Cargando…

Distribution and utilization of vector control strategies in a malarious village of Jabi Tehnan District, north-western Ethiopia

BACKGROUND: Adequate coverage and proper use of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spaying (IRS) reduce density of indoor-resting mosquitoes, man-mosquito contact and malaria infection. However, distribution, ownership and usage of the interventions may vary among households...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Animut, Abebe, Negash, Yohannes, Kebede, Nigatu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4167497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25208550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-356
_version_ 1782335427835854848
author Animut, Abebe
Negash, Yohannes
Kebede, Nigatu
author_facet Animut, Abebe
Negash, Yohannes
Kebede, Nigatu
author_sort Animut, Abebe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adequate coverage and proper use of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spaying (IRS) reduce density of indoor-resting mosquitoes, man-mosquito contact and malaria infection. However, distribution, ownership and usage of the interventions may vary among households in a malarious area, which in turn limits the impact of interventions on the transmission of malaria. A study was undertaken to assess distribution and utilization of LLINs and IRS in a malarious village of north-western Ethiopia. METHODS: A total of 352 randomly selected households in Jiga Yelmdar village, Jabi Tehnan District of north-western Ethiopia were interviewed using a structured questionnaire. The most important questions included distribution and utilization of LLINs/IRS and knowledge by the households of malaria and the interventions. RESULTS: More than 99% of the respondents had information about malaria. About 97% of the households had at least one LLIN and 89.3% of houses had been treated with IRS within the previous six months. Only 58.2% of the LLIN-owning households had used the nets the previous night. Not being a malaria transmission season was the main reason cited by 69.7% of the households for not using their LLINs the previous night. The most preferred malaria control strategy in the village was LLINs (cited by 71.1%) followed by IRS (cited by 14.5%). About 29% of the households had a history of malaria within the previous six months and the great majority of them (86.3%) sought treatment at the Jiga Yelmdar Health Post or Jiga Health Centre. CONCLUSION: Residents of Jiga Yelmdar village were knowledgeable about malaria and the control strategies of the disease such as LLINs and IRS. Although LLIN use is their most preferred strategy, the compliance rate was low which probably contributed to the 29% of household-level malaria infection in the village within the previous six months. This indicates the need for improved compliance to LLINs and IRS in the village.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4167497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41674972014-09-19 Distribution and utilization of vector control strategies in a malarious village of Jabi Tehnan District, north-western Ethiopia Animut, Abebe Negash, Yohannes Kebede, Nigatu Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Adequate coverage and proper use of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spaying (IRS) reduce density of indoor-resting mosquitoes, man-mosquito contact and malaria infection. However, distribution, ownership and usage of the interventions may vary among households in a malarious area, which in turn limits the impact of interventions on the transmission of malaria. A study was undertaken to assess distribution and utilization of LLINs and IRS in a malarious village of north-western Ethiopia. METHODS: A total of 352 randomly selected households in Jiga Yelmdar village, Jabi Tehnan District of north-western Ethiopia were interviewed using a structured questionnaire. The most important questions included distribution and utilization of LLINs/IRS and knowledge by the households of malaria and the interventions. RESULTS: More than 99% of the respondents had information about malaria. About 97% of the households had at least one LLIN and 89.3% of houses had been treated with IRS within the previous six months. Only 58.2% of the LLIN-owning households had used the nets the previous night. Not being a malaria transmission season was the main reason cited by 69.7% of the households for not using their LLINs the previous night. The most preferred malaria control strategy in the village was LLINs (cited by 71.1%) followed by IRS (cited by 14.5%). About 29% of the households had a history of malaria within the previous six months and the great majority of them (86.3%) sought treatment at the Jiga Yelmdar Health Post or Jiga Health Centre. CONCLUSION: Residents of Jiga Yelmdar village were knowledgeable about malaria and the control strategies of the disease such as LLINs and IRS. Although LLIN use is their most preferred strategy, the compliance rate was low which probably contributed to the 29% of household-level malaria infection in the village within the previous six months. This indicates the need for improved compliance to LLINs and IRS in the village. BioMed Central 2014-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4167497/ /pubmed/25208550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-356 Text en © Animut et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Animut, Abebe
Negash, Yohannes
Kebede, Nigatu
Distribution and utilization of vector control strategies in a malarious village of Jabi Tehnan District, north-western Ethiopia
title Distribution and utilization of vector control strategies in a malarious village of Jabi Tehnan District, north-western Ethiopia
title_full Distribution and utilization of vector control strategies in a malarious village of Jabi Tehnan District, north-western Ethiopia
title_fullStr Distribution and utilization of vector control strategies in a malarious village of Jabi Tehnan District, north-western Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed Distribution and utilization of vector control strategies in a malarious village of Jabi Tehnan District, north-western Ethiopia
title_short Distribution and utilization of vector control strategies in a malarious village of Jabi Tehnan District, north-western Ethiopia
title_sort distribution and utilization of vector control strategies in a malarious village of jabi tehnan district, north-western ethiopia
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4167497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25208550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-356
work_keys_str_mv AT animutabebe distributionandutilizationofvectorcontrolstrategiesinamalariousvillageofjabitehnandistrictnorthwesternethiopia
AT negashyohannes distributionandutilizationofvectorcontrolstrategiesinamalariousvillageofjabitehnandistrictnorthwesternethiopia
AT kebedenigatu distributionandutilizationofvectorcontrolstrategiesinamalariousvillageofjabitehnandistrictnorthwesternethiopia