease (OR 5.5; 95% CI: 1.5-20.1); and high prevalence country of origin (OR 4.3; 95% CI: 1.6-11.6). Variables negatively associated with ESBL-EC were previous transplant (OR 0.06; 95% CI: 0.007-0.6); Hospital 2 (OR 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1-0.7) and recent ICU admission (OR 0.3; 95% CI: 0.07-0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Differences in risk profiles between patients with ESBL-EC and ESBL-KP suggest fundamental differences in transmission dynamics. Understanding the biological basis for these differences could have implications for infection control practice. Tailoring of infection control measures according to ESBL species may be indicated in some instances. BioMed Central 2014-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4166396/ /pubmed/25237477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-3-27 Text en Copyright © 2014 Freeman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Freeman, Joshua T Rubin, Joseph McAuliffe, Gary N Peirano, Gisele Roberts, Sally A Drinković, Dragana Pitout, Johann DD Differences in risk-factor profiles between patients with ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: a multicentre case-case comparison study |
title | Differences in risk-factor profiles between patients with ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: a multicentre case-case comparison study |
title_full | Differences in risk-factor profiles between patients with ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: a multicentre case-case comparison study |
title_fullStr | Differences in risk-factor profiles between patients with ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: a multicentre case-case comparison study |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in risk-factor profiles between patients with ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: a multicentre case-case comparison study |
title_short | Differences in risk-factor profiles between patients with ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: a multicentre case-case comparison study |
title_sort | differences in risk-factor profiles between patients with esbl-producing escherichia coli and klebsiella pneumoniae: a multicentre case-case comparison study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4166396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25237477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-3-27 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT freemanjoshuat differencesinriskfactorprofilesbetweenpatientswithesblproducingescherichiacoliandklebsiellapneumoniaeamulticentrecasecasecomparisonstudy AT rubinjoseph differencesinriskfactorprofilesbetweenpatientswithesblproducingescherichiacoliandklebsiellapneumoniaeamulticentrecasecasecomparisonstudy AT mcauliffegaryn differencesinriskfactorprofilesbetweenpatientswithesblproducingescherichiacoliandklebsiellapneumoniaeamulticentrecasecasecomparisonstudy AT peiranogisele differencesinriskfactorprofilesbetweenpatientswithesblproducingescherichiacoliandklebsiellapneumoniaeamulticentrecasecasecomparisonstudy AT robertssallya differencesinriskfactorprofilesbetweenpatientswithesblproducingescherichiacoliandklebsiellapneumoniaeamulticentrecasecasecomparisonstudy AT drinkovicdragana differencesinriskfactorprofilesbetweenpatientswithesblproducingescherichiacoliandklebsiellapneumoniaeamulticentrecasecasecomparisonstudy AT pitoutjohanndd differencesinriskfactorprofilesbetweenpatientswithesblproducingescherichiacoliandklebsiellapneumoniaeamulticentrecasecasecomparisonstudy |