Cargando…
Using mixed methods to evaluate efficacy and user expectations of a virtual reality–based training system for upper-limb recovery in patients after stroke: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: In recent years, virtual reality has been introduced to neurorehabilitation, in particular with the intention of improving upper-limb training options and facilitating motor function recovery. METHODS/DESIGN: The proposed study incorporates a quantitative part and a qualitative part, ter...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4167274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25194928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-350 |
_version_ | 1782335403397742592 |
---|---|
author | Schuster-Amft, Corina Eng, Kynan Lehmann, Isabelle Schmid, Ludwig Kobashi, Nagisa Thaler, Irène Verra, Martin L Henneke, Andrea Signer, Sandra McCaskey, Michael Kiper, Daniel |
author_facet | Schuster-Amft, Corina Eng, Kynan Lehmann, Isabelle Schmid, Ludwig Kobashi, Nagisa Thaler, Irène Verra, Martin L Henneke, Andrea Signer, Sandra McCaskey, Michael Kiper, Daniel |
author_sort | Schuster-Amft, Corina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In recent years, virtual reality has been introduced to neurorehabilitation, in particular with the intention of improving upper-limb training options and facilitating motor function recovery. METHODS/DESIGN: The proposed study incorporates a quantitative part and a qualitative part, termed a mixed-methods approach: (1) a quantitative investigation of the efficacy of virtual reality training compared to conventional therapy in upper-limb motor function are investigated, (2a) a qualitative investigation of patients’ experiences and expectations of virtual reality training and (2b) a qualitative investigation of therapists’ experiences using the virtual reality training system in the therapy setting. At three participating clinics, 60 patients at least 6 months after stroke onset will be randomly allocated to an experimental virtual reality group (EG) or to a control group that will receive conventional physiotherapy or occupational therapy (16 sessions, 45 minutes each, over the course of 4 weeks). Using custom data gloves, patients’ finger and arm movements will be displayed in real time on a monitor, and they will move and manipulate objects in various virtual environments. A blinded assessor will test patients’ motor and cognitive performance twice before, once during, and twice after the 4-week intervention. The primary outcome measure is the Box and Block Test. Secondary outcome measures are the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessments (hand, arm and shoulder pain subscales), the Chedoke-McMaster Arm and Hand Activity Inventory, the Line Bisection Test, the Stroke Impact Scale, the MiniMentalState Examination and the Extended Barthel Index. Semistructured face-to-face interviews will be conducted with patients in the EG after intervention finalization with a focus on the patients’ expectations and experiences regarding the virtual reality training. Therapists’ perspectives on virtual reality training will be reviewed in three focus groups comprising four to six occupational therapists and physiotherapists. DISCUSSION: The interviews will help to gain a deeper understanding of the phenomena under investigation to provide sound recommendations for the implementation of the virtual reality training system for routine use in neurorehabilitation complementing the quantitative clinical assessments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Cliniclatrials.gov Identifier: NCT01774669 (15 January 2013) ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-350) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4167274 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41672742014-09-19 Using mixed methods to evaluate efficacy and user expectations of a virtual reality–based training system for upper-limb recovery in patients after stroke: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Schuster-Amft, Corina Eng, Kynan Lehmann, Isabelle Schmid, Ludwig Kobashi, Nagisa Thaler, Irène Verra, Martin L Henneke, Andrea Signer, Sandra McCaskey, Michael Kiper, Daniel Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In recent years, virtual reality has been introduced to neurorehabilitation, in particular with the intention of improving upper-limb training options and facilitating motor function recovery. METHODS/DESIGN: The proposed study incorporates a quantitative part and a qualitative part, termed a mixed-methods approach: (1) a quantitative investigation of the efficacy of virtual reality training compared to conventional therapy in upper-limb motor function are investigated, (2a) a qualitative investigation of patients’ experiences and expectations of virtual reality training and (2b) a qualitative investigation of therapists’ experiences using the virtual reality training system in the therapy setting. At three participating clinics, 60 patients at least 6 months after stroke onset will be randomly allocated to an experimental virtual reality group (EG) or to a control group that will receive conventional physiotherapy or occupational therapy (16 sessions, 45 minutes each, over the course of 4 weeks). Using custom data gloves, patients’ finger and arm movements will be displayed in real time on a monitor, and they will move and manipulate objects in various virtual