Cargando…

Effectiveness of peer-delivered interventions for severe mental illness and depression on clinical and psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of peer-delivered interventions in improving clinical and psychosocial outcomes among individuals with severe mental illness (SMI) or depression. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing a peer-delivered interventio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fuhr, Daniela C., Salisbury, Tatiana Taylor, De Silva, Mary J., Atif, Najia, van Ginneken, Nadja, Rahman, Atif, Patel, Vikram
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4167169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24632847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-014-0857-5
_version_ 1782335379005767680
author Fuhr, Daniela C.
Salisbury, Tatiana Taylor
De Silva, Mary J.
Atif, Najia
van Ginneken, Nadja
Rahman, Atif
Patel, Vikram
author_facet Fuhr, Daniela C.
Salisbury, Tatiana Taylor
De Silva, Mary J.
Atif, Najia
van Ginneken, Nadja
Rahman, Atif
Patel, Vikram
author_sort Fuhr, Daniela C.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of peer-delivered interventions in improving clinical and psychosocial outcomes among individuals with severe mental illness (SMI) or depression. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing a peer-delivered intervention to treatment as usual or treatment delivered by a health professional. Random effect meta-analyses were performed separately for SMI and depression interventions. RESULTS: Fourteen studies (10 SMI studies, 4 depression studies), all from high-income countries, met the inclusion criteria. For SMI, evidence from three high-quality superiority trials showed small positive effects favouring peer-delivered interventions for quality of life (SMD 0.24, 95 % CI 0.08–0.40, p = 0.003, I(2) = 0 %, n = 639) and hope (SMD 0.24, 95 % CI 0.02–0.46, p = 0.03, I(2) = 65 %, n = 967). Results of two SMI equivalence trials indicated that peers may be equivalent to health professionals in improving clinical symptoms (SMD −0.14, 95 % CI −0.57 to 0.29, p = 0.51, I(2) = 0 %, n = 84) and quality of life (SMD −0.11, 95 % CI −0.42 to 0.20, p = 0.56, I(2) = 0 %, n = 164). No effect of peer-delivered interventions for depression was observed on any outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The limited evidence base suggests that peers may have a small additional impact on patient’s outcomes, in comparison to standard psychiatric care in high-income settings. Future research should explore the use and applicability of peer-delivered interventions in resource poor settings where standard care is likely to be of lower quality and coverage. The positive findings of equivalence trials demand further research in this area to consolidate the relative value of peer-delivered vs. professional-delivered interventions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00127-014-0857-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4167169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41671692015-01-23 Effectiveness of peer-delivered interventions for severe mental illness and depression on clinical and psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis Fuhr, Daniela C. Salisbury, Tatiana Taylor De Silva, Mary J. Atif, Najia van Ginneken, Nadja Rahman, Atif Patel, Vikram Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Invited Reviews PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of peer-delivered interventions in improving clinical and psychosocial outcomes among individuals with severe mental illness (SMI) or depression. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing a peer-delivered intervention to treatment as usual or treatment delivered by a health professional. Random effect meta-analyses were performed separately for SMI and depression interventions. RESULTS: Fourteen studies (10 SMI studies, 4 depression studies), all from high-income countries, met the inclusion criteria. For SMI, evidence from three high-quality superiority trials showed small positive effects favouring peer-delivered interventions for quality of life (SMD 0.24, 95 % CI 0.08–0.40, p = 0.003, I(2) = 0 %, n = 639) and hope (SMD 0.24, 95 % CI 0.02–0.46, p = 0.03, I(2) = 65 %, n = 967). Results of two SMI equivalence trials indicated that peers may be equivalent to health professionals in improving clinical symptoms (SMD −0.14, 95 % CI −0.57 to 0.29, p = 0.51, I(2) = 0 %, n = 84) and quality of life (SMD −0.11, 95 % CI −0.42 to 0.20, p = 0.56, I(2) = 0 %, n = 164). No effect of peer-delivered interventions for depression was observed on any outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The limited evidence base suggests that peers may have a small additional impact on patient’s outcomes, in comparison to standard psychiatric care in high-income settings. Future research should explore the use and applicability of peer-delivered interventions in resource poor settings where standard care is likely to be of lower quality and coverage. The positive findings of equivalence trials demand further research in this area to consolidate the relative value of peer-delivered vs. professional-delivered interventions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00127-014-0857-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014-03-17 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4167169/ /pubmed/24632847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-014-0857-5 Text en © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014
spellingShingle Invited Reviews
Fuhr, Daniela C.
Salisbury, Tatiana Taylor
De Silva, Mary J.
Atif, Najia
van Ginneken, Nadja
Rahman, Atif
Patel, Vikram
Effectiveness of peer-delivered interventions for severe mental illness and depression on clinical and psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Effectiveness of peer-delivered interventions for severe mental illness and depression on clinical and psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Effectiveness of peer-delivered interventions for severe mental illness and depression on clinical and psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effectiveness of peer-delivered interventions for severe mental illness and depression on clinical and psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of peer-delivered interventions for severe mental illness and depression on clinical and psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Effectiveness of peer-delivered interventions for severe mental illness and depression on clinical and psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effectiveness of peer-delivered interventions for severe mental illness and depression on clinical and psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Invited Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4167169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24632847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-014-0857-5
work_keys_str_mv AT fuhrdanielac effectivenessofpeerdeliveredinterventionsforseverementalillnessanddepressiononclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT salisburytatianataylor effectivenessofpeerdeliveredinterventionsforseverementalillnessanddepressiononclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT desilvamaryj effectivenessofpeerdeliveredinterventionsforseverementalillnessanddepressiononclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT atifnajia effectivenessofpeerdeliveredinterventionsforseverementalillnessanddepressiononclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vanginnekennadja effectivenessofpeerdeliveredinterventionsforseverementalillnessanddepressiononclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rahmanatif effectivenessofpeerdeliveredinterventionsforseverementalillnessanddepressiononclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT patelvikram effectivenessofpeerdeliveredinterventionsforseverementalillnessanddepressiononclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis