Cargando…

Using mixed methods to evaluate efficacy and user expectations of a virtual reality–based training system for upper-limb recovery in patients after stroke: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: In recent years, virtual reality has been introduced to neurorehabilitation, in particular with the intention of improving upper-limb training options and facilitating motor function recovery. METHODS/DESIGN: The proposed study incorporates a quantitative part and a qualitative part, ter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schuster-Amft, Corina, Eng, Kynan, Lehmann, Isabelle, Schmid, Ludwig, Kobashi, Nagisa, Thaler, Irène, Verra, Martin L, Henneke, Andrea, Signer, Sandra, McCaskey, Michael, Kiper, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4167274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25194928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-350
_version_ 1782335403397742592
author Schuster-Amft, Corina
Eng, Kynan
Lehmann, Isabelle
Schmid, Ludwig
Kobashi, Nagisa
Thaler, Irène
Verra, Martin L
Henneke, Andrea
Signer, Sandra
McCaskey, Michael
Kiper, Daniel
author_facet Schuster-Amft, Corina
Eng, Kynan
Lehmann, Isabelle
Schmid, Ludwig
Kobashi, Nagisa
Thaler, Irène
Verra, Martin L
Henneke, Andrea
Signer, Sandra
McCaskey, Michael
Kiper, Daniel
author_sort Schuster-Amft, Corina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In recent years, virtual reality has been introduced to neurorehabilitation, in particular with the intention of improving upper-limb training options and facilitating motor function recovery. METHODS/DESIGN: The proposed study incorporates a quantitative part and a qualitative part, termed a mixed-methods approach: (1) a quantitative investigation of the efficacy of virtual reality training compared to conventional therapy in upper-limb motor function are investigated, (2a) a qualitative investigation of patients’ experiences and expectations of virtual reality training and (2b) a qualitative investigation of therapists’ experiences using the virtual reality training system in the therapy setting. At three participating clinics, 60 patients at least 6 months after stroke onset will be randomly allocated to an experimental virtual reality group (EG) or to a control group that will receive conventional physiotherapy or occupational therapy (16 sessions, 45 minutes each, over the course of 4 weeks). Using custom data gloves, patients’ finger and arm movements will be displayed in real time on a monitor, and they will move and manipulate objects in various virtual environments. A blinded assessor will test patients’ motor and cognitive performance twice before, once during, and twice after the 4-week intervention. The primary outcome measure is the Box and Block Test. Secondary outcome measures are the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessments (hand, arm and shoulder pain subscales), the Chedoke-McMaster Arm and Hand Activity Inventory, the Line Bisection Test, the Stroke Impact Scale, the MiniMentalState Examination and the Extended Barthel Index. Semistructured face-to-face interviews will be conducted with patients in the EG after intervention finalization with a focus on the patients’ expectations and experiences regarding the virtual reality training. Therapists’ perspectives on virtual reality training will be reviewed in three focus groups comprising four to six occupational therapists and physiotherapists. DISCUSSION: The interviews will help to gain a deeper understanding of the phenomena under investigation to provide sound recommendations for the implementation of the virtual reality training system for routine use in neurorehabilitation complementing the quantitative clinical assessments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Cliniclatrials.gov Identifier: NCT01774669 (15 January 2013) ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-350) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4167274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41672742014-09-19 Using mixed methods to evaluate efficacy and user expectations of a virtual reality–based training system for upper-limb recovery in patients after stroke: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Schuster-Amft, Corina Eng, Kynan Lehmann, Isabelle Schmid, Ludwig Kobashi, Nagisa Thaler, Irène Verra, Martin L Henneke, Andrea Signer, Sandra McCaskey, Michael Kiper, Daniel Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In recent years, virtual reality has been introduced to neurorehabilitation, in particular with the intention of improving upper-limb training options and facilitating motor function recovery. METHODS/DESIGN: The proposed study incorporates a quantitative part and a qualitative part, termed a mixed-methods approach: (1) a quantitative investigation of the efficacy of virtual reality training compared to conventional therapy in upper-limb motor function are investigated, (2a) a qualitative investigation of patients’ experiences and expectations of virtual reality training and (2b) a qualitative investigation of therapists’ experiences using the virtual reality training system in the therapy setting. At three participating clinics, 60 patients at least 6 months after stroke onset will be randomly allocated to an experimental virtual reality group (EG) or to a control group that will receive conventional physiotherapy or occupational therapy (16 sessions, 45 minutes each, over the course of 4 weeks). Using custom data gloves, patients’ finger and arm