Cargando…
Effectiveness of peer-delivered interventions for severe mental illness and depression on clinical and psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of peer-delivered interventions in improving clinical and psychosocial outcomes among individuals with severe mental illness (SMI) or depression. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing a peer-delivered interventio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4167169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24632847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-014-0857-5 |
_version_ | 1782335379005767680 |
---|---|
author | Fuhr, Daniela C. Salisbury, Tatiana Taylor De Silva, Mary J. Atif, Najia van Ginneken, Nadja Rahman, Atif Patel, Vikram |
author_facet | Fuhr, Daniela C. Salisbury, Tatiana Taylor De Silva, Mary J. Atif, Najia van Ginneken, Nadja Rahman, Atif Patel, Vikram |
author_sort | Fuhr, Daniela C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of peer-delivered interventions in improving clinical and psychosocial outcomes among individuals with severe mental illness (SMI) or depression. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing a peer-delivered intervention to treatment as usual or treatment delivered by a health professional. Random effect meta-analyses were performed separately for SMI and depression interventions. RESULTS: Fourteen studies (10 SMI studies, 4 depression studies), all from high-income countries, met the inclusion criteria. For SMI, evidence from three high-quality superiority trials showed small positive effects favouring peer-delivered interventions for quality of life (SMD 0.24, 95 % CI 0.08–0.40, p = 0.003, I(2) = 0 %, n = 639) and hope (SMD 0.24, 95 % CI 0.02–0.46, p = 0.03, I(2) = 65 %, n = 967). Results of two SMI equivalence trials indicated that peers may be equivalent to health professionals in improving clinical symptoms (SMD −0.14, 95 % CI −0.57 to 0.29, p = 0.51, I(2) = 0 %, n = 84) and quality of life (SMD −0.11, 95 % CI −0.42 to 0.20, p = 0.56, I(2) = 0 %, n = 164). No effect of peer-delivered interventions for depression was observed on any outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The limited evidence base suggests that peers may have a small additional impact on patient’s outcomes, in comparison to standard psychiatric care in high-income settings. Future research should explore the use and applicability of peer-delivered interventions in resource poor settings where standard care is likely to be of lower quality and coverage. The positive findings of equivalence trials demand further research in this area to consolidate the relative value of peer-delivered vs. professional-delivered interventions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00127-014-0857-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4167169 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41671692015-01-23 Effectiveness of peer-delivered interventions for severe mental illness and depression on clinical and psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis Fuhr, Daniela C. Salisbury, Tatiana Taylor De Silva, Mary J. Atif, Najia van Ginneken, Nadja Rahman, Atif Patel, Vikram Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Invited Reviews PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of peer-delivered interventions in improving clinical and psychosocial outcomes among individuals with severe mental illness (SMI) or depression. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing a peer-delivered intervention to treatment as usual or treatment delivered by a health professional. Random effect meta-analyses were performed separately for SMI and depression interventions. RESULTS: Fourteen studies (10 SMI studies, 4 depression studies), all from high-income countries, met the inclusion criteria. For SMI, evidence from three high-quality superiority trials showed small positive effects favouring peer-delivered interventions for quality of life (SMD 0.24, 95 % CI 0.08–0.40, p = 0.003, I(2) = 0 %, n = 639) and hope (SMD 0.24, 95 % CI 0.02–0.46, p = 0.03, I(2) = 65 %, n = 967). Results of two SMI equivalence trials indicated that peers may be equivalent to health professionals in improving clinical symptoms (SMD −0.14, 95 % CI −0.57 to 0.29, p = 0.51, I(2) = 0 %, n = 84) and quality of life (SMD −0.11, 95 % CI −0.42 to 0.20, p = 0.56, I(2) = 0 %, n = 164). No effect of peer-delivered interventions for depression was observed on any outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The limited evidence base suggests that peers may have a small additional impact on patient’s outcomes, in comparison to standard psychiatric care in high-income settings. Future research should explore the use and applicability of peer-delivered interventions in resource poor settings where standard care is likely to be of lower quality and coverage. The positive findings of equivalence trials demand further research in this area to consolidate the relative value of peer-delivered vs. professional-delivered interventions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00127-014-0857-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014-03-17 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4167169/ /pubmed/24632847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-014-0857-5 Text en © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014 |
spellingShingle | Invited Reviews Fuhr, Daniela C. Salisbury, Tatiana Taylor De Silva, Mary J. Atif, Najia van Ginneken, Nadja Rahman, Atif Patel, Vikram Effectiveness of peer-delivered interventions for severe mental illness and depression on clinical and psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Effectiveness of peer-delivered interventions for severe mental illness and depression on clinical and psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Effectiveness of peer-delivered interventions for severe mental illness and depression on clinical and psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of peer-delivered interventions for severe mental illness and depression on clinical and psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of peer-delivered interventions for severe mental illness and depression on clinical and psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Effectiveness of peer-delivered interventions for severe mental illness and depression on clinical and psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | effectiveness of peer-delivered interventions for severe mental illness and depression on clinical and psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Invited Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4167169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24632847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-014-0857-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fuhrdanielac effectivenessofpeerdeliveredinterventionsforseverementalillnessanddepressiononclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT salisburytatianataylor effectivenessofpeerdeliveredinterventionsforseverementalillnessanddepressiononclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT desilvamaryj effectivenessofpeerdeliveredinterventionsforseverementalillnessanddepressiononclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT atifnajia effectivenessofpeerdeliveredinterventionsforseverementalillnessanddepressiononclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vanginnekennadja effectivenessofpeerdeliveredinterventionsforseverementalillnessanddepressiononclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rahmanatif effectivenessofpeerdeliveredinterventionsforseverementalillnessanddepressiononclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT patelvikram effectivenessofpeerdeliveredinterventionsforseverementalillnessanddepressiononclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |