Cargando…

Control values of ovarian cancer tumor markers and standardisation of a protocol for sampling peritoneal fluid and performing washing during laparoscopy

BACKGROUND: Determination of the tumor marker concentration in peritoneal fluid (PF) may help to assess its potential to detect small concentration changes between benign ovarian pathology and early stage ovarian cancer. Peritoneal washing, which can also be obtained when PF is absent, is already in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jerman, Katarina Galic, Kobal, Borut, Jakimovska, Marina, Verdenik, Ivan, Cerne, Katarina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4167500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25185697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-12-278
_version_ 1782335428571955200
author Jerman, Katarina Galic
Kobal, Borut
Jakimovska, Marina
Verdenik, Ivan
Cerne, Katarina
author_facet Jerman, Katarina Galic
Kobal, Borut
Jakimovska, Marina
Verdenik, Ivan
Cerne, Katarina
author_sort Jerman, Katarina Galic
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Determination of the tumor marker concentration in peritoneal fluid (PF) may help to assess its potential to detect small concentration changes between benign ovarian pathology and early stage ovarian cancer. Peritoneal washing, which can also be obtained when PF is absent, is already included in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging classification for ovarian cancer but sampling has not yet been standardized. Since our aim was to evaluate the relationship between marker concentration in PF and washing, standardization of the sampling protocol was a prerequisite to ensure reliable results. METHODS: Thirty-three women with non-malignant pathology of the reproductive organs were included in the study. We used three promising tumor markers for evaluation of the marker concentration in local fluid: osteopontin (sOPN), splice variant 6 of sCD44 (sCD44-v6) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1). After aspiration of PF, washing of the uterus, ovaries and pelvic peritoneum was performed with saline solution. Patients were divided into two groups based on the solution volume: A-20 ml and B-50 ml. To determine the efficiency of washing in relation to solution volume, washing was repeated three times. Concentrations of markers in samples were determined using flow cytometry. RESULTS: Mean concentrations of markers were significantly higher (P <0.001) in PF than in the first washing. We demonstrated a significant positive correlation between marker concentrations in PF and first washing (sOPN: r = 0.447, P = 0.048; sCD44-v6: r = 0.660, P = 0.002; sVCAM-1: r = 0.526, P = 0.017). When using a smaller solution volume for washing, significantly higher (sVCAM-1: 2.5-fold, P = 0.021; sOPN: 3-fold, P = 0.024) or equal (sCD44-v6) mean concentrations of tumor markers were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Our work demonstrates for the first time that concentrations of sOPN, sCD44-v6 and sVCAM-1 in PF correlate with peritoneal washing in women with non-malignant pathology of the reproductive organs. This indicates that, for selected tumor markers, washing can replace PF when PF is absent. A standardized protocol for sampling PF and performing washing during laparoscopy was established.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4167500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41675002014-09-19 Control values of ovarian cancer tumor markers and standardisation of a protocol for sampling peritoneal fluid and performing washing during laparoscopy Jerman, Katarina Galic Kobal, Borut Jakimovska, Marina Verdenik, Ivan Cerne, Katarina World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Determination of the tumor marker concentration in peritoneal fluid (PF) may help to assess its potential to detect small concentration changes between benign ovarian pathology and early stage ovarian cancer. Peritoneal washing, which can also be obtained when PF is absent, is already included in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging classification for ovarian cancer but sampling has not yet been standardized. Since our aim was to evaluate the relationship between marker concentration in PF and washing, standardization of the sampling protocol was a prerequisite to ensure reliable results. METHODS: Thirty-three women with non-malignant pathology of the reproductive organs were included in the study. We used three promising tumor markers for evaluation of the marker concentration in local fluid: osteopontin (sOPN), splice variant 6 of sCD44 (sCD44-v6) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1). After aspiration of PF, washing of the uterus, ovaries and pelvic peritoneum was performed with saline solution. Patients were divided into two groups based on the solution volume: A-20 ml and B-50 ml. To determine the efficiency of washing in relation to solution volume, washing was repeated three times. Concentrations of markers in samples were determined using flow cytometry. RESULTS: Mean concentrations of markers were significantly higher (P <0.001) in PF than in the first washing. We demonstrated a significant positive correlation between marker concentrations in PF and first washing (sOPN: r = 0.447, P = 0.048; sCD44-v6: r = 0.660, P = 0.002; sVCAM-1: r = 0.526, P = 0.017). When using a smaller solution volume for washing, significantly higher (sVCAM-1: 2.5-fold, P = 0.021; sOPN: 3-fold, P = 0.024) or equal (sCD44-v6) mean concentrations of tumor markers were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Our work demonstrates for the first time that concentrations of sOPN, sCD44-v6 and sVCAM-1 in PF correlate with peritoneal washing in women with non-malignant pathology of the reproductive organs. This indicates that, for selected tumor markers, washing can replace PF when PF is absent. A standardized protocol for sampling PF and performing washing during laparoscopy was established. BioMed Central 2014-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4167500/ /pubmed/25185697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-12-278 Text en © Jerman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Jerman, Katarina Galic
Kobal, Borut
Jakimovska, Marina
Verdenik, Ivan
Cerne, Katarina
Control values of ovarian cancer tumor markers and standardisation of a protocol for sampling peritoneal fluid and performing washing during laparoscopy
title Control values of ovarian cancer tumor markers and standardisation of a protocol for sampling peritoneal fluid and performing washing during laparoscopy
title_full Control values of ovarian cancer tumor markers and standardisation of a protocol for sampling peritoneal fluid and performing washing during laparoscopy
title_fullStr Control values of ovarian cancer tumor markers and standardisation of a protocol for sampling peritoneal fluid and performing washing during laparoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Control values of ovarian cancer tumor markers and standardisation of a protocol for sampling peritoneal fluid and performing washing during laparoscopy
title_short Control values of ovarian cancer tumor markers and standardisation of a protocol for sampling peritoneal fluid and performing washing during laparoscopy
title_sort control values of ovarian cancer tumor markers and standardisation of a protocol for sampling peritoneal fluid and performing washing during laparoscopy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4167500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25185697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-12-278
work_keys_str_mv AT jermankatarinagalic controlvaluesofovariancancertumormarkersandstandardisationofaprotocolforsamplingperitonealfluidandperformingwashingduringlaparoscopy
AT kobalborut controlvaluesofovariancancertumormarkersandstandardisationofaprotocolforsamplingperitonealfluidandperformingwashingduringlaparoscopy
AT jakimovskamarina controlvaluesofovariancancertumormarkersandstandardisationofaprotocolforsamplingperitonealfluidandperformingwashingduringlaparoscopy
AT verdenikivan controlvaluesofovariancancertumormarkersandstandardisationofaprotocolforsamplingperitonealfluidandperformingwashingduringlaparoscopy
AT cernekatarina controlvaluesofovariancancertumormarkersandstandardisationofaprotocolforsamplingperitonealfluidandperformingwashingduringlaparoscopy