movements will be displayed in real time on a monitor, and they will move and manipulate objects in various virtual environments. A blinded assessor will test patients’ motor and cognitive performance twice before, once during, and twice after the 4-week intervention. The primary outcome measure is the Box and Block Test. Secondary outcome measures are the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessments (hand, arm and shoulder pain subscales), the Chedoke-McMaster Arm and Hand Activity Inventory, the Line Bisection Test, the Stroke Impact Scale, the MiniMentalState Examination and the Extended Barthel Index. Semistructured face-to-face interviews will be conducted with patients in the EG after intervention finalization with a focus on the patients’ expectations and experiences regarding the virtual reality training. Therapists’ perspectives on virtual reality training will be reviewed in three focus groups comprising four to six occupational therapists and physiotherapists. DISCUSSION: The interviews will help to gain a deeper understanding of the phenomena under investigation to provide sound recommendations for the implementation of the virtual reality training system for routine use in neurorehabilitation complementing the quantitative clinical assessments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Cliniclatrials.gov Identifier: NCT01774669 (15 January 2013) ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-350) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4167274/ /pubmed/25194928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-350 Text en © Schuster-Amft et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Schuster-Amft, Corina
Eng, Kynan
Lehmann, Isabelle
Schmid, Ludwig
Kobashi, Nagisa
Thaler, Irène
Verra, Martin L
Henneke, Andrea
Signer, Sandra
McCaskey, Michael
Kiper, Daniel
Using mixed methods to evaluate efficacy and user expectations of a virtual reality–based training system for upper-limb recovery in patients after stroke: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title Using mixed methods to evaluate efficacy and user expectations of a virtual reality–based training system for upper-limb recovery in patients after stroke: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full Using mixed methods to evaluate efficacy and user expectations of a virtual reality–based training system for upper-limb recovery in patients after stroke: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Using mixed methods to evaluate efficacy and user expectations of a virtual reality–based training system for upper-limb recovery in patients after stroke: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Using mixed methods to evaluate efficacy and user expectations of a virtual reality–based training system for upper-limb recovery in patients after stroke: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short Using mixed methods to evaluate efficacy and user expectations of a virtual reality–based training system for upper-limb recovery in patients after stroke: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort using mixed methods to evaluate efficacy and user expectations of a virtual reality–based training system for upper-limb recovery in patients after stroke: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4167274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25194928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-350
work_keys_str_mv AT schusteramftcorina usingmixedmethodstoevaluateefficacyanduserexpectationsofavirtualrealitybasedtrainingsystemforupperlimbrecoveryinpatientsafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT engkynan usingmixedmethodstoevaluateefficacyanduserexpectationsofavirtualrealitybasedtrainingsystemforupperlimbrecoveryinpatientsafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lehmannisabelle usingmixedmethodstoevaluateefficacyanduserexpectationsofavirtualrealitybasedtrainingsystemforupperlimbrecoveryinpatientsafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schmidludwig usingmixedmethodstoevaluateefficacyanduserexpectationsofavirtualrealitybasedtrainingsystemforupperlimbrecoveryinpatientsafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kobashinagisa usingmixedmethodstoevaluateefficacyanduserexpectationsofavirtualrealitybasedtrainingsystemforupperlimbrecoveryinpatientsafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT thalerirene usingmixedmethodstoevaluateefficacyanduserexpectationsofavirtualrealitybasedtrainingsystemforupperlimbrecoveryinpatientsafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT verramartinl usingmixedmethodstoevaluateefficacyanduserexpectationsofavirtualrealitybasedtrainingsystemforupperlimbrecoveryinpatientsafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hennekeandrea usingmixedmethodstoevaluateefficacyanduserexpectationsofavirtualrealitybasedtrainingsystemforupperlimbrecoveryinpatientsafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT signersandra usingmixedmethodstoevaluateefficacyanduserexpectationsofavirtualrealitybasedtrainingsystemforupperlimbrecoveryinpatientsafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mccaskeymichael usingmixedmethodstoevaluateefficacyanduserexpectationsofavirtualrealitybasedtrainingsystemforupperlimbrecoveryinpatientsafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kiperdaniel usingmixedmethodstoevaluateefficacyanduserexpectationsofavirtualrealitybasedtrainingsystemforupperlimbrecoveryinpatientsafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial