Cargando…

Can AMSTAR also be applied to systematic reviews of non-randomized studies?

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of an instrument to evaluate systematic reviews of non-randomized studies in epidemiological research. The Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) is widely used to evaluate the scientific quality of systematic reviews, but it has not been validated for SRs of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Pieper, Dawid, Mathes, Tim, Eikermann, Michaela
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2014
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4167129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25193554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-609

Ejemplares similares

Improving the adherence of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with pharmacy care: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
por: Antoine, Sunya-Lee, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR
por: Dosenovic, Svjetlana, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

How is AMSTAR applied by authors – a call for better reporting
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

User experience of applying AMSTAR 2 to appraise systematic reviews of healthcare interventions: a commentary
por: De Santis, Karina Karolina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Resuming the discussion of AMSTAR: What can (should) be made better?
por: Wegewitz, Uta, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Inter-rater reliability of AMSTAR is dependent on the pair of reviewers
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Evaluation of the reliability, usability, and applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: protocol for a descriptive analytic study
por: Gates, Allison, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

50% adherence of patients suffering chronic conditions – where is the evidence?
por: Mathes, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Measuring test-retest reliability (TRR) of AMSTAR provides moderate to perfect agreement – a contribution to the discussion of the importance of TRR in relation to the psychometric properties of assessment tools
por: Bühn, Stefanie, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

An algorithm for the classification of study designs to assess diagnostic, prognostic and predictive test accuracy in systematic reviews
por: Mathes, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Clarifying the distinction between case series and cohort studies in systematic reviews of comparative studies: potential impact on body of evidence and workload
por: Mathes, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Adherence influencing factors – a systematic review of systematic reviews
por: Mathes, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The methodological quality of systematic reviews on the treatment of adult major depression needs improvement according to AMSTAR 2: A cross-sectional study
por: Matthias, Katja, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes: a systematic review of systematic reviews
por: Morche, Johannes, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)
por: Shea, Beverley J., et al.
Publicado: (2007)

A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization in Norwood procedure
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

A systematic review of the impact of center volume in dialysis
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Factors influencing adherence in Hepatitis-C infected patients: a systematic review
por: Mathes, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

A Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-Analysis Studies in Dance Therapy Using AMSTAR and AMSTAR 2
por: Kim, Hye-Ryeon, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

An AMSTAR assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of oral healthcare interventions published in the Journal of Applied Oral Science (JAOS)
por: SEQUEIRA-BYRON, Patrick, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews
por: Kang, Deying, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Assessing transferability in systematic reviews of health economic evaluations – a review of methodological guidance
por: Weise, Alina, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Studies analysing the need for health-related information in Germany - a systematic review
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Similarities, reliability and gaps in assessing the quality of conduct of systematic reviews using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS: systematic survey of nutrition reviews
por: Swierz, Mateusz J., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Use of AMSTAR-2 in the methodological assessment of systematic reviews: protocol for a methodological study
por: Lu, Cuncun, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
por: Shea, Beverley J, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Limitations of A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and suggestions for improvement
por: Burda, Brittany U., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
por: Pollock, Michelle, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

A descriptive analysis of the characteristics and the peer review process of systematic review protocols published in an open peer review journal from 2012 to 2017
por: Rombey, Tanja, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Restrictions and their reporting in systematic reviews of effectiveness: an observational study
por: Helbach, Jasmin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Frequency of data extraction errors and methods to increase data extraction quality: a methodological review
por: Mathes, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Critical appraisal of systematic reviews of intervention studies in periodontology using AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tools
por: Pereira, Alexandre-Godinho, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Abstract: Assessing Quality in Systematic Reviews: Application of AMSTAR Criteria to Plastic Surgery Literature
por: Jenny, Hillary E., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Quality assessment of systematic reviews on total hip or knee arthroplasty using mod-AMSTAR
por: Wu, Xinyu, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Evaluating the Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses About Breast Augmentation Using AMSTAR
por: Yuan, Morgan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Interventions to increase adherence in patients taking immunosuppressive drugs after kidney transplantation: a systematic review of controlled trials
por: Mathes, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Evaluating Breast Reconstruction Reviews Using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)
por: Yuan, Morgan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Hospital volume-outcome relationship in total knee arthroplasty: protocol for a systematic review and non-linear dose-response meta-analysis
por: Rombey, Tanja, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
por: Shea, Beverley J, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

157: ASSESSING THE METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY OF DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM (DSS) SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS BY AMSTAR CHECKLIST
por: Sadeghi-Ghyassi, Fatemeh, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_pdjjltq895iff9a77c0roj0c2o