environments. A blinded assessor will test patients’ motor and cognitive performance twice before, once during, and twice after the 4-week intervention. The primary outcome measure is the Box and Block Test. Secondary outcome measures are the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessments (hand, arm and shoulder pain subscales), the Chedoke-McMaster Arm and Hand Activity Inventory, the Line Bisection Test, the Stroke Impact Scale, the MiniMentalState Examination and the Extended Barthel Index. Semistructured face-to-face interviews will be conducted with patients in the EG after intervention finalization with a focus on the patients’ expectations and experiences regarding the virtual reality training. Therapists’ perspectives on virtual reality training will be reviewed in three focus groups comprising four to six occupational therapists and physiotherapists. DISCUSSION: The interviews will help to gain a deeper understanding of the phenomena under investigation to provide sound recommendations for the implementation of the virtual reality training system for routine use in neurorehabilitation complementing the quantitative clinical assessments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Cliniclatrials.gov Identifier: NCT01774669 (15 January 2013) ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-350) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4167274/ /pubmed/25194928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-350 Text en © Schuster-Amft et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Schuster-Amft, Corina Eng, Kynan Lehmann, Isabelle Schmid, Ludwig Kobashi, Nagisa Thaler, Irène Verra, Martin L Henneke, Andrea Signer, Sandra McCaskey, Michael Kiper, Daniel Using mixed methods to evaluate efficacy and user expectations of a virtual reality–based training system for upper-limb recovery in patients after stroke: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title | Using mixed methods to evaluate efficacy and user expectations of a virtual reality–based training system for upper-limb recovery in patients after stroke: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Using mixed methods to evaluate efficacy and user expectations of a virtual reality–based training system for upper-limb recovery in patients after stroke: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Using mixed methods to evaluate efficacy and user expectations of a virtual reality–based training system for upper-limb recovery in patients after stroke: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Using mixed methods to evaluate efficacy and user expectations of a virtual reality–based training system for upper-limb recovery in patients after stroke: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Using mixed methods to evaluate efficacy and user expectations of a virtual reality–based training system for upper-limb recovery in patients after stroke: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | using mixed methods to evaluate efficacy and user expectations of a virtual reality–based training system for upper-limb recovery in patients after stroke: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4167274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25194928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-350 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schusteramftcorina usingmixedmethodstoevaluateefficacyanduserexpectationsofavirtualrealitybasedtrainingsystemforupperlimbrecoveryinpatientsafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT engkynan usingmixedmethodstoevaluateefficacyanduserexpectationsofavirtualrealitybasedtrainingsystemforupperlimbrecoveryinpatientsafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT lehmannisabelle usingmixedmethodstoevaluateefficacyanduserexpectationsofavirtualrealitybasedtrainingsystemforupperlimbrecoveryinpatientsafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT schmidludwig usingmixedmethodstoevaluateefficacyanduserexpectationsofavirtualrealitybasedtrainingsystemforupperlimbrecoveryinpatientsafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kobashinagisa usingmixedmethodstoevaluateefficacyanduserexpectationsofavirtualrealitybasedtrainingsystemforupperlimbrecoveryinpatientsafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT thalerirene usingmixedmethodstoevaluateefficacyanduserexpectationsofavirtualrealitybasedtrainingsystemforupperlimbrecoveryinpatientsafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT verramartinl usingmixedmethodstoevaluateefficacyanduserexpectationsofavirtualrealitybasedtrainingsystemforupperlimbrecoveryinpatientsafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hennekeandrea usingmixedmethodstoevaluateefficacyanduserexpectationsofavirtualrealitybasedtrainingsystemforupperlimbrecoveryinpatientsafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT signersandra usingmixedmethodstoevaluateefficacyanduserexpectationsofavirtualrealitybasedtrainingsystemforupperlimbrecoveryinpatientsafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mccaskeymichael usingmixedmethodstoevaluateefficacyanduserexpectationsofavirtualrealitybasedtrainingsystemforupperlimbrecoveryinpatientsafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kiperdaniel usingmixedmethodstoevaluateefficacyanduserexpectationsofavirtualrealitybasedtrainingsystemforupperlimbrecoveryinpatientsafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial |